• 4 minutes USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 10 minutes IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 16 minutes GOODBYE FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCE!!
  • 10 hours The Great Climate Change Swindle
  • 41 mins Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 3 hours End of EV Subsidies?
  • 42 mins Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
  • 3 hours Maersk's COO statment.
  • 1 day S. Australia showing the way
  • 12 hours China Builds LNG Icebreaker
  • 15 hours Exxon buys green power.
  • 21 hours More OPEC Members May Leave
  • 5 hours EPA To Roll Back Carbon Rule On New Coal Plants
  • 52 mins Trump accuses Google Of Hiding 'Fair Media' Coverage of him
  • 2 days Not only GM: Morgan Stanley Predicts Ford to Cut 25,000 Jobs in Overhaul
  • 1 day Feudalism: The Most Resilient System?
Alt Text

How President Trump Is Undermining U.S. Oil Producers

President Donald Trump seems determined…

Alt Text

OPEC+ Gears Up For Production Cuts

Oil prices rose once again…

Alt Text

Is This The Most Crucial Factor For Oil In 2019?

Weakness in global equities and…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Oil Majors Only Replace 75% of Oil and Gas Produced in 2015

The oil majors failed to replace all of the oil and gas reserves that they burned through in 2015, a worrying sign for the industry’s future.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the seven largest oil and gas companies only replaced about 75 percent of the reserves on average that they produced last year, the worst replacement rate in over a decade.

Perhaps the most eye-raising fact was that ExxonMobil, the world’s largest publically-traded oil company, was unable to replace 100 percent of the oil and gas it pulled from the ground. The oil supermajor replaced just 67 percent of the oil produced in 2015. Related: Oil Prices Beyond WTI And Brent

Because the valuations of oil companies depend very heavily on their booked oil and gas reserves, the 2015 performance presents some troubling questions about the long-term return for shareholders. If drillers work through their reserve base and fail to replace the oil and gas produced, eventually production will have to decline. That means so will the company’s share price.

To be sure, the industry retrenched and slashed exploration spending in 2015 as oil prices crashed. A less aggressive exploration campaign yielded lower results. Related: Was Russia’s Syrian Campaign Aimed At Turkish Energy Security?

Moreover, low oil prices also struck a blow to the underlying reserve base that the oil industry is sitting on. High-cost reserves that are uneconomical to produce at today’s prices can be technically removed from their list of assets, as required by financial regulatory rules. As such, reserves could climb again when and if oil prices rise, so the headline-grabbing figure that the oil majors only replaced 75 percent of their produced reserves last year is less worrying than it might seem.

Still, some companies are starting to make more fundamental shifts in their corporate strategies, less focused on growth at all costs and more focused on profitability. Instead of spending huge sums on increasingly risky projects, companies are putting their dollars into the more secure prospect of boosting production from existing fields.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Paul Robinson on March 30 2016 said:
    All speculation on oil must be banned.
  • DDearborn on March 31 2016 said:
    Hmmm

    This is standard operating procedure; prices are down supplies were off the charts. Therefore the oil companies simply shut down production. Very soon you will here the pundits pining that oil prices must go up because of scarcity of supply. It is a rather transparent fraud.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
-->