• 5 minutes Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 8 minutes IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 14 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 17 minutes Could Tesla Buy GM?
  • 5 hours OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 2 hours Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 7 hours Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
  • 41 mins What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 7 hours And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 11 hours Alberta Cuts Push Prices Too High
  • 1 day Congrats: 4 journalists and a newspaper are Time’s Person of the Year
  • 32 mins U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 2 hours Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 56 mins How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 3 hours USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 8 hours Rigs Down
Alt Text

Is This The Most Crucial Factor For Oil In 2019?

Weakness in global equities and…

Alt Text

The Dangers Of China’s Growing Oil Demand

China’s November oil imports hit…

Alt Text

The Biggest Winners Of The Oil Price Slump

Oil prices fell below $60…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Trending Discussions

Alaska Mulls Oil Industry Tax Break to Boost Production

Everyone likes a good tax break, and Alaska’s governor is courting the oil and gas, timber and mining industries with a legislative proposal designed to make the state as attractive as North Dakota.

On 29 January, Alaska Governor Sean Parnell proposed tax cuts at a legislative hearing.

So would tax breaks be enough to turn Alaska into North Dakota—to ensure an Alaskan Bakken?

Alaska’s economy is in trouble and oil and gas production are declining and explorers and developers complaining of too much red tape and prohibitive taxes.  

According to the Senator in a commentary published in Alaskan media, “The volume of oil transported through the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) has steadily declined over the past few decades. Whereas 2,100,000 barrels per day were being transported in 1988, fiscal year 2012 saw a mere 579,100 bpd. That's a 71-percent decrease. Moreover, that volume is expected to further reduce to 552,800 and 538,400 in fiscal years 2013 and 2014, respectively. If current policies remain in place, the Department of Revenue expects the decline in oil production to continue at a rate of 5.5 percent per year through the next decade.”

Related article: Big Taxes, Big Oil

At the same time, Alaska's revenue commissioner has said there he has seen no evidence that existing tax credits to oil companies have led to increased production. However, he told the Associated Press that while he hasn’t seen such evidence that does not mean it doesn’t exist. Still, a direct connection has not been made.

Alaska used to be the darling of American oil production, but now even North Dakota has surpassed it. One problem is that companies have not been very interested in exploring for conventional crude oil reserves, with the focus more on unconventional shale. And while tax credits have helped somewhat to attract more exploration, it has only gone so far and legislators have yet to come up with a plan that would really focus on boosting oil production.

And this is where the proposed change to the tax rate comes in. If we can judge by the response of the industry to these proposals—they are making a very public show of support for the Senator’s efforts—then a tax rate that is more competitive could be the engine that helps ramp up production.

Related article: Alaska: Gas Rich, but No Longer Relevant

Alaska has fallen on hard times overall, especially since the natural gas boom has rendered its bountiful reserves less relevant. The state is hoping to cash in on US gas exports. It needs a new market for its gas—for which it is first and foremost eyeing Japan—but for now this issue remains controversial.

For now, export licenses are considered separately by the Department of Energy, which determines on a case-by-case basis whether it is in the country’s interest. The oil industry is out in full force lobbying for unlimited gas exports, while other industries, like chemical manufacturers, want to keep gas supplies at home to boost manufacturing.  

Natural gas exports, though, would require massive investment in infrastructure, and this ties back to Alaska’s investment climate: the state’s tax environment isn’t attractive enough to lure the necessary infrastructure investment.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News