• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 7 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 7 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 7 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 7 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Russia Goes All In On Arctic Oil Development

Fighting sanctions and low oil…

Alt Text

Big Oil Refuses To Give Up On The Barents Sea

Despite failures in the Barents…

Ryan Opsal

Ryan Opsal

Ryan Opsal is currently an Adjunct Lecturer and PhD Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University in Miami, FL, where he teaches on issues…

More Info

Why Venezuela’s Petro-Aggression In Guyana Is Being Largely Ignored

Why Venezuela’s Petro-Aggression In Guyana Is Being Largely Ignored

The border dispute between Guyana and Venezuela has been ongoing for around two centuries, and Venezuela still claims large, resource rich swathes of Guyanese territory. In the conflict’s most recent iteration, which began several months ago when Exxon Mobil (XOM) announced the discovery of oil off the coast of Guyana, Venezuela has renewed the same claims, with the same tactics, massing troops and war materials in the eastern portion of the country, close to the Guyanese border.

Despite an apparent easing of tensions, are oil and gas operations in this area – which include not only Exxon, but Anadarko (APC), Shell (RDS.A), and Repsol (REPYY) – under significant risk of being impacted by conflict or expropriation? Does Venezuela even want open warfare with Guyana?

What would compel Venezuela into conflict with another state at this point?

The literature on foreign policy generates many potential causes and contributing factors for Venezuela to engage in military operations against a neighboring state, but there are a few key reasons that stand out. Related: The Numbers Behind The Current Oil Rally

First, many states will engage in “rally ‘round the flag actions,” whereby conflict with a foreign entity distracts the domestic population from internal problems. Variations of this can range from a war of words, as we have seen in the latest version of this dispute so far, all the way up to open warfare.

There are also two oil-specific contributing factors why Venezuela would be open to conflict as a petro-state. Research conducted by Jeff Colgan of Brown University in 2013 categorized several types of “petro-aggression,” and two types apply to this situation: the existence of these reserves raise the payoffs of any military conflict or occupation, as with Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. The other form of petro-aggression is one of accountability. Venezuelan government relies on oil revenues for well over 90 percent of its annual budget, contributing to extremely low domestic accountability compared to other cases.

Finally, territorial disputes also serve to heighten tensions and serve as important contributing factors to recurring conflicts (think Kashmir).

All of these factors raise the potential of conflict, but what is the reality of the restraining factors acting on Venezuela? Related: Lithium Market Set To Explode – All Eyes Are On Nevada

Well, obviously, the economy is a major restraint. The Venezuelan economy is in a desperate situation. Any resources expended on supporting a foreign military operation would have a direct, real, and immediate impact on the resources available to the government for domestic patronage. This would put the ruling party’s power in further jeopardy.

Even if Venezuela saw an opportunity to seize territory without much trouble, it is not clear that such a move would be all that beneficial.

ExxonMobil’s discovery is 120 miles off the coast of Guyana. The rig itself is a deep-water rig drilled to 17,825 feet (5,433 meters) through 5,719 feet (1,743 meters) of water making this a fairly complex, technical operation requiring specialized knowledge, most likely not within the engineering capabilities of Venezuela’s PDVSA.

Barring any military action, Venezuela also has relatively few options in the legal realm. Exxon’s Liza well is actually located within Guyana’s exclusive economic zone on the southeastern portion of their waters, much closer to Suriname than Venezuela. Related: Has Oil Finally Bottomed?

On top of these formidable obstacles, any violation of Guyana’s territory would subject Venezuela would to international condemnation, limited regional censure, and potential additional sanctions, all of which would only contribute further destabilization factors to an already tenuous domestic situation.

So, what’s going on? What is driving Venezuelan saber rattling? The belligerent statements from the government of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro is symbolic, aimed at drumming up domestic support while distracting from the country’s economic failures.

As a bonus, Mr. Maduro also gets to lash out at an American energy company – two birds with one stone. The bottom line is, most international integrated energy companies have learned to conduct more realistic political risk scenarios for their multi-billion dollar operations, and in this case, Exxon’s deep-water operation, along with the other companies operating in the area, does not appear to be at risk of any Venezuelan action, militarily or otherwise.

By Ryan Opsal for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • BritBob on October 07 2015 said:
    Much of Venezuela's claim to Guyana's territory is based on her borders at the time of independence from Spain under the legal doctrine of uti possidetis juris. To see why this aspect of customary international law cannot readily be used by any court or tribunal dealing with any Guyana/Venezuela border dispute Google: 'Falklands' Uti Possidetis Juris & Nootka Sound Convention 1790 Academia/BritBob' (Argentina makes similar claims in respect of the Falklands).
  • Test on October 08 2015 said:
    People need to educate them selves about the current situation. The USA install dummy government into Guyana to destroy the country and force it into bankruptcy. Guyana is a basin collecting OIL from Venezuela since the lands of Guyana is much much lower than neighboring countries around it. Venezuela was Guyana biggest trade partners under the PPP government which they removed. Mostly exchanging rice/Sugar for OIL. USA will not buy or do any business with Guyana since USA does not need Sugar or rice (most are mass produce at a cheaper cost). Guyana economy is already sliding under the Ocean by the puppet government installed by the USA. This is exactly what the USA does around the world where OIL richness are present. After economy collapsed, they will take OIL from Guyana for almost free....
  • jess miller on October 09 2015 said:
    For those people ignoring the fact of History, the venezuelan claim over the Essequibo Region, which is only half of Guyana, started when Sir Walter Raleigh invaded and pillaged venezuelan towns and cities, looking for gold. Eventually he invaded the Essequibo Region which was part of Venezuela.
    Since then, Venezuela has claimed this at the International Courts without any luck.
    I think the patience of Venezuela is over, and military intervention is the only option.
    Venezuela has a powerful army equipped with modern Russian Tanks T-72, French Tanks AMX-30 and has the most formidable air force in Latin America with over 40 brand new russian Suhkoi SU-30 and 24 american F-16.
    The venezuelan army has over 400,000 troops and 2 million militias. The total population of Guyana is only 700,000. As we can see, Venezuela has the power to invade Guyana right now and celebrate victory in Georgetown during breakfast time.
  • howell clark on October 13 2015 said:
    boy oh boy are the liberal oil conspiracy boys out with this article. jess is a dreamer and test talks like an old commie adman for the politbureau. did either read the discovery prospects, and just who do they think will procure this oil even if the desires for venezuela came true. they can't even process a large percentage of their production now and have to ship it to the US for refining. where are their chinese saviours when they need them most. socialist saber rattlers. and mr miller you need to study history a little better as poor old raleigh paid with his head for his orinoco adventure and the attack on st thome and an apology by james for it to the spanish crown. and the spanish only stole it from the indians if ya'll really want to go revisionist socialist on us.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News