• 2 days Iraq Begins To Rebuild Largest Refinery
  • 2 days Canadian Producers Struggle To Find Transport Oil Cargo
  • 2 days Venezuela’s PDVSA Makes $539M Interest Payments On Bonds
  • 2 days China's CNPC Considers Taking Over South Pars Gas Field
  • 2 days BP To Invest $200 Million In Solar
  • 2 days Tesla Opens New Showroom In NYC
  • 2 days Petrobras CEO Hints At New Partner In Oil-Rich Campos Basin
  • 3 days Venezuela Sells Oil Refinery Stake To Cuba
  • 3 days Tesla Is “Headed For A Brick Wall”
  • 3 days Norwegian Pension Fund Set to Divest From Oil Sands and Coal Ventures
  • 3 days IEA: “2018 Might Not Be Quite So Happy For OPEC Producers”
  • 3 days Goldman Bullish On Oil Markets
  • 3 days OPEC Member Nigeria To Issue Africa’s First Sovereign Green Bond
  • 3 days Nigeria To Spend $1B Of Oil Money Fighting Boko Haram
  • 3 days Syria Aims To Begin Offshore Gas Exploration In 2019
  • 3 days Australian Watchdog Blocks BP Fuel Station Acquisition
  • 4 days Colombia Boosts Oil & Gas Investment
  • 4 days Environmentalists Rev Up Anti-Keystone XL Angst Amongst Landowners
  • 4 days Venezuelan Default Swap Bonds At 19.25 Cents On The Dollar
  • 4 days Aramco On The Hunt For IPO Global Coordinators
  • 4 days ADNOC Distribution Jumps 16% At Market Debut In UAE
  • 4 days India Feels the Pinch As Oil Prices Rise
  • 4 days Aramco Announces $40 Billion Investment Program
  • 5 days Top Insurer Axa To Exit Oil Sands
  • 5 days API Reports Huge Crude Draw
  • 5 days Venezuela “Can’t Even Write A Check For $21.5M Dollars.”
  • 5 days EIA Lowers 2018 Oil Demand Growth Estimates By 40,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Trump Set To Open Atlantic Coast To Oil, Gas Drilling
  • 5 days Norway’s Oil And Gas Investment To Drop For Fourth Consecutive Year
  • 5 days Saudis Plan To Hike Gasoline Prices By 80% In January
  • 6 days Exxon To Start Reporting On Climate Change Effect
  • 6 days US Geological Survey To Reevaluate Bakken Oil Reserves
  • 6 days Brazil Cuts Local Content Requirements to Attract Oil Investors
  • 6 days Forties Pipeline Could Remain Shuttered For Weeks
  • 6 days Desjardins Ends Energy Loan Moratorium
  • 6 days ADNOC Distribution IPO Valuation Could Be Lesson For Aramco
  • 6 days Russia May Turn To Cryptocurrencies For Oil Trade
  • 6 days Iraq-Iran Oil Swap Deal To Run For 1 Year
  • 9 days Venezuelan Crude Exports To U.S. Fall To 15-year Lows
  • 9 days Mexico Blames Brazil For Failing Auction

Breaking News:

Iraq Begins To Rebuild Largest Refinery

Alt Text

Don’t Count On A Utah Shale Boom

President Trump has announced a…

Alt Text

Gulf Of Mexico Production Recovers After Recent Slump

Hurricane outages dominated the Gulf…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Is The EIA Exaggerating U.S. Oil Production?


Oil is back at $50 per barrel, restoring some semblance of confidence in the market. But that is just about as much as we can expect in terms of a rally, according to most analysts, with momentum likely to dissipate from here.

But not everyone agrees. Many are worried that oil prices will crash again next year as OPEC scrambles for an exit strategy, but there is actually a bullish case for oil that is not outlandish.

First, crude oil inventories continue to fall. The EIA just released another week’s worth of data, showing another drawdown in inventories. It was a bit more modest last week – 1.5 million barrels – compared to previous four weeks, but the drawdowns continue. U.S. crude oil inventories are now down more than 50 million barrels from the peak hit in March, with stocks back within the five-year range.

But a larger reason why oil prices could deviate from expectations and actually rise quite a bit is because the market is poetically assuming a lot more oil is set to come online than might actually be the case. As Andy Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates, notes in a CNBC column, the market has already factored in further production gains from Libya and Nigeria, a major reason why market pessimism really spread in the month of June. But because that assumption is baked into today’s price, if those two countries – beset with violence and instability – fail to come through, then a lot less oil will reach the market than is generally assumed. Related: Iraq Dethrones Saudi Arabia As India’s No.1 Oil Supplier

Moreover, the U.S. could also disappoint. As discussed in previous articles, the shale drilling boom is starting to slow. A bottleneck of services is held back the completion of some wells, while many shale companies have actually started to throttle back on their spending and drilling activity. In the past few weeks, a list of companies have announced cuts to spending plans for this year, including Anadarko Petroleum, ConocoPhillips, Whiting Petroleum, Hess Corp., and Pioneer Natural Resources. Those five companies alone have slashed a combined $850 million in spending.

The cuts, coming in response to the recent dip of oil prices into the mid-$40s, will likely translate into much lower production next year. As a result, the projection from the EIA that shale will hit 10 million barrels per day (mb/d) in 2018, or even the more recent downward revision to just 9.9 mb/d, could be hard to reach.

However, there is one other important uncertainty that could point to higher oil prices in the near-term. Not only will future production come in lower than expected, but what if current production is actually lower than we think? What if we are overestimating the shale boom?

The market bases its expectations for U.S. oil on the EIA weekly production surveys, which have shown a steady climb in output right up through July. The most recent data for the week ending on July 28 pegs current U.S. oil production at 9.43 mb/d.

But the thing is, these weekly estimates are not always accurate, and are often subject to revisions – sometimes large revisions – later on. On the other hand, the EIA publishes more accurate monthly figures, but only on a several month lag. The most recent data is for May, which has U.S. oil production at 9.169 mb/d.

The problem is that there is quite a gap between these two sources, with the more recent but less accurate weekly figures reflecting much higher oil production.

For example, while the EIA is now pretty certain the U.S. averaged 9.169 mb/d in May, that wasn’t what they thought at the time. Back in May, the EIA published these weekly estimates:

• May 5: 9.314 mb/d

• May 12: 9.305 mb/d

• May 19: 9.320 mb/d

• May 26: 9.342 mb/d

To take a rough average, that would put May’s monthly production at 9.32 mb/d. In other words, back in May, the EIA was telling everyone that the U.S. was producing 151,000 bpd more than it actually was. This is not to put the blame on the EIA – estimating production in essentially real-time is difficult – but only to say that we only get an accurate picture of what is going on by looking in the rear-view mirror. Related: Solar And Wind Revolution Happening Much Faster Than Expected

Which brings us back to the present. The EIA is now estimating that the U.S. is producing 9.43 mb/d, a figure that has steadily climbed in the past few months. But that would mean that production accelerated very rapidly since May. In the chart below, notice the jump that would need to take place between the monthly figures through May, and the weekly figures up until now.

This is a long-winded way of saying that U.S. oil production could quite conceivably be much lower than 9.43 mb/d right now. In that context, the slowdown in the rig count and the cuts to spending look even more important. Not only will the U.S. fall short of the projections for the rest of this year and next, but it could miss by quite a lot. If that is the case, then oil prices suddenly do not look like they are necessarily trapped at $50 per barrel.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • jack ma on August 04 2017 said:
    Of course they are. They also report 400 barrels in surplus but it's paper oil going all the way back to the 800,000 bpd each day of missing oil from 2015. They are part of the team defending the dollar against the BRICS dedollarization war. IMHO
  • Disgruntled on August 04 2017 said:
    Thanks, Nick, for shining some light on the EIAs' numbers game. You should look into their global demand estimates vs the "revised" actual number over the last several years. Over and over again, the stories (on oilprice.com, I might add) speak of "waning demand" or "falling demand" when referring to yearly demand increases of only 1.2 - 1.3 million barrels/day. Then the revised number comes out the next year and it turns out to be 1.5 - 1.6 million barrels/day, or more. IMHO, Mr. Ma, it's all about creating (discouraging) sentiment that factors into decisions to set the price of oil in the near term, and consequently, the longer term out in fantasy time. I imagine when there's an actual shortage of oil that the stories will speak of "future gluts".
  • rjs on August 04 2017 said:
    the correct word is “overestimating”; dont assume a nefarious intention…earlier this year they were underestimating the weekly output, and when the corrected monthly numbers came out 2 months later they were higher….they report production on Wednesdays for the previous week, and those aren’t meant to be any more than guidance, there’s a lot of data to be gathered from thousands of wells before they can come up with a number that’s close to accurate..
  • Me on August 04 2017 said:
    Just more fake statistics from the gov'ment...does anyone actually believe them or care what they say? Do you think the unemployment rate is 5% ... or inflation is 3%? If so I have some shale driller stock to sell you...just ignore the balance sheet & income statement---they just IP'd 5 wells at 3kb/d each .... must be a gold mine!!!!
  • EMH on August 04 2017 said:
    The financial markets already take the weekly/monthly issue into account. You are assuming a very trivial trading opportunity.
  • Citizen Oil on August 07 2017 said:
    When have the oil numbers or NG numbers ever been accurate ? They should do a monthly or quarterly report that is 100% accurate so people have an idea what is really going on . The errors are laughable even between the Tuesday /Wednesday API and EIA numbers. The current system just isn't credible.
  • Demand matters on August 07 2017 said:
    Lot of Managed money the is long futures is also short E&P equities. This trade worked well after after Q117 when demand moderated for the first time in the past 3 years combined by additional Libyan Oil hitting the market. Now this trade needs to unwind. After Libyan production and depleted global inventories, there are no more sources of cheap oil left. Oil is coming out of the cheapest storage in US.

    Market will need the US oil production going forward. First time in almost 5 years the E&Ps are a good buy.

    Demand is higher (Q1Was weak due to high prices) and production is lower. Nothing else can explain increased refinery and vanishing inventories. Analysts and media is explain or make sense of price action - not to say what's happening does not make sense, that's the traders job. Lower prices and higher demand are actually setting up crude for a spike earlier than expected.

    Demand is on fire. It'll be reflected in prices in the coming months when the Asian demand picks up. But many futures longs would want to cover their E&P shorts before being aggressive on futures buying. I suspect the global inventories will force the issue earlier.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News