• 4 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 7 minutes Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 13 minutes NordStream2
  • 14 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 12 hours California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 14 hours "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 3 days "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
  • 1 day U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 1 day Nord Stream - US/German consultations
  • 3 days An Indian Opinion on What is Going on in China
  • 4 days Can Technology Keep Coal Plants Alive and Well?
  • 5 days Succession Planning in Human Resources for Vaccinated Individuals in the Oil & Gas Industry
  • 17 hours Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 1 day Australia sues Neoen for lack of power from its Tesla battery
  • 4 days Storage of gas cylinders
  • 5 days Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.
Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Premium Content

Ad Companies Are Boycotting Big Oil

In 1939, studies began to suggest that smoking might not be that great for you, sullying a great American pastime and a key United States economic industry. What was once a stalwart sector and an established cultural norm soon crumbled. Throughout the ‘40s, scientists continued to link cigarettes to alarmingly higher instances of cancer and heart disease and by the late 1950s, every single U.S. state had instated laws banning the sale of cigarettes to children. An infamous 1969 surgeon general report linked smoking with low birth weight and Congress appeased mounting pressure from the public health sector by putting warning labels on cigarette packaging. In 1969, tobacco companies were the single largest product advertisers on television, and then, seemingly overnight, they lost the battle. The last cigarette ad ever to air on television ran at 11:50 p.m. during a break from The Johnny Carson Show on January 1, 1971.

Now, some observers are pointing to the parallels between Big Tobacco and Big Oil. They had the money, they had the lobbyists, and they had a faithfully addicted populace. But eventually, public opinion shifted and Big Tobacco suffered. So it’s not unreasonable to think that a similar fate is could be visited upon the oil supermajors. It certainly appears that ad agencies are using the same tactics.

Ad Agencies Step Away From Oil and Gas in Echo of Cigarette Exodus,” a New York Times headline proclaimed last week. Already, there is a groundswell of activism from organizations such as Greenpeace USA trying to rally the advertising industry around the climate-conscious cause of boycotting Big Oil’s increasingly frequent “greenwashing” ad campaigns. One recent feel-good campaign from Chevron, which associated the supermajor oil company with clean energy was posted on YouTube just a few weeks before one of Chevron’s California refineries sprung a leak into the waters of the San Francisco Bay.  Related: VW’s Secret Plan To Change To EV-Friendly Name

On March 16, Greenpeace and other environmental groups filed an official complaint about these kinds of oil industry ads with the Federal Trade Commission, which explicitly accused Chevron of “consistently misrepresenting its image to appear climate-friendly and racial justice-oriented, while its business operations overwhelmingly rely on climate-polluting fossil fuels, which disproportionately harm communities of color.” 

Greenpeace and environmental activists are not alone. They’re part of a larger movement to shut Big Oil out of advertising, the New York Times reports. Along with a number of smaller ad agencies, major international ad firm Forsman & Bodenfors signed a pledge this month promising to halt all work with oil and gas producers, utility companies, and those industries’ lobbyists. For now, the movement is a grassroots one and there has been no policy backup, but that’s exactly how the pressure started to mount for Big Tobacco.

The comparison between Big Oil and Big Tobacco is hardly a novel one. Back in January of 2020, the Guardian published an op-ed headlined “Big oil is the new big tobacco. Congress must use its power to investigate.” In September of 2020 Vice picked up the story with its own addition, “Surprise, Big Oil Has the Same Lawyers as Big Tobacco.” And earlier just this month E&E News wrote, “Big Tobacco had to pay $206B. Is Big Oil next?” The throughline is this: Big Tobacco lied to the public and the courts for decades about the harm that they knew they were doing to their consumers’ health. Now those same voices are claiming that Big Oil lied to the public and the courts for decades about the harm they knew they were doing to the climate. 

The reality, however, is that oil continues to play a vital role in our society and many of the world’s largest energy companies are also working on long-term solutions to the emissions problem. Many oil companies, especially in Europe, are already making the transition from Big Oil to Big Energy and, at some point, many of those feel-good ads that detractors claim are disingenuous now will cross that invisible threshold and go from greenwashing to simply green.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News