• 4 minutes End of Sanction Waivers
  • 8 minutes Balancing Act---Sanctions, Venezuela, Trade War and Demand
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 14 minutes What Would Happen If the World Ran Out of Crude Oil?
  • 2 hours ..
  • 17 mins New German Study Shocks Electric Cars: “Considerably” Worse For Climate Than Diesel Cars, Up To 25% More CO2
  • 2 hours Summit: Kim, Putin To Meet Thursday in Russia’s Far East
  • 10 hours Don't Climb Onto the $80+ Oil Price Greed Roller Coaster, Please.
  • 13 hours Deep Analysis: How China Is Replacing America As Asia’s Military Titan
  • 2 hours Iran Sabre Rattles Over the Straights of Hormuz
  • 19 hours Populist Surge Coming in Europe's May Election
  • 13 mins China To Promote Using Wind Energy To Power Heating
  • 1 hour Nothing Better than Li-Ion on the Horizon
  • 1 day Saudi Arabia Says To Coordinate With Other Producers To Ensure Adequate Oil Supply
  • 23 hours Liberal Heads Explode as U.S. Senate Confirms Oil Lobbyist David Bernhardt as Interior Secretary
  • 4 hours How many drilling sites are left in the Permian?
Alt Text

Why Russia Fails To Speed Up Production Cuts

Russia pledged to speed up…

Alt Text

Libya’s Fragile Oil Renaissance Is Under Threat

Libya’s oil recovery under General…

Alt Text

Why The Argentinian Shale Boom Isn’t Taking Off

Despite some sizeable investment from…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Schlumberger’s Gamble Could Change Oilfield Services Forever

The world’s largest oilfield services firm has decided that it should take an ownership stake in upstream oil and gas production, rather than simply provide the services for doing so. The new strategy is being closely watched as a potential model for the major oilfield services companies that have drilling prowess but struggle with lackluster activity in a world of $50 oil.

Schlumberger has decided to put billions of dollars on the line to become an oil producer, not just a drilling servicer. Typically, Schlumberger and its peers provide equipment, or seismic testing, or well casing and fracking services, or the analysis of oilfield data, etc., while their clients—oil producers—have ownership over the oil and ultimately sell it into the market.

By buying ownership into oilfields, Schlumberger can have “a say in drilling decisions, oilfield management and even on hiring other Schlumberger units for service contracts, the company has told investors,” Reuters reports. And as Reuters explains, by controlling a drilling project, Schlumberger can carry out the entire project rather than merely being a bidder on the variety of narrow jobs that go into oil production, an approach that often means it only wins some contracts on a given project while losing out on other bids to competitors.

The new ownership model for Schlumberger is not without downsides. Under its conventional servicer model, Schlumberger gets paid to complete a well, for example—money that would come in whether or not the broader project ended up turning a profit. In that sense, it was much safer and more predictable. But as the owner and operator, Schlumberger could expose itself to a lot of risk if a project doesn’t turn out well. The flip side is that it can make a lot more money if everything goes according to plan. Related: The $10 Trillion Resource North Korea Can't Tap

Although it’s still early, there’s some evidence that the approach is bearing fruit. The return on capital employed for Schlumberger Production Management (SPM), the name of Schlumberger’s oil production unit, was seven percent higher between 2011 and 2016 than the rest of the company’s units, according to Market Realist.

But its recent $700 million investment in a joint venture on oil exploration in Nigeria illustrates the risks involved. Reuters says its partnership with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. would need oil prices to trade between $50 and $60 per barrel to earn a 20 percent profit. Brent crude trades at the lower end of that range and some analysts do not see it moving closer to $60 in the near future.

Also, Schlumberger wrote down hundreds of millions of dollars in an Eagle Ford project that went sour when oil prices crashed in 2014.

Another issue: Some now see Schlumberger somewhat competing with its own clients, since it will also be an oil producer. It may seem a bit awkward since Schlumberger depends on those other oil producers for the bulk of its business. Schlumberger has downplayed the prospect that it is competing against its clients.

There are a few significant ramifications from Schlumberger’s new approach. First, it turns Schlumberger into a sizable oil producer in its own right. Reuters says that Schlumberger had 230,000 bpd of oil and gas production under its control at the end of last year, which puts it on par with some of the largest shale producers in Texas.

More importantly, it could lead to a change in strategy for the entire oilfield services industry. By taking stakes in oil projects, Schlumberger ends up boxing out its competitors by “winning” all of the contracts for oilfield services on that project. Reuters cites a project in Morocco with a small UK-based natural gas producer. Sound Energy PLC gave all the services contracts to Schlumberger if the latter bought a 27 percent stake in the project. By putting up the money, Schlumberger earned the rights to 27 percent of the earnings of the project, while also carrying out all the services as well. Sound Energy brought on a partner with world-class drilling capabilities while also reducing its financial risk. Related: Is Russia Pushing Saudi Arabia Out Of Asia?

But importantly, the deal prevented Schlumberger’s traditional rivals in the oilfield services industry from having the ability to bid on any of the service contracts.

Analysts are closely watching to see if Schlumberger’s nearest competitors, like Baker Hughes or Halliburton, follow suit. That will likely depend on how lucrative it turns out to be for Schlumberger. Up until now, it seems to be a mixed bag for the oilfield services giant.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • drsaad786 on September 13 2017 said:
    And this is being done in the world where oil demand is going down due the boom of electric vehicle push. Either Schlumberger is foolish, or the people betting on electric vehicles too much in short term don't know the whole picture. IMO Schlumberger is genius. Getting in cheap.
  • TheJack on September 14 2017 said:
    Anyone betting on the EV market, long or short, does not know the whole story. Or they wouldn't be betting on it in the first place.
  • Timmie Tee on September 14 2017 said:
    The EV market is paralleling the solar industry's path of overhyped promise which led to overinvestment and then bankruptcies and consolidation. We'll see a fallout soon in EV OEM's, one of the first was Fischer, which was bought by Karma, and makes a $130K POS. Major players like Tesla will follow as soon as subsidies dry up.
  • Bubafatz on September 14 2017 said:
    I wonder if they are getting ready for the Weald Basin result(They will see it 1st) and it may be open to a farm in. All hail the "Gatwick Gusher"
  • R2D2 on September 14 2017 said:
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. I think that SLB will give up after couple of dry wells...
  • Nick Santarelli on September 16 2017 said:
    Its gonna be interesting to see if Schlumberger can afford its own service s....just sayin.
  • Boris on September 19 2017 said:
    Excitement over EVs is a scam. Unless the electricity to power those EVs is produced from 100% renewable sources, replacing combustion engines with electric motors is going to increase fossil fuels consumption because of double energy conversion (fossil fuel energy to electricity then electricity to mechanical energy).
  • John Conner on September 21 2017 said:
    Being so big, thinking they can now be producers just makes me think....if I was a producer, paid millions for services to Schlumberger, do you think I would have them as a service company any longer now they are a competitor that has a lower overhead on services? The producers will get other service companies, Schlumberger will drill a few dry holes, lay off more employees to make sure management bonuses are paid, have noone in the field (almost like now) then say it was someone elses fault, take more massive bonuses as management leaves quickly as it all falls.
  • RSV2007 on October 17 2017 said:
    Halliburton attempted this several years back with the expected disastrous results. Competing with the oil companies cost them business.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News