• 4 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 8 minutes Read: OPEC WILL KILL US SHALE
  • 12 minutes Tidal Power Closer to Commercialisation
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 2 hours Why U.S. Growers Are Betting The Farm On Soybeans Amid China Trade War
  • 15 hours Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 7 hours US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 16 hours BATTLE ROYAL: Law of "Supply and Demand". vs. OPEC/Saudi Oil Cartel
  • 1 day THE DEATH OF FOSSIL FUEL MARKETS
  • 1 day Solar to Become World's Largest Power Source by 2050
  • 17 hours Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 2 days this is why Climate Friendly Agendas Tread Water
  • 2 days Boeing Faces Safety Questions After Second 737 Crash In Five Months
  • 15 hours Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 1 day Exxon Aims For $15-a-Barrel Costs In Giant Permian Operation
  • 2 days Sounds Familiar: Netanyahu Tells Arab Citizens They’re Not Real Israelis
Alt Text

The Next Major Flashpoint For U.S. Shale

Colorado’s overhaul of oil &…

Alt Text

Is U.S. Oil Returning To China?

U.S. crude oil exports to…

Alt Text

Refining Frenzy Worsens Fuel Glut In Asia

The oil products glut in…

Nawar Alsaadi

Nawar Alsaadi

Nawar Alsaadi is a principal at Semper Augustus Capital, a private investment firm with a special focus on the energy sector. He is also a…

More Info

Trending Discussions

The New Oil Order

In the decades preceding the arrival of U.S. shale oil, the oil market had only one stabilizing force, namely OPEC. The reason the oil market was structured as such was due to the nature of conventional oil production, most non-OPEC oil production prior to U.S. shale oil fell in one of two categories: major offshore projects that took 5 to 7 years to build (North Sea, Gulf of Mexico … etc.) or mature conventional onshore fields (U.S. conventional fields, Russian Siberian fields … etc.); both of these conventional oil supply sources were either non-responsive, or only slowly reactive, to changes in the oil price, major offshore oil projects tended to come online regardless of the oil price environment, while conventional onshore oil production with shallow decline rates (sub-10 percent) meant that even a slowdown in drilling would not impact total production in any meaningful way for an extended period of time.

The aforementioned state of affairs meant that it was up to OPEC to adjust production to balance the market in case of abrupt supply or demand changes, OPEC had (and still has) the flexibility to withdraw millions of barrels from the market within a month or two if such a need arose (OPEC withdrawing 4m barrels from the market following the financial crisis in 2008/2009 is a case in point).

The arrival of U.S. shale oil in size to the scene in 2014 has upended the OPEC/non-OPEC balancing act, by introducing a medium-term oil supply balancing mechanism that in the long run will prove supportive to the oil market, and especially so to non-shale oil producers.

Analysis

Non-OPEC production trends following the oil crash in 2014 are instrumental in demonstrating the points discussed in the introduction. Following the oil crash of late 2014, U.S. crude production (lower 48 ex-GOM) declined by one million barrels (EIA data) between December 2014 and December 2016:

(Click to enlarge)

Shale oil which represented 70 percent of U.S. crude production on December 2014 (5.23M barrels) declined by 690K barrels, representing a 13 percent decline during that same time frame. U.S. shale oil production declined by 5.2 percent in the first year to 4.97M barrels (December 2015), and then declined by an additional 8.6 percent in the following year to 4.54M (December 2016). Related: Venezuela: A Real Threat To Guyana's Oil Boom

The decline in U.S. shale oil stands in contrast to oil production in the Gulf of Mexico, which increased by 18 percent from 1.45M to 1.72M barrels during the same period due to the long-lead nature of the offshore production:

(Click to enlarge)

The same applies to non-OPEC production ex-U.S., with production remaining flat between Dec 2014 and Dec 2016 at around 43.5M barrels:

(Click to enlarge)

Please note the production swoon in May 2016 to 42.5M was mainly due to unplanned outages in Canada due to forest fires, and is not related to oil prices.

As can be seen, both GOM and Non-OPEC (ex-U.S.) crude production were non-responsive to changes in oil prices. This is not to say these basins won’t respond to low oil prices - eventually, they will - but with a lag that could take between 3 and 5 years. We should see the impact of these declines by 2020 at the latest.

U.S. shale oil dynamics

It is clear that U.S. shale oil production is the most responsive free market oil to changes in oil prices. As U.S. shale oil production comes to represent a bigger piece of the pie in the global oil supply picture, its elastic characteristics will increasingly have a major impact on the global oil market. But before going into that let's take a closer look at the numbers (EIA data).     

In December 2014, U.S. shale oil production stood at 5.23M barrels, with a total monthly legacy decline rate of 300K barrels per month. The legacy decline rate is what U.S. shale producers must replace every month to keep production flat. Net U.S. shale oil production growth that month stood at 114K barrels, to achieve that growth 414K barrels were brought online, 72 percent of which went to compensate for legacy declines. Today U.S. shale oil production stands at 8.03M barrels, with a total monthly decline rate of 530K barrels. U.S. shale producers increased production by 114K barrels in December 2018; to achieve this, new production came in at 644K barrels, 82 percent of which went to compensate for legacy declines. This last point is key: with 82 percent of U.S. shale oil production going to replace declines (as compared to 72 percent in 2014), means only 18 percent of new U.S. shale oil production is contributing to the net growth in U.S. supply.

Related: Low Oil Prices Could Cripple Texas Job Growth

Following the experience of 2015/2016, most market observers agree that U.S. shale production can’t grow meaningfully with WTI under $50 a barrel, WTI averaged under $50 both in 2015 ($48) and 2016 ($43). Thus, with WTI trading under $50 WTI today, it's fair to assume that U.S. shale growth will either slow in the coming months, or contract should prices remain here. As indicated earlier, U.S. shale oil production today is much larger, and with a much bigger legacy decline rate than in 2014; this means that a slight decrease in activity could have an outsized impact on total U.S. production. To illustrate this point, we can proceed with a theoretical example, if we were to assume the slowdown in U.S. shale activity was to slow new production growth from 644K barrels per month to 580K by the end of Q1/2019, the net annualized growth in U.S. production would decrease from roughly 1.3m barrels per year to 600K per year or a 54 percent decline. Obviously, the numbers are not static, the underlying legacy decline rate will eventually slow down as new production slows down, but directionally the example is very telling. Furthermore, to put such U.S. decline in context, a slowdown of 50 percent in U.S. production growth would wipe out 51 percent of the expected 1.5m non-OPEC production growth projected for next year (IEA OMR December 2018).

What’s important to keep in mind is that as U.S. production grows, and as legacy declines continue to cannibalize a larger portion of new U.S. shale oil production, U.S. production becomes increasingly sensitive to slight changes in drilling and completion activity. Those relatively small changes can have major implications for global oil balances. This situation is unprecedented in the history of the oil market for no global oil supply source has ever matched the sharp decline rate associated with U.S. shale oil production.     

Long-Term Implications

As we have seen from the above, U.S. shale oil is highly responsive to changes in oil prices, this, in turn, introduces a new balancing force in the global oil market, a force that acts as a floor should prices decline under $50 a barrel (the economic threshold to produce shale oil). This same force also acts as a ceiling should prices rise above $70 WTI, with most shale fields becoming profitable at that price point.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the implications of the shale phenomenon are quite positive for non-shale oil companies. Its true that U.S. shale oil introduces an upper band to oil prices, however, this is not a negative since sharp spikes in oil prices are generally harmful for the global economy and for oil demand growth; this is especially the case in an age where electrified transportation is gaining market share. Most importantly, U.S. shale oil’s reactivity to price declines represents an economic floor to oil prices that will supplement OPEC efforts to balance the oil market: barring OPEC, oil prices could decline to extreme levels, exactly as happened in early 2016, with WTI trading as low as $26 a barrel with OPEC opting to stand still. Having a free market oil price stabilizing force as described is a boon for conventional producers, many of whom can generate strong returns within the $50-$70 shale oil price band. Prior to the arrival of U.S. shale oil, OPEC was the oil market only security lever, today U.S. shale oil present another lever. This added downside protection underpins non-shale operators’ cash flows during the lower leg of the cycle. As capital markets gain confidence in non-shale operators cash flows at the trough, the most dangerous part of the commodity cycle, valuations in the non-shale oil sector should increase, rather than decrease as they have been of late due to a fundamental misunderstanding regarding the balancing role of U.S. shale in the oil market.     

Longer term, U.S. shale oil’s upper band will cease to be a factor as U.S. shale oil production plateaus in the 9/10m barrels range in the early 2020s. In that ideal scenario, shale oil will continue to be a downside balancing force while losing its ability to cap the market on the upside due to logistical and geological constraints. Having U.S. shale oil downside protection without having it flood the market on the upside is a magnificent gift to OPEC, and other conventional oil producers. 

By Nawar Alsaadi for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Frank on January 01 2019 said:
    To recap shale has now put a cap on Brent at $60-70 and internal combustion vehicle sales have peaked globally, but this will be a positive for non-shale companies and will lead to "capital markets gain confidence in non-shale operators"?

    That seems.......unlikely.
  • Jim Miceli on January 01 2019 said:
    Lets just say that no US Oil Company can sustain the present Oil Price at 45.70 plus or minus 1.00. It doesn't matter how much volume reaches the consumer , Oil Companies have to make different fuels , etc.. Take auto gas , aviation gases , oils etc. and to what ratio per one barrel of Oil. No way. WTI itself should be at $53 to $55 per barrel at present with upside toward 60.00 per barrel. Bankruptcy.
  • Dennis Wormsbecher on January 02 2019 said:
    Very interesting article.
    It seems to focus on the deliberate actions of the shale drillers to expand or contract their capex budgets. But have you ever thought about the implications when shale drillers are not able to control the production changes.
    At some point in the, not to distant, future the prime shale acreage will become less available.
    If a drop of 10% in shale gross production growth will result in a decline of minimal 50% in total shale production growth.
    Then this will have mayor global consequences for total oil supply and the oil price..
  • Disgruntled on January 02 2019 said:
    People write about US shale oil as if it will be a significant factor going forward indefinitely. What I think most people are missing is that the very fact that we are officially scraping the bottom of the barrel when we drill up these shales, aka, source rocks. Once you've completely exploited your source rocks, you can stick a fork in it cause you're done. What no one is addressing is when this will take place. Of course, the price of oil determines much of when this will take place as even crappy source rocks might be viable at $200/b and would conceivably extend the timeline. But if the OPEC continues to keep a lid on prices then the endgame will be sooner rather than later as far as the contribution of US shale oil to global supply.
  • Dan Pearson on January 02 2019 said:
    One of the best articles on how to view US shale oil as a control mechanism to keep world oil prices range bound between $60 - $80 Brent, which is reasonable for conventional producers to have FCF. The dual levered mechanism of OPEC and US shale oil production band prices is very thought provoking.

    This is definitely a more unique way to look at US shale oil and its impact on conventional oil price bands and associated controlling world shale oil volumes. Nice article. Regards.
  • Dan on January 03 2019 said:
    Given the nature of the Permian WSJ article about most wells being up to 63% less production than forecasts, the article is spot on and the acceleration of decline increases dramatically as much higher oil prices are needed given the shortfall in real production of any Permian well in order to drill more. $100 or nothing should be the slogan for the Permian, just don't tell Washington happy faces. The ride in oil prices should be on a trip to Mars.
  • Tony on January 04 2019 said:
    The new oil order ???? I will believe this when US stop to import every day 13 millions of Barrels !
    What a joke, and someone believes this US Show !
  • Paul Bouchard on January 20 2019 said:
    Im going to argue that a glut is a glut,
    OPEC is caught in a supply and demand bell curve,
  • Zak Bullard on January 29 2019 said:
    "Generally, 2-8 million gallons of water may be used to frack a well. Some wells consume much more. A well may be fracked multiple times, with each frack increasing the chances of chemical leakage into the soil and local water sources"
    No wonder, that big swats of land are changing to desert. At this rate of water usage, I wonder what will we run out of first, oil/gas, or water. The interesting thing is, that the environmental lobby in the US is not touching this subject at all. Why? Drill baby drill:))

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News