• 3 hours Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 5 hours Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 7 hours OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 10 hours Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 11 hours Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 12 hours Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 1 day API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 1 day Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 1 day EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 1 day IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 1 day Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 1 day Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 1 day Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 1 day Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 2 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 2 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 2 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 2 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 2 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 2 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 2 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 3 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 3 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 3 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 3 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 3 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 3 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 3 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 4 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 6 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 6 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 6 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 6 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 6 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 6 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 6 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 7 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
  • 7 days Residents Flee After Nigeria Gas Company Pipeline Explodes
  • 7 days Venezuela To Pre-Mine Petro For Release In 6-Weeks
  • 7 days Trump Says U.S. “Could Conceivably” Rejoin Paris Climate Accord
Alt Text

Congo’s Cobalt Tax Hike Threatens EV Market

The nation responsible for about…

Alt Text

The Most Feared Businessman In Russia

No politician or businessman is…

Peter Tertzakian

Peter Tertzakian

Peter is an economist, investment strategist, author and public speaker on issues vital to the future of energy. He has clocked over 30 years of…

More Info

$60 Oil Will Not Last Long


U.S. oil prices are treading water above $US 60/B (WTI) again, the first time since 2015.

Crude oil has a northerly wind in its sails, though everybody on board this fickle ship is cautious about its compass bearing. Since 2013 we’ve seen the price of a barrel peak to $110, capsize to $26, and roll back to $60.

The gyrations make sense.

Here is what we’ve learned over the past decade:

Above $80 is too high. Cash flow is ample. Investors gladly fund more drilling rigs. Pump jacks work hard. Too much productive capacity is added. But costs inflate quickly too—competitiveness diminishes within the oil industry, and also encourages alternative energy systems. Consumers become more miserly and demand growth decelerates.

Under $40 is too low. Cash flows dry up and investors jump ship. Rigs head back to their yards with drooping masts. Costs deflate, rapidly decimating employees and equipment in the service industry. Production begins to decline in marginal regions. State-owned enterprises are unable to pay their ‘social dividends’. On the consumption side, conservation and efficiency lose meaning; consumers revert to guzzling oil like free refills of coffee.

So, simplistically a mid-range price of $US 60/B should represent what oil pundits call “market balance.” It’s the elusive price point where daily consumption is equal to production; inventory levels are neither too low nor too high; and economists’ cost curves intersect with demand. Related: 5 Energy Sector Predictions For 2018

Yet, if there is one thing 160 years of the oil age teaches us, there is no such thing as a mid-range balancing point in oil markets. Everyone either rushes to one side of the ship or the other, almost always at the wrong time.

As in any marketplace, oil producers and consumers respond to price signals. Those on the using end of petroleum products respond to the changing winds of price fairly quickly. On the other hand, much of the world’s big producers are not like nimble sailboats, rather they act like big supertankers that take time to change direction. In other words, the time between investing capital (or not) to realizing changes in production is slower.

Even in the last 10 years, the frequency of price data (WTI) shows clustering around either the $45 to $50/B grouping or the $95 to $100/B range (see Figure 1). Of course, costs have come down significantly, and the shale revolution has not only lowered the cost curve, but also shortened the cycle time of responding to price signals. So, in theory it’s easy to believe that the low end of the price spectrum may be the new norm.

(Click to enlarge)

But that’s theory. In the oilfields of the world, much of the changes in cost have been a result of taking margin out of the service industry, something that goes up and down with the same waves that bob price. Further, productivity gains seen in US and Canadian shale plays are not the norm in the world—most oil producing nations are rocking the boat by shutting off oil valves rather than innovating on their processes. Related: The World’s Most Expensive Oil

Today’s choppy world of lower extraction costs, process innovation, investor apathy, disruptive alternatives and environmental pressures, have made us skeptical in believing in the possibility of higher prices. And when prices are high our minds become landlocked into thinking about endless demand growth, geopolitics, cartel collusion, steep decline rates and the necessity of high levels of capital investment.

I’m only skeptical of one thing: That world oil markets will balance around $US 60/B. Historically, oil prices have not anchored in the calm of mid-ranges for long. So, today’s price is only a way point to either $US 45/B or much higher.

By Peter Tertzakian

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Clyde Boyd on January 12 2018 said:
    The current price runup is almost entirely market speculation ie market manipulation by oil traders. A perfect example of why most Americans have no use for oil traders . Supply and demand does not justify this current round of price gouging and eventually it will fail, in fact hopefully supply will surge from frackers and oil traders will go bankrupt. Neverthess the supply will inevitably increase again. Its only a matter of time.
  • Mamdouh G Salameh on January 12 2018 said:
    The recent surge in oil prices since early December 2017 has put a price floor of $60 a barrel under the oil price. 2018 will see a price floor of $70/barrel.

    While many analysts attribute the oil price surge to geopolitical developments, the truth is that oil market fundamentals are positive enough to support an oil price ranging from $70-$80/barrel on their own. That is why the oil price is heading towards $70 and beyond in 2018 and $100 or higher by 2020.

    A fair price is $100-$130/barrel. Such a price enables oil producers to invest in oil exploration and capacity expansion so as to be able to meet rising global oil demand in coming years, enhances global investments and gives incentives to the global oil industry to invest in new projects. In so doing, they stimulate growth in the global economy.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Donald Clifford on January 12 2018 said:
    Dr. Salameh posits a high equilibrium price. I think this number is possible, in the environment of a very weak dollar, and in a price bubble. Production costs have declined with technological advances. Predicting the future is tricky. Dr. Salemeh is well schooled. But I still tend toward a much more conservative price future.
  • Riswin Ashraf on January 14 2018 said:
    With Europe moving towards 100% electric vehicles in 2030 and rest of the countries following suit, I do not see Oil being the subtext of all things global, in the coming decade.
  • Vittorio Pareto on January 14 2018 said:
    Well said peter. Could not agree more.
  • Travis on January 15 2018 said:
    My crazy prediction

    1. In the future people will look at our generation and call us crazy for burning fossil fuels for transportation as hydrocarbons real and truly unsurpassed value is in manufacturing advanced materials

    2. There is likely secret battery tech out there that hasn't been released to the masses that will make the internal combustion engine obsolete. But the powers that be are just sitting on it
  • EB on January 16 2018 said:

    Your crazy predictions have nothing to do with the topic at hand and they base themselves on simply wrong assumptions. Are your crazy predictions perhaps some camouflaged form of wishful thinking?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News