• 4 minutes Drone attacks cause fire at two Saudi Aramco facilities, blaze now under control
  • 7 minutes China Faces Economic Collapse
  • 13 minutes Oil Production Growth In U.S. Grinds To A Halt
  • 15 minutes Iran in the world market
  • 18 minutes Ethanol, the Perfect Home Remedy for A Saudi Oil Fever
  • 2 hours USA Wants Iran War -- Shooty Shooty More
  • 3 hours Collateral Damage: Saudi Disruption Leaves Canada's Biggest Refinery Vulnerable
  • 9 hours USA : Attack came from 'Iranian soil'. Pompeo to release 'evidence'.
  • 21 mins Experts review drone damage . Say Saudis need to do a lot of explaining.
  • 15 hours Never Bring A Rapier To A Gun Fight
  • 3 hours Yawn... Parliament Poised to Force Brexit Delay Until Jan. 31
  • 18 hours Bahrain - U.S.: Signed Deal To Buy Patriot Missiles
  • 20 hours One of the fire satellite pictures showed what look like the fire hit outside the main oil complex. Like it hit storage or pipeline facility. Not big deal.
  • 18 hours Trump Will Win In 2020 And Beyond..?
  • 20 hours How OPEC and OECD play their role in setting oil price in light of Iranian oil sanction ?? Does the world agree with Iran's oil sanctions ???
  • 18 hours Democrats and Gun Views
Alt Text

China Helps Venezuela Boost Oil Production

China has financed the construction…

Alt Text

A Dramatic U-Turn In Mexican Oil & Gas

Economic headwinds, a failing national…

Andy Tully

Andy Tully

Andy Tully is a veteran news reporter who is now the news editor for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

When Needs Must: EC Greenlights Canadian Oil Sands Imports

Canada’s oil sands have long had a problem: They not only emit greenhouse gases when they’re burned as fuel, but they also require resource-intensive scouring when they’re produced.

But are they dirty? Not according to the European Union, which Canada hopes will become a major customer of its abundant oil sands. On Oct. 7, the European Commission decided to scrap plans to designate them as dirtier than other forms of crude, opening the door for Canada to export oil to the energy-hungry bloc.

The original EU plan had been to penalize the fuel, which generates about 25 percent more carbon than ordinary crude. The EC decision removes the oil’s condition during production from the equation.

Related: Breakthrough In Oil Sands Waste Treatment

With that obstacle out of the way, thanks to intense lobbying by Ottawa, oil suppliers will be able to ship, and European refineries will be able to receive, huge amounts of Canadian oil.

Canada has only recently begun to ship oil to Europe, but the future looks bright for both seller and customer, in terms of revenues and reliable energy. In fact, that was a major argument in Canada’s lobbying effort: With Western relations with Russia worsening, the EU must look elsewhere for reliable sources of oil and gas.

Reuters quotes anonymous sources at the EU as saying the need for a trade deal with Canada had been a factor given the situation with Moscow.

Meanwhile, Canada’s been preparing to export its oil in huge volumes. First, it’s working on the Energy East Pipeline running from its western province of Alberta, rich in oil sands, to the country’s Atlantic oil ports.

It’s also been planning the Keystone XL pipeline stretching from its province of Alberta, rich in oil sands, through the United States and ending at Gulf of Mexico oil ports. The project has stalled, however, because of opposition and legal challenges from private citizens in the U.S.

Related: Is This $7.6 Billion Deal A Sign of Things Coming?

Harvesting oil sands is harder than simply drilling for crude. The dense sands must be dug out or blasted with steam before their oil content can be pumped to the surface. As a result, the process requires far more water and energy, and emits more greenhouse gases than conventional crude oil extraction.

Meanwhile, the EC’s decision isn’t absolutely final. It includes a proposal to assess the levels of pollution of any given fuel from its development to its end-use. If any fuel, including Canadian oil sands, is found to be incompatible with the EU’s climate goals, then the EC will propose unspecified remedial action.

As EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said in a statement, “The Commission is today giving this another push, to try and ensure that in the future, there will be a methodology and thus an incentive to choose less-polluting fuels over more polluting ones like, for example, oil sands.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Reality on October 09 2014 said:
    Praise God Reality is finally dawning in Europe!

    Putin = DIRTY

    Oil Sands = FREEDOM!

    BIG OIL and the US need to start standing for Freedom, and stop living in an dream world that doesn't exist. Putin, ISIS, EBOLA,... just a few of the real problems that are out there.
  • Facts would be nice on October 09 2014 said:
    Facts would be nice. Opening statements like: "Canada’s oil sands have long had a problem: They not only emit greenhouse gases when they’re burned as fuel, but they also require resource-intensive scouring when they’re produced.". Newsflash! Combustion of all fuels, whether from Canada, the Middle East, or Asia all create green house gases. In fact, combustion through an internal combustion engine is where the majority of all GHG's are generated regardless of source.

    Also, less than 20% of Canada's heavy oil can be mined (or as termed above "scouring"). The majority of it is going to have to be recovered in-situ (in the ground using wells), results in less environmental impact from a surface footprint standpoint and less water usage (70-90% of the water for insitu-recovery is recycled as dictated by law).

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play