• 3 minutes Biden Seeks $2 Trillion Clean Energy And Infrastructure Spending Boost
  • 6 minutes Pompeo upsets China; oil & gas prices to fall
  • 11 minutes The Secret China Iran Oil Deal At The Heart Of One Belt One Road Project
  • 4 hours Trump Hands Putin Major Geopolitical Victory
  • 10 hours Trump Suggests Delaying Election Amid Fraud Claims
  • 10 hours Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 6 hours While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 5 hours End Game For Oil? OPEC Prepares For An Age Of Dwindling Demand
  • 3 days The World is Facing a Solar Panel Waste Problem
  • 1 day "The Great Reset" What does this mean for you.
  • 1 day Mask Disposal
  • 1 day You may all go to hell
  • 1 day Biden admits he has been tested for Cognitive Decline several times. Didn't show any proof of test results.
  • 12 hours What happens to oil and gas production when 1/2 of Oklahoma is handed over to the Tribes
  • 2 days Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 3 days Trump is turning USA into a 3rd world dictatorship
Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Oil Majors Only Replace 75% of Oil and Gas Produced in 2015

The oil majors failed to replace all of the oil and gas reserves that they burned through in 2015, a worrying sign for the industry’s future.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the seven largest oil and gas companies only replaced about 75 percent of the reserves on average that they produced last year, the worst replacement rate in over a decade.

Perhaps the most eye-raising fact was that ExxonMobil, the world’s largest publically-traded oil company, was unable to replace 100 percent of the oil and gas it pulled from the ground. The oil supermajor replaced just 67 percent of the oil produced in 2015. Related: Oil Prices Beyond WTI And Brent

Because the valuations of oil companies depend very heavily on their booked oil and gas reserves, the 2015 performance presents some troubling questions about the long-term return for shareholders. If drillers work through their reserve base and fail to replace the oil and gas produced, eventually production will have to decline. That means so will the company’s share price.

To be sure, the industry retrenched and slashed exploration spending in 2015 as oil prices crashed. A less aggressive exploration campaign yielded lower results. Related: Was Russia’s Syrian Campaign Aimed At Turkish Energy Security?

Moreover, low oil prices also struck a blow to the underlying reserve base that the oil industry is sitting on. High-cost reserves that are uneconomical to produce at today’s prices can be technically removed from their list of assets, as required by financial regulatory rules. As such, reserves could climb again when and if oil prices rise, so the headline-grabbing figure that the oil majors only replaced 75 percent of their produced reserves last year is less worrying than it might seem.

Still, some companies are starting to make more fundamental shifts in their corporate strategies, less focused on growth at all costs and more focused on profitability. Instead of spending huge sums on increasingly risky projects, companies are putting their dollars into the more secure prospect of boosting production from existing fields.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Paul Robinson on March 30 2016 said:
    All speculation on oil must be banned.
  • DDearborn on March 31 2016 said:
    Hmmm

    This is standard operating procedure; prices are down supplies were off the charts. Therefore the oil companies simply shut down production. Very soon you will here the pundits pining that oil prices must go up because of scarcity of supply. It is a rather transparent fraud.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News