• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 2 mins China has invested btw $30 - $40 Billon in Canadian Oil Sands. Trump should put 10% tariffs on all Chinese oil exported into or thru U.S. in which Chinese companies have invested .
  • 15 hours Iran Is Winning Big In The Middle East
  • 2 hours Tit For Tat: China Strikes Back In Trade Dispute With U.S. With New Tariffs
  • 3 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 2 hours It's Not the Job of the Government to Dictate Where Businesses Should Go
  • 17 hours Not The Onion: Vivienne Westwood Says Greta Thunberg Should Run the World
  • 16 hours IS ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST WAR REQUIRED TO BOLSTER THE OIL PRICE
  • 1 day OPEC will consider all options. What options do they have ?
  • 1 day Trump cancels Denmark visit amid spat over sale of Greenland
  • 13 hours Strong, the Strongest: Audi To Join Mercedes, BMW Development Alliance
  • 14 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 1 day Long Range Attack On Saudi Oil Field Ends War On Yemen
  • 9 hours Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
Alt Text

Alberta Extends Oil Production Cuts

Alberta has announced an extension…

Alt Text

OPEC Oil Production Continues To Slide As Saudis Cut Deeper

OPEC’s crude oil production fell…

Alt Text

The Bullish EIA Message Markets Have Overlooked

U.S. shale hasn’t just introduced…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Premium Content

Trump’s Atlantic Drilling Plan May Be A Lost Cause

A key public comment period just ended for revising the offshore exploration program along the U.S. Atlantic Coast, and the path forward might not be as smooth as the Trump administration had hoped.

The Department of Interior, which regulates offshore drilling and also conducts lease sales to the industry, had closed off the possibility of drilling in the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans during the Obama era. But President Trump has tried to move quickly to reverse that decision, kicking off the process to open up the Atlantic for exploration.

But the President can’t just open up the Atlantic at the stroke of a pen – there is a protracted legal and regulatory process that the Department of Interior must go through. One step of that process just came to a close.

The Interior publishes five-year plans, which detail what offshore areas under federal control they will auction off. The public comment period for the 2019-2024 five year plan ended last week.

Because drilling has not occurred along the Atlantic Coast, unlike the Gulf Coast, it was always going to be controversial to open up the region for exploration. To be sure, industry groups, such as the American Petroleum Institute, support Atlantic drilling. They also argue that other areas that are off limits – including the Arctic and offshore Florida – should also be opened up.

But opposition is growing and it is coming from a lot more places than the Trump administration likely expected.

For example, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe (D) opposes drilling, both on concerns that an oil spill will foul the coastline and because of the federal government’s stance on revenue sharing. He added that he would be more open to allowing drilling if coastal states were given a greater slice of the pie, although conceded that such an outcome is unlikely. In the past, McAuliffe has supported offshore drilling, and he is the only Democrat on the Outer Continental Shelf Governors Coalition, which supports energy development in the Atlantic.

Related: Oil Prices Boosted By String Of Bullish News

But it is the opposition from more Republican-friendly states that are raising eyebrows. For example, coastal communities in both North and South Carolina are lining up against the Atlantic drilling. According to E&E News, an expanding coalition of coastal business interests, fishing and tourist industries, municipal and state governments, residents, and environmentalists are building a “wall of resistance” that is bipartisan in nature. E&E News reports that every municipal mayor in coastal South Carolina oppose the Trump administration’s plan to open up the Atlantic.

As a result, with an eye on their own constituents, the state governments are also coming out against Atlantic drilling. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster (R) has opposed drilling. North Carolina’s governor Roy Cooper (D) opposes drilling – he was elected last year, replacing his drilling-friendly predecessor.

Even South Carolina’s two Republican Senators, Lindsey Graham and Tim Scott, have been quiet on the issue. Normally allies of the oil and gas industry, they have taken a back seat as South Carolina residents have increasingly opposed drilling plans.

"Look, they can see the handwriting on the wall with opposition from their constituents," Frank Knapp, president and CEO of both the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce, told E&E News in an interview. "Why would they go out on a limb and do that? That doesn't mean they're opposing it — it means that they're shifted into a neutral position, but, hey look, that's an achievement. ... Turn the clock back 12 months and they would have signed it in a heartbeat." A few Republican members of the U.S. Congress from North and South Carolina have also come out against Atlantic drilling. Related: Has Gulf Of Mexico Production Peaked?

Meanwhile, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (R), a strong ally of President Trump, also officially came out against drilling last week.

All of this unexpected opposition does not mean that Atlantic drilling is doomed. Katharine MacGregor, acting assistant secretary for Interior, told reporters last week that the agency is not close to making a final determination on Atlantic drilling. The next step is to sift through all of the public comments and issue a draft five-year plan.

In other words, it will likely be years before the oil and gas industry can start drilling in the Atlantic, even in the best case scenario. But even then, it is unclear if there will be any interest. The Atlantic has not been explored very much, and as a result, the exact nature of the oil and gas reserves in place is unknown. That likely means that development costs will be high. If oil prices fail to rise much from current levels, it is not at all clear that the Atlantic will be very competitive.

In a world of $50 oil and too much supply, a new expensive frontier would struggle to attract a lot of drillers. But, the political opposition to Atlantic drilling might make that a moot point.

By Nick Cunningham, Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • SrilaBS on August 22 2017 said:
    whatever areas are gonna be opened up....the Arctic zone will not be ....nope not as yet, save the best for last! when exports might just turn out to be far far greater to trade and when in-house needs have gone the green way i guess

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play