• 2 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 5 minutes Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 8 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 15 mins Emissions Need To Be Halved To Avoid 3C Warming
  • 5 hours The Pope: "Climate change ... doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain."
  • 14 hours Hormuz and surrounding waters: Energy Threats to the World: Oil, LNG, shipping markets digest new risks after Strait of Hormuz attack
  • 15 hours OPEC, GEO-POLITICS & OIL SUPPLY & PRICES
  • 6 hours Coal Boom in Asia is Real and a Long Trend
  • 1 hour Pioneer CEO Said U.S. Oil Production would be up to 15 mm bbls/day NOW if we had the pipelines. Permian pipelines STARTING Q3
  • 9 hours The Magic and Wonders of US Shale Supply: Keeping energy price shock minimised: US oil supply keeping lid on prices despite global risks: IEA chief
  • 3 hours Solar Panels at 26 cents per watt
  • 9 hours Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 9 hours US to become net oil exporter in November: EIA
  • 6 hours US Shale Drilling lacks regulatory body.
  • 13 hours Trudeau approves Trans Mountain Pipeline
  • 16 hours The Latest: Iranian FM Says US Cannot Expect To ‘Stay Safe’
  • 15 hours The Plastics Problem
Alt Text

Why The Oklahoma Shale Boom Isn’t Taking Off

Major geological challenges and relatively…

Alt Text

Global Oil Market Surprisingly Oversupplied

Despite OPEC oil production cuts…

Alt Text

Are Oil Prices About To Bounce Back?

Money managers have gotten increasingly…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Carbon Capture and Storage Could Cause Earthquakes

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) involves injecting carbon dioxide into underground geological reservoirs for long term storage, and is a major part of the global strategy for reducing greenhouse gas levels. It is already used in several oil and gas fields as a technique to prevent gases from entering the atmosphere, however in order to significantly reduce emission levels CCS would need to be scaled up massively to store more than 3.5 billion metric tons of CO2 a year.

Unfortunately a new paper written by two geophysicists from Stanford University, Professors Mark Zoback and Steven Gorelick, and published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that CCS may actually cause earthquakes.

CCS is intended as a method to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere for thousands of year, so any chance of triggering earthquakes, which could allow the gas to escape to the surface, needs to be thoroughly researched. The plan to use CCS as the backbone of our greenhouse gas reduction strategy will have to be reconsidered.

Zoback said that “almost all of our current climate mitigation models assume CCS is going to be one of the primary tools we use. What we’re saying is, not so fast.”

The earthquakes created by human activity tend not to be as large as naturally occurring earthquakes at the boundaries between tectonic plates. They occur far from the boundaries as pressure within the earth’s crust is increased to such a level that local faults can slip. Last year, storing wastewater from fracking under high pressure induced small quakes in Arkansas, Ohio, Colorado, and New Mexico.

The quakes themselves are generally not destructive, but they could break the seals on the reservoirs storing the CO2, releasing the gas into the atmosphere. Zoback and Gorelick state that even a fault slip of a few centimeters could allow stored CO2 to reach the surface; a problem considering the whole point of CCS is to bar the gases access to the surface.

Another hurdle facing CCS is that the formations where it can be utilised have a very specific geological profile. The reservoirs themselves are formed from weak, porous rock that slows down pressure build ups, and are isolated from the surface by an impermeable rock layer, such as shale.

Zoback and Gorelick believe that in order to significantly reduce CO2 emissions by CCS, roughly 3,500 such formations will need to be discovered, and the worry is that there are not enough; although scientists disagree about that number. Sally Benson, professor of energy resources engineering and director of Stanford’s Global Climate and Energy Project, argues that only 600 such sites need to be found and that many already exist in Texas, the Gulf Coast, the Middle East, the North Sea, and Western Australia. She also suggests that the pressure build-up can be easily managed by controlling the injection rate, and carefully designing the well.

Zoback is still doubtful as to the viability of using CCS as a large scale carbon emission reduction method. “For the U.S. and the world to be considering CCS one of the potential solutions to the greenhouse gas problem—it’s a very high risk endeavor,” he said. “We need options that are practical, don’t cost literally trillions of dollars and aren’t vulnerable to moderate size earthquakes.”

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • William on June 29 2012 said:
    Nice. Lets store it under the earths crust so one day it all can get releasted or it can make its way to other places where it shouldn't.
    What happens if we're around then still.
    Why can't we freeze into dried ice and sent it into space in cheaply made rockets from n Korea .

Leave a comment





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News