• 6 hours Bidding Action Heats Up In UK’s Continental Shelf
  • 11 hours Keystone Pipeline Restart Still Unknown
  • 15 hours UK Offers North Sea Oil Producers Tax Relief To Boost Investment
  • 17 hours Iraq Wants To Build Gas Pipeline To Kuwait In Blow To Shell
  • 19 hours Trader Trafigura Raises Share Of Oil Purchases From State Firms
  • 20 hours German Energy Group Uniper Rejects $9B Finnish Takeover Bid
  • 22 hours Total Could Lose Big If It Pulls Out Of South Pars Deal
  • 23 hours Dakota Watchdog Warns It Could Revoke Keystone XL Approval
  • 2 days Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 2 days Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 2 days Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 2 days Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 2 days Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 2 days Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 2 days Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 2 days U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 2 days Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 3 days Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 3 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 3 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 3 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 3 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 5 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 6 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 6 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 6 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 6 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 6 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 6 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 6 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 6 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 7 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 7 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 7 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 7 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 7 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 7 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 7 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 8 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
Alt Text

OPEC Concedes That U.S. Shale Won’t Die

OPEC has significantly adjusted its…

Alt Text

“End Of Oil” Narratives Are Misleading

While the world makes dramatic…

Ferdinand E. Banks

Ferdinand E. Banks

Ferdinand E. Banks, Uppsala University (Sweden), performed his undergraduate studies at Illinois Institute of Technology (electrical engineering) and Roosevelt University (Chicago), graduating with honors in…

More Info

Libya: But What About The Oil?

Libya: But What About The Oil?

As I pen these few humble words, Swedish combat aircraft are being tuned up for the long flight from Sweden to somewhere in the Mediterranean. There is no  shortage of volunteers – pilots, mechanics and other ground crew – for this mission, because it has been a very long winter in Scandinavia, and many young Swedish men are so keen to get close to the disco and bar life in that sunny part of the world that they can almost  taste it.

As they used to ask in the U.S. during WW2, is this trip necessary? Well, let’s do some math. The price of oil was about eighty-eight dollars a barrel (= $88/b) when the trouble in Libya began, and the price of West Texas Intermediate oil just touched $105/b – which means that the Brent price might be around $115/b. “About, might be, around” is sufficient, because as Bertram Russell once said, “all science is based on approximations”. Taking these prices into consideration, my ‘back-of-the-envelope’ calculations suggest that OPEC – whose exports are at least 25 million barrels of oil a day – has to-date raked in an extra 10 billion dollars or so because of the increased tension in Libya.

But 10 billion dollars might turn out to be no more significant than lunch money for oil importers when all the charges that will have to be faced because of the increase in the price of oil are contemplated. A palpable rise in the price of oil inevitably increases the price of other energy resources, as well as some other items. Furthermore, nobody seems to appreciate the macroeconomic damage that might be done because of the decision by Security Counsel blockheads to ‘diss’ Colonel Gaddafi,  instead of giving him the respect that he obviously feels he deserves. Had I been doing the planning, I would have arranged  for him to visit Paris and/or Washington in order to wine and dine and exchange opinions and wheel and deal with the kind of busybodies and careerists who completely lack the ability to estimate the possible economic consequences  of the stupid venture they ended up sponsoring or approving.

The venture in question – or fling which it deserves to be called – is about oil, and not about providing for the safety of Libyans. The way to provide for the safety of Libyans was to find some way to talk to the Colonel in a quiet room,  and explain to him (and his colleagues) the seriousness and unacceptability of uncivilized and unbusinesslike behavior. If necessary some money could change hands.  As the CEO of the Italian corporation ENI pointed out, threatening sanctions and military action might result in the ‘peace officers’ – to use one of those lovely expressions coined in the old American West for lawmen – shooting themselves in the foot.  A decline in world oil production of perhaps 1.5 percent, due to a clumsy handling of the Libyan troubles, almost immediately led to an increase in the oil price of 17 percent. That is not good, and somebody influential needs to look at the work of Professor James Hamilton (of the University of California, San Diego) to see what this can mean for the macroeconomy!

Let’s put it this way, the global macroeconomy cannot support the kind of oil price escalation that this fling might bring about.  For reasons I choose not to go into here, but which have to do with the strategy of OPEC, that increase could turn out to be a prelude to further increases. With all due respect, instead of running off at the mouth in talk-shops or gab-fests or teach-ins  that he hosts, and which could have a very unhealthy effect on the price of oil,  Prime Minister Sarkozy should make an effort to avoid commenting on the internal affairs of sovereign states. I know that he doesn’t want to busy himself reading about his private life in French newspapers and magazines, but at least he could examine the dossier Les Guerres du Pétrole (in Géoéconomie, 2006), should he feel compelled again to deal with economic issues that neither he nor his up-market friends and neighbors  have the slightest possibility of understanding.

By. Professor Ferdinand E. Banks; Uppsala University (Sweden)


Lindahl, Björn (2011). Oljebolag på två stolar. Svenska Dagbladet (22 March).
Paillard, Christophe-Alexandre (2006). La puissance américaine et l’instabilité
         energetique mondiale. Géoéconomie (No 38, Ete)

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on March 24 2011 said:
    What worries me most about Libya is that as passions on both (or all) sides heat up, we might see one group of fanatics or another rig oil wells with explosives and set them off. That happened in early 1991, when Saddam's forces blew up Kuwait's oil wells out of pure cussedness and spite when they were forced to withdraw in the face of the overwhelming firepower of American and other armed forces.
  • Anonymous on March 25 2011 said:
    Excellent observation, Alex. Of course what we want is the Colonel to quietly retire, and what I want is for his son Saif to take charge. That gentleman has THE LOOK!What I don't want though is this talk by ignoramuses and morons about protecting civilians. Of course we want civilians protected, even if it means the use of ground forces, BUT THE WAR IS ABOUT OIL. It's about oil and at any time it might lapse into aggrevated stupidity. We might as well get that clear.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News