• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 5 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 2 days US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 16 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 20 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 1 day The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 12 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 16 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 3 hours Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 2 days Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 2 days OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 2 days A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 1 day 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 11 hours The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
Alt Text

Are Energy Majors Under Threat From Big Tech?

Audi and Amazon have teamed…

Alt Text

Hurricane Michael’s Impact On Gasoline Demand

Hurricane Michael had a significant…

Alt Text

Oil’s $133 Billion Black Market

With oil prices back on…

Wayne Madsen

Wayne Madsen

Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist, author and syndicated columnist. He has written for The Village Voice, The Progressive, Counterpunch, Online Journal, CorpWatch,…

More Info

Trending Discussions

BP Gets Pass From Obama Administration To Potentially Pollute Lake Michigan

The Obama administration, already charged with providing political cover for BP in the Gulf of Mexico mega-oil disaster, is also charged with allowing BP to renege on agreements between the firm, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the state of Indiana to prevent pollution of Lake Michigan from the firm's Whiting, Indiana refinery near Hammond.

In 2007, the EPA, under the Bush administration, said it was powerless to stop BP from dumping more toxic waste into Lake Michigan from its expanded refinery that was processing increased amounts of heavy crude oil from Canada.
However, the EPA did urge BP to mitigate the increased pollution of solid waste and ammonia by taking other proactive steps to limit environmental damage, including financing projects for other plants along the Grand Calumet River and Lake Michigan to reduce their pollution and other clean-up and run-off water-filtering projects.

Environmental groups opposed the EPA permit to expand its Lake Michigan refining operations. BP's position was bolstered by federal and state court decisions that shot down the suits from the environmental groups. BP also took out newspaper advertisements and paid Internet bloggers to defend the refinery's expansion. The payment of money to bloggers by BP is also evident in the number of pro-BP postings on the web concerning the crude oil disaster, including comments on many blogs that call WMR's reports on the Gulf disaster a "conspiracy theory" and "factually incorrect."

The Obama administration, including EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, has permitted BP to violate the promises it made to the state and federal courts that steps would be taken to mitigate the effects of increased Lake Michigan pollution.

Informed sources in Chicago have told WMR that what is occurring in the Gulf of Mexico could very well happen to Lake Michigan when considering that BP not only continues to pollute the lake at higher rates but also has a record of safety and environmental infractions at the expanded Indiana refinery.

By Wayne Madsen for OilPrice.com

Visit our homepage for the latest oil prices and energy news.


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on May 22 2010 said:
    there are reports that the queen of england is a major share holder in bp, and also bp is involved with the trilateral commission and the bilderbergers, and so has the power and influence to pretty much do what it wants .

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News