• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 1 day Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

The “Amazon Effect” Is Coming To Oil Markets

The move toward using software…

Alt Text

How OPEC Continues To Cheat On Its Own Deal

OPEC oil production has once…

Alt Text

Who Are The Biggest Buyers Of U.S. Oil?

Exports of U.S. petroleum and…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

World’s Most Expensive Oil Project Just Got More Costly

World’s Most Expensive Oil Project Just Got More Costly

Just as oil prices hit multiyear lows, several oil majors announced some more terrible news.

The Kashagan oil field – the world’s most expensive oil project – will face several more years of delays and cost overruns. The project’s price tag, already north of $50 billion (other estimates say costs are much higher), will rise by an additional $4 billion as a consortium of international oil companies have to replace two 55-mile pipelines. The episode highlights the growing difficulty that oil majors are having at maintaining their worldwide production levels.

Kashagan was supposed to be a symbol of Kazakhstan’s arrival. Situated offshore in the Caspian Sea, the oil field holds an estimated 13 billion barrels of oil, enough oil to meet total global demand for five months. In fact, when it was discovered in 2000, it was arguably the largest oil discovery in three decades. But accessing the oil is another matter. The project also claims the title of the world’s most technically challenging oil project, due to several unique challenges.

Related: Central Asia Rues Dependency On Russian Fuel

First, the Caspian ices over for part of the year, which makes drilling difficult. Second, the oil is located several kilometers below the seabed where it comingles with large volumes of toxic hydrogen sulfide.

The North Caspian Operating Company (NCOC), the international consortium heading up the project, has struggled mightily with Kashagan. It was originally supposed to be operational in 2005 and only cost $10 billion, but technical challenges delayed the project for the better part of a decade. Kashagan briefly came online in the fall of 2013, but was quickly shut down because of corrosion in its pipelines, and it has been idled since then.

The problem is the harsh and corrosive nature of hydrogen sulfide gas, or H2S. Two 55-mile pipelines have to be totally replaced because sulfide gas has corroded them. After NCOC decided the pipelines would need to be replaced in their entirety, they announced that the project would be delayed until at least 2016.

But the Financial Times reported on October 9 2014 that the consortium – led by Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil, Total, Eni, and CNPC – has decided to use a more corrosive-resistant metal for the pipelines. That should help it avoid future problems with H2S, but it also carries a heavy price tag. The replacement could cost at least $3.6 billion, perhaps more. “You can safely bet it’s going to be more than [$3.6bn],” a source told the FT. And now, production may not begin until 2017 at the earliest.

Kashagan continues to be a severe headache for all the companies involved. But it couldn’t come at a worse time, with oil prices falling below $90 per barrel. And that underscores the dangerous territory that oil majors are operating in.

Once Kashagan comes online, it will provide a benchmark for where the oil industry is going. As Josh Young writes for Seeking Alpha, Kashagan represents a dramatic rise in the marginal cost of production for a barrel of oil. The exact costs per barrel are unknown – especially since no oil has begun flowing yet – but we do know that the project will produce some of the most expensive oil in the world.

And that is the problem for oil majors trying to replace aging and mature fields where production is declining. Old fields with lower marginal costs are being replaced with new expensive oil – whether it is from shale, offshore, or in the Arctic. When averaged across the industry, it becomes clear that the cost to produce a barrel of oil is rising and will probably continue to rise.

Related: Could Iran Be Trading Oil With Russia For Nuclear Support?

Over the past five years, the top three international oil companies spent a combined half-trillion dollars to develop new fields, but for many of the top companies, production has either stagnated or is slightly declining.

That does not bode well for shareholders over the long-term, particularly if oil prices do not rebound.

On the other hand, oil prices cannot stay as low as they are right now if the marginal cost continues to rise. At some point oil prices will force production offline and tighter supplies will bring prices back up. The key point is that the specific threshold for whether or not to bring an additional barrel of oil to market – the marginal cost of production – is rising. In other words, oil prices will always fluctuate, but the floor price for oil over the long-term will only go up.

And you only need to look at the mess with the Kashagan field to realize why that is the case.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News