• 3 minutes War for Taiwan?
  • 7 minutes How China Is Racing To Expand Its Global Energy Influence
  • 10 minutes Is it time to talk about Hydrogen?
  • 5 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 2 days Mail IN Ballot Fraud
  • 12 hours Supreme Court rules against Cuomo's coronavirus limits
  • 9 hours “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 3 days Michael Moore Cranking Up Planet of the Humans Again
  • 4 hours Saudi Arabia Seeks to Become Top Hydrogen Exporter
  • 8 hours Biden's Green New Deal- Short Term - How Will He Start to Transition Out Of Crude?
  • 2 days Censorship in USA
  • 2 days “Consumers Will Pay For Carbon Pricing Costs” by Irina Slav
Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

The Future Landscape Of U.S. Oil

Crude oil last week dived below $40 as the resurgence of Covid-19 cases in Europe prompted new national lockdowns in France and Germany—so far. Yet fears have deepened that more countries could follow. Lockdowns are not good for oil demand. And they are just one aspect of the pandemic that is changing the oil industry landscape.

The United States has not reinstated lockdowns and is quite unlikely to do it. Yet people’s behaviors are changing because of the pandemic, and some of these new behaviors may be here to stay, with their effect on crude oil fundamentals becoming long-term. How will the U.S. oil industry look a year from now?

Fewer and even leaner

The consolidation many expected has finally started, driven in part by the logic-based optimism that prices will have to sooner or later start recovering, and in part by political concerns.

The potential change in administration could result in regulatory and environmental policy changes, too, as well as tax regime changes, says Nicholas Renter, Datasite VP of Sales. The possibility of a tax reform already fueled a surge in M&A deals, Renter noted, and this pace of dealmaking could continue through the end of this year.

The upcoming election is one big source of uncertainty over the immediate future of the oil industry.

“How the future of the oil and gas industry looks a year from now will depend partly on the outcome of the U.S. presidential elections. A Biden win will likely drive a rush for companies to implement decarbonization strategies, spurring investments in green/renewable energy,” said Sarah McLean, partner in Shearman & Sterling’s energy group.

According to David Johnston, partner, US-West Energy Strategy and Transactions Leader, Ernst & Young LLP, the M&A wave we are witnessing took root before the pandemic. Many industry players with strong balance sheets, he told Oilprice, were looking to acquire assets even before the coronavirus emerged.

And now, “With economic activity globally beginning to see a resurgence and continued low commodity prices, it has allowed companies to run through a process and determine if executing a deal now would lead to greater value down the road. This is particularly true in U.S. shale where operators can be a bit more nimble and adjust production to meet demand,” Johnston said. Related: Can Ecuador Save Its Ailing Oil Sector?

A year from now, then, there will be a lot fewer players in the U.S. oil field. “A lot” because bankruptcies will likely continue. So far this year, they are fewer than the all-time high of 142 reached in 2016, according to Haynes and Boone data. However, they are still rising and, as Rystad Energy reported earlier this month, the combined debt of U.S. and Canadian companies that have shut shop since the start of the year is at a record high of $89 billion.

The uncertainty about demand created by the coronavirus pandemic has compromised many companies’ ability to raise capital and fund acquisitions. For some, however, this is the time of opportunity, according to Shearman & Sterling’s McLean, as they could ramp up their assets at attractive valuations. These lucky few will dominate the future oil landscape.

Automated world

The oil landscape of 2021 will not only be less crowded, but it will also be more digitalized and automated. The industry was already reaping the benefits of digital tech and automation before the pandemic—motivated to a significant extent by the last crisis when costs again had to be cut deep, and automation helped.

Now, the trend is accelerating because of the pandemic, says E.Y.’s Johnston, and it is accelerating across the oil and gas value chain.

“Increasing automation in field and equipment operations will be key (i.e., pipelines, gas plants, refineries, production wells),” Vicki Knott, chief executive of automation services provider Crux OCM, told Oilprice. “As head count reduces, the only way to maintain profit margins is to increase the level of automation for human workload. I anticipate the landscape to be more heavily focused on leveraging automation as a solution.”

Full automation of some operations is on the horizon as those that survive the downturn seek to make their operations ever more flexible to boost their resilience in the face of price volatility. This will just be one more priority on the agendas of those companies that are today buying smaller rivals because they have the money to do it and because acquisitions could fuel their future growth in a way that organic growth currently cannot achieve.

Peak gasoline demand

The U.S. may have seen peak gasoline demand, says Brian Milne, DTN Energy Editor, Analyst. Shocking as this may sound to those closely following the EIA’s weekly petroleum and fuel inventory update, peak gasoline demand may well be just one more consequence of the pandemic.

“Once the pandemic dissipates as the United States reaches the critical herd immunity stage, upstream and downstream oil companies will need to understand the behavioral changes that have occurred, and in what will continue,” Milne told Oilprice. “Top of mind is the staying power of work-from-home following the pandemic that could have a long term dramatic effect on gasoline demand. Another critical uncertainty is when flying activity returns to its pre-pandemic level.” Related: This Huge Gas Field Is Critical To Russia’s Middle East Agenda

There is also a twist: the latest news from medical research on the coronavirus suggests that herd immunity may not be happening. A study from the U.K.’s Imperial College London found the level of antibodies in Covid-19 patients declined over time. This makes secondary infection a clear possibility and flies in the face of hopes for a vaccine with a permanent effect.

This, in turn, means behavioral changes will likely deepen, which will give them longer staying power. And this will inevitably have an effect on oil demand, among other things. In this context, the idea that we are past peak gasoline demand does not look as far-fetched as it may have without it.

Return to normal

Right now, investments in oil are being slashed as companies switch on their survival mode. But these low investments, notes DTN’s Milne, would eventually lead to a tightening of supply, which, in turn, will push prices higher. The industry will likely begin to return to normal. Only it won’t be the old normal.

Digitalization is one facet of the new normal that is already emerging. A potentially significant reduction in the number of industry players is another. A greater focus on alternative energy sources is also likely inevitable as pressure increases from regulators and some legislators and state governors. Lenders and investors are turning their backs on oil because they want something greener to spend their money on. Oil, then, needs to change.

Again, this change was already underway before the pandemic, which only quickened its pace. Refineries were already being converted into biodiesel production facilities before the virus started spreading, DTN’s Milne said. Now they are doing it faster. This means refining capacity—which was in excess before the pandemic—is unlikely to return to pre-pandemic levels. And this suggests production is also not returning to pre-pandemic levels. There may not be a Shale 3.0, at least in terms of production levels.

According to a recent Datasite survey among 150 global dealmakers, the energy industry in the U.S. stands to win if Trump wins a second term. Yet it will be a limited win. The U.S. oil industry is changing, and it was changing even before the pandemic. For all the support a second Trump administration would have for fossil fuels, some state governments are going firmly in a different direction, with their journey fueled by solar and wind power. The oil industry will need to navigate a changing landscape, and as a result, it will change, too, and fast. 

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on November 02 2020 said:
    When talking about the future landscape of US Oil, one has to distinguish between established oil majors like ExxonMobil and Chevron and the US shale oil industry.

    US majors will have no alternative but to drastically cut dividends and implement an asset writedown programme like their European counterparts if they are to avoid sinking deeper in outstanding debts. They have also to cut costs and allocate their diminishing cash resources to the core business that sustains them, namely oil and gas.

    The US shale oil industry will emerge leaner but will be kept alive on a life support machine provided and financed by US taxpayers because it is an $8-trillion industry employing 2% of the American work force and helping offset some of US crude oil imports. Therefore, it is very important to the US economy.

    Yet, it has to adapt to a new code of practice based on a sensible production to generate profit for shareholders and investors and following the rules of economics to become viable rather than letting politics with delusional slogans like ‘American energy independence’, ‘the world’s largest oil producer’ and ‘energy dominance’ prevail over sensible economics. In other words, it needs to let economics trump politics. Moreover, it will need an oil price above $70 a barrel to offset a breakeven price of $48-$68 a barrel.

    And while a Biden win will see some of the environmental and financial regulations that have been loosened under the Trump administration reinstated, he will continue to have a softly-softly approach to fracking because of the importance of the shale oil industry to the US economy.

    Still, neither Biden nor Trump has any influence on the US oil industry. The fundamentals of the global oil market are the ones that determine the future of the industry.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Carlos Everett on November 02 2020 said:
    I thought i would add comments made by an engineer that provided updates on my efforts to go Solar. As you remember, i live in Houston area, 7,000 square foot home and used 64,800 KWH last year. I asked a broker to provide estimates to switch to solar and i was very serious, yet my monthly bill is $550, yet the best estimate was $90,000 after incentives and my loan payment would be $587/month before any maintenance. It does not take a rocket scientist , to determine that journalist stating that solar cost reductions have reduced over the past 10 years have been reduced by 80-90% reduction is not accurate.

    So i went to another company in Houston, who states they have installed 5,000 solar panels in homes in Houston homes over the past 5 years.

    This gentleman was very nice and we discussed several ways we could install, with even incorporating the idea of sticking panels on poles in my backyard as i own an acre of land, plus using my roof to be able to have plenty of space to gather the sun energy from both my roof panels and any panels that would be installed on poles in my yard. To make a long story short, the panels which supposedly have been reduced in cost by 80-90% is not really a true statement and to gather enough solar energy is not possible, so i cannot realize the savings on my roof, even with solar energy panels which supposedly being reduced in cost by 80-90% in costs. The gentleman laid out my costs and what savings and he said the numbers do not work for me.

    I am a accountant graduated in a top 20 accounting school in the nation, of the 65 students in our accounting class 40 students took the CPA exam and 25 passed all four parts which is unheard of %. I also have an MBA.

    Comments that solar energy costs are being reduced by 80-90% are not accurate and journalists who make these statements are not verifying their facts, and they obviously have an agenda as these numbers are easily verified. For a person to issue statements that costs are competitive with other forms of energy are not accurate. If you have a question concerning these issues, you should verify the facts.

    I would challenge, Irivina Slav, the author of this article, to verify my facts and comments and to ask her to state that she can independently verify that solar costs have been reduced by 80-90%, which based on my independent analysis is not accurate.

    Irivina, it is time for you investigate the facts and question whether solar panels are in fact reducing their costs by 80-90%.

    I will be happy to provide the name of my broker and then the latest engineer so that you can independently check my facts

    I am very disappointed that Oilprice.com does not have their facts together, and are issuing fraudulent facts that are not independently verified, and would suggest that the author is not issuing factual statements! I would suggest more research needs to occur, and that the solar replacement of oil and gas is something that needs much more investigation
  • Richard H on November 03 2020 said:
    The total debt of Alberta's Tar Sands projects is reported, by companies and issued by right-wing collaborator provincial government in 2018, at more than $125 billion. Only Syncrude, out of 24 companies, shows consistent profits. Several projects show debts of more than $15 billion. So Rystad completely missed the market with their bogus estimate of 'the combined debt of U.S. and Canadian companies that HAVE SHUT SHOP since the start of the year is at a record high of $89 billion.' But then, that was always intended as a misleading 'statistic' designed to minimize the hopeless debts of fossil fuel companies by focussing only on already bankrupt, non-operating companies.

    This doesn't matter as the Alberta government, which recently lost $4 billion from its pension funds, allows the fossils guaranteed profits based on Bank of Canada 30 bond rates of more than 2.5%.

    AER.ca ST98 June 08, 2020 report states Tar Sands mining projects require US$ WTI prices of $80/bbl. SAGD projects require US$ WTI prices of $45/bbl. WTI would never rise above $30/bbl if Russia, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Iran and Iraq were allowed to sell in a 'free market'.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News