• 2 minutes CV19: New York 21% infection rate + 40% Existing T-Cell immunity = 61% = Herd Immunity ?
  • 4 minutes Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 7 minutes Sources confirm Trump to sign two new Executive orders.
  • 3 hours Is the oil & gas industry on the way out?
  • 40 mins COVID is real now
  • 13 hours In a Nutshell...
  • 18 hours Better Days Are (Not) Coming: Fed Officials Suggest U.S. Recovery May Be Stalling
  • 14 hours Australian renewables zone attracts 27 GW of solar, wind, battery proposals
  • 2 days Where is Alberta, Canada headed?
  • 4 hours The Boris Yeltsin of America
  • 3 days No More Love: Kanye West Breaks With Trump, Claims 2020 Run Is Not A Stunt
  • 24 hours Why Oil could hit $100
  • 3 days Putin Paid Militants to Kill US Troops
  • 3 days During March, April, May the states with the highest infections/deaths were NY, NJ, Ma. . . . . Today (June) the three have the best numbers. How ? Herd immunity ?
  • 3 days The Coal Industry May Never Recover From The Pandemic
  • 3 days A Real Reality Check on "Green Hydrogen"
Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Premium Content

What Happens If U.S. Shale Goes Bust?

This month has seen a spectacular oil price crash the likes of which we haven't seen in decades. The last time we had since a single day oil price drop as drastic as Monday, March 9 was way back in 1991, when the U.S. launched airstrikes directed at the Iraqi military in response to the invasion of Kuwait. The price drop earlier this month was similarly staggering, with Brent benchmark global oil prices down by 22 percent and United States prices down by 20 percent.  This cataclysmic crash was caused by a perfect storm of market-spooking factors: the accelerating global spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and the continuing oil price war being waged by Saudi Arabia after the OPEC+ alliance, which formed in 2016 to include Russia, imploded at the beginning of this month. The implosion itself was caused by coronavirus, as the plummeting oil demand caused by the industry- and economy-stalling pandemic led Russia and Saudi Arabia to initiate talks to address the issue, which subsequently led to bitter disagreement and an ultimate disbanding of the alliance and then an all-out price war. 

The oil price war and subsequent crash have had devastating effects on U.S. shale, which was already struggling with diminishing profit margins. “Few U.S. shale firms can withstand prolonged oil price war,” Reuters proclaimed last week. “For the last five years, U.S. shale oil producers have been battling suppliers for lower costs and running equipment and crews hard to drive drilling costs down by about $20 a barrel,” the article reports. “The oil market rout last week, however, has left most shale firms facing prices below their costs of production.”

Subsequent news out of the Permian Basin has been grim, with World Oil reporting this week that “Shale plays, oil patch see tens of thousands of layoffs across the industry.” According to analysis by Texas Railroad Commissioner Ryan Sitton, tens of thousands of oil industry workers are being laid off across Texas, and World Oil writes that “while workers in just about every industry are threatened by the economic slowdown, few are more at risk than those in the oil patch.”

Related: Barclays Slashes Oil Price Forecast On Demand Shock

This news is what is leading a lot of us to ask, what would happen if the U.S. shale industry goes bankrupt? This is exactly the question that Robert Rapier sets about answering in an opinion column for Forbes this week. “The real consequences of letting the U.S. shale industry fail is to hand global control of oil production back to Saudi Arabia. Millions of Americans will lose jobs, domestic oil production will fall, and our oil imports will soar. Saudi Arabia will then be free to once again withhold production to drive up the price.” While some shale companies in the U.S. will inevitably go bankrupt in the coming months, if too much of the industry fails it could have a lasting negative impact on the United States’ national security. Ultimately, he argues, letting U.S. oil collapse is far too risky in the short term, even if moving away from fossil fuels is, ultimately, a net good.

“Look, you may think the U.S. oil industry deserves to go bankrupt. You may believe we should all be driving around in wind-powered electric vehicles or riding bicycles. But that’s not the world we live in today,” he writes. “Should we use less oil? Yes. And we will over time. But right now the U.S. still uses a lot of oil, and we will continue to do so for several years, even as we transition to electric vehicles.”

On the other hand, as oil is proving to be an increasingly volatile sector, and even Saudi Aramco is talking about peak oil by mid-century, isn’t it high time to let go? As climate action increases, the Financial Times warning that this oil crash is “only a foretaste of what awaits energy industry,” maybe it’s time to read the writing on the wall and more seriously divest from oil in favor of creating jobs and infrastructure in more progressive and forward-leaning energy sectors.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Bradley Steeg on March 24 2020 said:
    If Shale wants to survive they should get creative and become net zero with Allam cycle natural gas plants powering air carbon capture and using the CO2 to enhance oil extraction. That way they could talk Europe and other advanced economies into mandating purchases of net zero oil from the Permian.

    Short term, let Shale go belly up. New investors can restart it later. Will our imports increase? Yes, at low prices. Let's use their oil for now and make our oil better for later.
  • Henry Hewitt on March 24 2020 said:
    Thanks Haley,

    One would like to think that Forbes could do better. Alas: "You may believe we should all be driving around in wind-powered electric vehicles or riding bicycles. But that’s not the world we live in today.”

    Oi. The longer these dudes remain clueless the lower the prices, not just for oil, will go. I'll have you know my bicycle is powered by Dr. Pepper and my car by ultraviolet. Remember Leslie Gore? "Sunshine, megawatts, and windmills everywhere . . ."
  • things change on March 25 2020 said:
    with EVs bound to take over, this virus will just hasten the inevitable. with battery costs dropping, EVs will pretty soon be cheaper than gas cars. green tech already employs more people than oil in the US. so workers can shift into the work of the future. its not like Saudi oil will be doing much better. oil will drop to $15/brl or less. us will pull out from the middle east. Saudi and Iran will duke. it out and cause chaos in that region. that's why China is accelerating it's EV push. best that us transitions quickly away from oil.
  • Arch Region on March 25 2020 said:
    You may deride that we should all be driving around in wind-powered electric vehicles or riding bicycles. But this is precisely what is going to happen before the decade that barely started is over. Fossil fuels are unaffordable if you calculate cost associated with their toxic air pollution if factor their costs in to the price of using oil.
    - While the scrubbers removed 91% of the Sulphur Dioxide from emissions the 9% is not zero . Acid rain continues damage to human health, agriculture, forestry, buildings, and car finishes.
    - While scrubbers remove 62% NOx compounds they still leave 38% to harm our kids health. Life long asthma is not a laughing matter. Health care is not cheap.
    - 45% of cancer causing Volatile Organic Compounds are part of the cost of using oil.
    - And of course the big giant elephant in the room CO2 impact on the global climate holocaust.

    When there were no alternatives, and when we knew so little about the cost of pollution sacrificing human health for economic benefit made sense. But this faustian trade off is not necessary anymore.
  • Eric Smith on March 25 2020 said:
    The problems shale has right now have nothing to do with global warming and neither should the solution. With that said, I am not in favor of saving shale. To save it you would have to support it for 3 years with many many billions. When it makes sense new investors will quickly get into the market in a much shorter time frame then saving it
  • Frank Weiss on March 25 2020 said:
    If shale goes bust, shale goes bust. Looks like the US has been autarkic in oil products for a bit. If the country becomes a net oil importer at the new low world price, the country as a whole is better off [though not shale, but the overwhelming majority of us have nothing to do with shale].

    Gimme cheap gas! :-)

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News