• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 8 hours Maybe 8 to 10 "good" years left in oil industry * UAE model for Economic Deversification * Others spent oil billions on funding terrorism, wars, suppressing dissidents, building nukes * Too late now
  • 4 hours OPEC will consider all options. What options do they have ?
  • 31 mins Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 14 hours Russia Accuses U.S. Of Stoking Tensions With Missile Test
  • 5 hours What to tell my students
  • 5 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 18 hours With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
  • 6 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 9 hours TRUMP'S FORMER 'CHRISTIAN LIAISON' SAYS DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER WAS GOD'S PUNISHMENT FOR OBAMA ISRAEL DIVISION
  • 1 hour Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 1 day In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 21 hours Get First Access To The Oilprice App!
  • 10 hours Flaring is at Record Highs in Texas
Alt Text

The Toughest Challenge For Any Energy Company In 2019

Strong volatility and poor overall…

Alt Text

Aramco IPO Could Spell Disaster For Big Oil

The Saudi Aramco IPO could…

Alt Text

Oil Markets Dominated By Bearish Sentiment

With the latest trade war…

Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb is a freelance writer and communications consultant who writes frequently about energy and environment. His work has also appeared in The Christian Science…

More Info

Premium Content

Are Fossil Fuels Necessary for our Future Civilization?

Most people imagine the future to be a place of plenty where energy is abundant and cheap, where every door is an automatic door and, most important, all of the problems of the present have been solved by technology: no pollution, no disease (or at least a lot less of it), no climate change, no high prices, no violence (at least no street violence) and no poverty (except, of course, on planets that haven't yet reached our level of development). It's a recipe for inaction and passivity in the face of the many daunting challenges humankind now faces. And, it has a political dimension that suits the current power structure: "Just sit back and we'll take care of the future. You don't need to challenge our ideas or authority because everything will work out for the best." It is a message right out of the mouth of Dr. Pangloss in Candide that we live in "the best of all possible worlds."

This is, of course, not the only fantasy about the future. There are grim forecasts of darkened landscapes of destruction caused by war or by mere neglect following some civilization-destroying catastrophe--a plague, a severe solar storm which knocks out the electrical grid, a famine caused by biotechnology gone awry, or a world hopelessly scorched by runaway global warming. And, this is yet another recipe for paralysis. What can one really do in the face of such catastrophes? As friend of mine once said, "You can't prepare for the end of civilization."

But, you can prepare for something short of that. An outcome between "the best of all possible worlds" techno-optimism and a Mad Max-style collapse of civilization actually calls for more imagination, and, above all, it calls for action. And, that is when the future stops being a narrow-minded tyrant and becomes a field of imagination and possibilities. This is no license for soft-headed optimism, but rather a goad to pragmatic thinking about the needs of people and societies and the biosphere that supports them.

What do humans actually need to lead full and joyful lives? That is the question we should start with. Admittedly, it is not an easy question to answer. To a certain extent it will be geographically and culturally determined. But right now fossil fuels are doing all the talking, telling us that unlimited resource consumption is our glorious birthright and the key to human achievement and happiness.

But, people achieved happiness, fulfillment, and even long life before fossil fuels, and they may very well do so after fossil fuels have stopped being burned. H.D.F. Kitto in his famous popular guide to the life of the ancient Greeks points out that for those living in Greece at the time--if they survived fatal childhood diseases--the Mediterranean climate afforded a lifespan of 60, 70 and even 80 years for many. Not bad for a nation without modern medicine. Longevity then is not merely the property of modern peoples. And, it is, in the end, not the sole criterion for a good life; 100 years in prison seems worse, not better, than 60 years in prison.

We are constantly told that the way in which we live today is better than the way people lived before the modern industrial age. Perhaps that should at least be prefaced with the qualification that some privileged people who lead middle- and upper-class lives in wealthy industrial countries should count themselves better off than their ancestors. But it is worth noting that even the culturally advanced ancient Greeks imagined that their golden age had long since passed and that their civilization was well decayed. Ironically, today, we consider that supposed period of decay to be the time of their greatest achievements.

What lies ahead for humanity may end up seeming better or worse than what we have today. But it will certainly be different. Wouldn't it be a good idea for each of us to consider our role in this future rather than have that role defined for us by fantasies that lead to paralysis or lure us into a naive passivity?

By. Kurt Cobb

Source: Resource Insights




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on March 09 2011 said:
    I am helping start a new credit union. At a meeting where prospective members were viewing our sweet, innocent proposal with cynical suspicioun, I said, "We are 'they.'" People of say, 'Why did "they" do that?' Or, 'why didn't "they" do that?' Now is your chance to be the "they" other people complain about in the future."This, of course, assumes there will be a future. And that the cockroaches and starlings will be reading our old blogs. They may have better things to do...
  • Anonymous on March 10 2011 said:
    What a question. If you are talking about the future up to the middle of this century, the answer is probably. Take off ten or so years and the answer is certainly. Take off another ten years and any questions being asked have to do with what you are drinking, smoking or sniffing.
  • Anonymous on March 10 2011 said:
    We dont need fossil fuels. Nature provides us with unlimited energy. It just takes intelligence and will to harness it.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play