• 4 minutes Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 7 minutes China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024
  • 8 minutes Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 10 minutes US Shale: Technology
  • 13 minutes Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
  • 17 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 41 mins Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 9 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 6 mins Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 2 hours Angela Merkel take notice. Russia cut off Belarus oil supply because they would not do as Russia demanded
  • 6 hours Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 9 hours Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 4 hours Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 8 hours Wind Turbine Blades Not Recyclable
  • 8 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 7 hours Denmark gets 47% of its electricity from wind in 2019
  • 1 day Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
Alt Text

How China Could Restart The U.S. Oil Export Boom

China may resume purchases of…

Alt Text

The “Twin Threats” Facing Big Oil

According to a new report…

Alt Text

Why Russia Should Exit The OPEC+ Deal

Russia isn't nearly benefiting as…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

China’s Oil Majors Are Burning Through Oil Reserves

China’s state-owned oil companies have been beaten down by low oil prices and stagnant demand at home. PetroChina and Cnooc reported dismal earnings this week, and offered little reason for hope moving forward.

PetroChina said its profit fell by 98 percent in the first half of 2016 compared to the same period a year earlier. The company’s crude oil output fell by 4.2 percent as aging fields continue to deplete. Cnooc put up even worse numbers, reporting a 7.7 billion yuan loss, a remarkable downfall from the 14.7 billion yuan profit in the first half of 2015. Cnooc has been dragged down by its $15 billion purchase of Nexen a few years ago, a Canadian oil sands producer that has bedeviled its Chinese parent company for quite some time.

Nexen has suffered oil spills, explosions, and other safety issues. Cnooc took a US$1.6 billion impairment charge on overseas assets, largely because of the troubled oil sands producer. Cnooc made the unfortunate decision of paying top dollar for the company at the height of the market in 2013.

The Chinese oil companies offered up some small achievements, however. Cnooc said that it has achieved cost reductions on the order of 15 percent. It also took the ax to capital expenditures, reducing spending by 33 percent. But it still intends to produce as much as possible, which as The Wall Street Journal reports, presents a longer-term problem for the state-owned company. Cnooc is extracting its oil reserves at a worrying pace. The WSJ says that its reserves in China – some of its most lucrative – can only last for three years at current production rates. Cnooc also has an overall reserve life of only 8.4 years, one of the lowest relative to its international peers.

That suggests that Cnooc will probably have to cut production at some point, perhaps sooner rather than later. Or it will have to dramatically step up spending to develop other oilfields in order to replenish its reserves, which would be an about-face from its current cost-cutting efforts. It will probably be politically difficult to cut production, so the latter option is more likely – Cnooc may be forced to step up spending or make other acquisitions to prevent production declines.

In short, falling revenues and a weak portfolio of assets could force some tough decisions in Beijing.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Rrads From Oilprice.com:

 




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • Hank Reardon on August 25 2016 said:
    Any possibility of purchasing heavily indebted US E&P companies? Perhaps California fields would be appealing?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play