• 25 mins Bidding Action Heats Up In UK’s Continental Shelf
  • 5 hours Keystone Pipeline Restart Still Unknown
  • 9 hours UK Offers North Sea Oil Producers Tax Relief To Boost Investment
  • 11 hours Iraq Wants To Build Gas Pipeline To Kuwait In Blow To Shell
  • 13 hours Trader Trafigura Raises Share Of Oil Purchases From State Firms
  • 15 hours German Energy Group Uniper Rejects $9B Finnish Takeover Bid
  • 16 hours Total Could Lose Big If It Pulls Out Of South Pars Deal
  • 18 hours Dakota Watchdog Warns It Could Revoke Keystone XL Approval
  • 1 day Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 2 days Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 2 days Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 2 days Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 2 days Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 2 days Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 2 days Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 2 days U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 2 days Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 2 days Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 2 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 3 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 3 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 3 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 5 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 5 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 5 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 6 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 6 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 6 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 6 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 6 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 6 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 6 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 7 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 7 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 7 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 7 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 7 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 7 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 7 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
Alt Text

Can Oil Majors Continue To Beat Estimates?

As oil prices claw their…

Alt Text

Is China Heading Toward An Energy-Debt Crisis?

China’s influence is often overlooked…

Alt Text

Are Electric Cars As Clean As They Seem?

Electric cars are set to…

Kent Moors

Kent Moors

Dr. Kent Moors is an internationally recognized expert in oil and natural gas policy, risk management, emerging market economic development, and market risk assessment. His…

More Info

A New Oil Crisis Is Developing In The Middle East

oil

After over 40 years in the energy business, more than two decades of that with a parallel career in intelligence, I regularly witness the impact of global developments on the energy markets.

So it’s hardly surprising that I often address geopolitical events here.

Currently, situations in Latin America (Venezuela), Asia (the South China Sea crisis), and Africa (ongoing civil conflict in Libya and Nigeria) show how widespread the geopolitical impact is on energy prices and availability.

Each one either is, or could easily, spike oil price volatility.

But the instability in a different region remains the biggest single factor in how the two sectors interact…

The Middle East.

There, two significant events unfolded over the past week. Each is certain to have an impact on how crude oil trades in the near-term.

The curious de-certification of JCPOA (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, more popularly known as the “Iranian nuclear accord”), by President Trump, was followed in short order by the ominous hostilities between Iraq and Kurdistan over the status of the city and region of Kirkuk.

Both impact the northern Persian Gulf, already a region with a short fuse.

The toppling of Raqqa, the self-styled ISIS capital, may be underway in Syria, but the ongoing cross-border disagreements have already spread elsewhere.

And they could set the whole region on fire…

Sanctions Don’t Work Very Well

First, take the Iranian nuclear deal. Decertifying it was a curious choice by the White House, as it actually accomplishes very little.

The move kicks the can back to Congress, where the legislative branch has 60 days to decide whether the U.S. remains in the accord.

What it does do, of course, is increase volatility.

Any attempt to resume economic actions against Tehran will have an effect on oil prices.

Put simply, there is no indication OPEC will be relaxing its cap on production, while renewed U.S. sanctions will almost certainly reduce Iranian exports.

When the conversation moves to economic sanctions, I have noted previously here in Oil & Energy Investor that I have some personal knowledge of the matter. In an earlier period of my life, my portfolio included the design and running of such U.S. reprisals in several parts of the world.

One thing I learned was the limited impact of such moves.

Public opinion still holds that economic sanctions can bring a nation to its knees. Unfortunately, that is not the case.

Such weapons tend to hurt the poorest residents of a target country, while resolute central governments there remain unrelenting.

Massive economic sanctions did not prevent Japan from attacking the U.S. and pulling it into World War II, nor did they dissuade Saddam Hussein, or for that matter prompt Tehran to stop its nuclear program prior to the negotiation of JCPOA.

They will not have a better result this time.

That’s because every one of the other signatories to the accord (Russia, China, the UK, France, and Germany) have certified that Iran is abiding by the agreement.

Any move to resume U.S. sanctions will have limited impact. This time around, all the other nations involved will not agree to comply with them, giving Iran a way around American sanctions.

Now, Congress passed an ancillary piece of legislation, not part of the JCPOA itself, asking the president to periodically certify whether Iran is abiding by the deal. And last time it came up – earlier this year – even President Trump certified that Iran was in compliance.

In any event, nothing has happened in the past six months to change that assessment. Now, the White House and some in Congress would like the accord to include restrictions on Iranian support of outside groups and a prevention of further ballistic missile development.

These are objectives worthy of consideration. Related: The World's Top Crude Trader Sees Brent Crashing To $45

But no nation can retroactively (and unilaterally) decide to add elements to an already approved international agreement.

These matters, while important, have nothing to do with certifying JCPOA. They are simply not a part of that deal.

Last week, I provided a comment from a Russian colleague that deserves repeating: “One does not improve the trade in oranges by adding apples.”

(Click to enlarge)

Dr. Moors providing a keynote address to the Iranian Summit held in Frankfurt earlier this year

On each occasion when I meet with officials and leaders of the Iranian energy sector I have two reactions

First, there is a window of opportunity allowing some possible joint endeavors of benefit to both sides.

But second, Iranians will not be pushed into a corner and cry “uncle.”

It reminds me of one of the pieces of advice I would regularly give my graduate students in my tenure as a university professor: “Learn to work successfully with people you happen not to like personally.”

As Congress deliberates over the next 60 days on whether to maintain American involvement in the JCPOA, uncertainty over Iranian export flows should result in the oil pricing floor slowly rising, as the market is already approaching a balance between supply and demand.

The other issue – the blowback against the Kurdish move to independence – is far more recent and more serious…

The Kurdistan Crisis is Already Limiting Oil Supply

A few days ago, Iraqi military forces supported by Shiite militia took over the northern city of Kirkuk. This puts Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in Irbil in a direct armed conflict.

Kurdistan remains nominally a part of Iraq. It has had a semi-autonomous status for several years, but the overwhelming “Yes” vote in last month’s independence referendum there has ushered in a new crisis.

Today, Kirkuk is not part of Kurdistan, but it is the traditional capital of the Kurdish people.

Kurds remain the largest ethnic group in the world without their own country. The preponderance of that population lives in northeastern Iraq, northwestern Iran, and eastern Turkey.

In other words, in what is probably the most sensitive area in the region.

The Kurds have been contending with Baghdad, Tehran, and Ankara ever since Saddam was toppled from office. Matters have now reached a dangerous level.

At issue right now are the primary oil-producing areas surrounding Kirkuk, as well as the Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline to southeastern Turkey – the primary northern Iraqi crude oil export avenue.

The area surrounding Kirkuk provides a shade more than 40% of all Iraqi oil production. Some of that has been effectively “acquired” by Kurdistan, while other oil and natural gas fields exist that are squarely within territory administered by the KRG.

Thus far, in the less than 72 hours following the Iraqi military move, about 450,000 barrels a day of production have been lost to the market, all from KRG-controlled fields.

Meanwhile, as contacts in the KRG Ministry of Natural Resources, Iraqi Ministry of Petroleum, Iranian Ministry of Petroleum, and Russian Ministry of Energy (Minenergo) confirm, Kurdistan has become the target for accelerating foreign interest. Related: Are Combustion Engines Reaching Peak Demand?

I advised the KRG Ministry in designing the Kurdish Oil Law and Model Production Agreement, as well as the Iraqi Ministry of Petroleum in the revisions of Iraqi regulations on field development. The KRG has provided a better approach for foreign companies. That has resulted in some international majors (led by Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and Total SA (TOT)) to forego contracts in Iraq proper and move to Kurdistan.

All of this has put an outside emphasis on securing agreements with the KRG. The new conflict merely accentuates the pressure.

I had advised private clients since July of this year that the winding down of military operations against ISIS – a cause in which Baghdad, Irbil, and Tehran were “allies” – would result in a heightened rift between the Kurds and the Iraqi central government.

The vote for Kurdish independence was the first wave. Military confrontation has been the second.

I next meet with Kurdish officials in early December, although meetings with both Kurds and Iranians are now shaping up for next month. It’s a comment on the uncertain times that the former will be held in London while the latter takes place in Paris.

By Dr. Kent Moors

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Naomi on October 23 2017 said:
    Average monthly income in Russia as of January 2016 was 21365 rubles (USD 291). 2015 yearly average wage was 32122 rubles (USD 437). Sanctions on Russia are only beginning and they work extremely well.
  • Bill101 on October 24 2017 said:
    Wages in Russia averaged 12836.67 RUB/Month from 1992 until 2017, reaching an all time high of 47554 RUB/Month in December of 2016.
  • Boris on October 24 2017 said:
    Russians spend their average wage in rubles and not in USD. The sanctions helped domestic producers replace imported goods which means more jobs. The inflation consistently being reported at 4% and Russia has been running almost debt-free economics. So, more sanctions please!
  • Douglas Houck on October 25 2017 said:
    Events have somewhat outstripped this article.

    Yes, no much is going to come of the US's schizophrenic relationship with Iran and the JCPOA. US actions does nothing more than help China advance its move of petro-yuans.

    The Kurdish referendum is over and the Kurds lost. They have lost most of their oil and now the border controls through which the oil transited to Turkey. Other than Israel, who got 3/4 of their oil from the Kurds at a heavy discount, nobody is backing the Kurd's desire for independence. Kurdistan never made any sense as it would be a landlocked country with little resources now that the Kirkuk oil fields are gone. Masoud Barzani will be lucky to stay out of jail. Hopefully, the oil will begin flowing shortly.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News