• 2 days Court rules DOE to implement Obama efficiency rules
  • 5 hours DOA to invest $6.5M in coal industry
  • 6 hours US to hold largest oil and gas lease sale in its history
  • 1 day Tillerson Seeks A Deal With Erdogan On Syria
  • 1 day White House considering steel and aluminum tariffs
  • 2 days Iraq Seeks $100 Bln to Rebuild Economy
  • 2 days Allegedly the Search For Aliens is Struggling Thanks to Cryptocurrency Mania
  • 4 hours New Rules to Phase Out Coal and Reduce Natural Gas in Canada
  • 2 days Amazon reaches $1.2 million settlement with EPA over illegal pesticide sales
  • 5 hours White House Not Even Close to Regulating Bitcoin Yet
  • 1 day U.S. Bancorp hit with $613M in penalties
  • 5 hours Experts said US losing ground to China on AI
  • 2 days Australia's solar power boom to double in a year
  • 2 days US intelligence warn against Chinese phones
  • 2 days Electric Buses to Reach Half of World Fleet by 2025
  • 2 days How Good Is Putin's Word?
Alt Text

Most Big Banks Are Now Bullish On Oil

Big banks have finally accepted…

Alt Text

The Shale Driller's Dilemma

Shale drillers face a major…

Alt Text

Russia Gets $41.5 Billion Boost From OPEC Deal

Since the beginning of OPEC’s…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

An Unsolvable Natural Gas Dilemma

Rig

Natural gas isn’t the first thing that comes to mind at the mention of the Netherlands. Clean energy is a more likely association. And yet gas is at the center of one of the country’s major headaches. At the heart of the problem is the giant Groningen gas field that, when it was discovered in 1959, was the largest gas field in the world.

Since then, Groningen has produced hundreds of billions of cubic meters of gas and has, in the meantime, significantly increased seismic activity in the area. This increase in seismic activity has damaged thousands of homes and eventually led to a gradual production cut that is still underway. Unfortunately, the production won’t solve the earthquake problem and the gas from Groningen is difficult—and expensive—to replace.

After the latest earthquake in the area of Groningen, which occurred earlier this month, the operator of the field, NAM, said further cuts were necessary, but added that these won’t put an end to the quakes. The reason: any fluctuation in production is conducive to heightened seismic activity.

The government seems determined to phase out Groningen as fast as possible, but it faces a couple of major challenges in doing that. First, the Groningen field produces low-calorie natural gas and almost all Dutch households use it, which means the distribution network has specifically been developed for this type of gas. All heating appliances and systems in the country were designed with this quality of gas in mind.

Second, converting imported, higher-calorie gas into the kind that household appliances work with in the Netherlands is an expensive process, and the existing conversion facilities are running at capacity. Building more will take years and hundreds of millions of euros.

Now, the government has warned 200 large companies in the country to start thinking about how they will switch to alternative energy sources within the next five years, so by 2022 there should be no Groningen gas going to industrial users.

Related: The Blockchain Revolution Is Heading To Space

Last year, the Netherlands generated a tenth of its electricity from wind and solar installations. This should rise to 14 percent by 2020. But that’s a small consolation when it comes to Groningen. Whatever the source of electricity, using it instead of gas will require the electrification of a lot of heating systems.

The ultimate solution would involve both reducing demand for gas and switching to alternatives. Yet lowering demand would be difficult, too, especially over the short period that the Dutch government has in mind. No wonder then that last November, a court said that the government had failed to make it clear how it would lower demand for gas to facilitate the phase-out of Groningen.

Yet, even when gas production at the field stops, this will not stop the quakes, it seems, so any solution would be far from perfect. Sure, the businesses will get renewable energy incentives and they will be forced to make the shift, but the quakes are likely to continue. The state prosecutors are investigating NAM—a Shell/Exxon JV—for failing to conduct risk assessments after 1993 when the link between gas extraction and the tremors was discovered. But fixing the blame won’t get the Netherlands any closer to fixing the problem.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • David Middleton on January 25 2018 said:
    Groningen field
  • David Middleton on January 25 2018 said:
    Groningen gas field is onshore.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News