• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 2 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 7 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 53 mins The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 11 hours OPEC's No. 2 Producer Wants to Know How Buyers Use Its Oil
  • 5 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 13 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 46 mins U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 7 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 6 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 4 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 14 hours U.S. - Saudi Arabia: President Trump Says Saudi Arabia's King Wouldn't Survive "Two Weeks" Without U.S. Backing
  • 14 hours Superhumans
  • 10 hours Who's Ready For The Next Contest?
Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

4.7 Billion Barrels Just Evaporated In This World Class Oil Play

Canadian oil sands

It’s reserves reporting season in the oil and gas business. And one of the world’s biggest plays saw some major casualties this week as new numbers hit the street.

The Canadian oil sands.

ConocoPhillips kicked off the carnage on Tuesday. Reporting that it has cut reserves by 1.2 billion barrels at four oil sands projects — Surmont, Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Narrow Lakes. With overall reserves from these plays dropping from 2.4 billion barrels to just 1.2 billion barrels as of the end of 2016.

And the situation was even more severe for fellow oil sands producer ExxonMobil. Which announced yesterday it has written down 3.5 billion barrels of reserves from its Kearl project — representing a full 100% of the reserves previously booked here.

The driving force for the revision was lower oil prices. With both Conoco and Exxon being subject to strict reporting rules on pricing and reserves prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Under SEC price assumptions, oil sands production no longer registers as economic. Meaning that reserves have to be scrubbed from the books — amounting to some massive deletions for mega-projects in this play.

The situation isn’t as dire as it might seem — with at least some oil sands barrels likely economic at today’s +$50/bbl price. In fact, Conoco executives told investors on a conference call that they expect to rebook the lost reserves if prices stay around current levels. Related: Oil To $70? Or Down To $30?

That point is also driven home by the divergence in performance between U.S. and Canadian oil sands firms. Cenovus Energy, for example, said its proved reserves rose 5 percent in 2016 — with that company subject to less-strict reporting rules from Canadian regulators.

But whatever the reasons, the metrics here look troubling — with Exxon’s reserves replacement ratio for 2016 plunging to just 65 percent. Such figures could drag down investor confidence and perhaps affect banking covenants. Watch for any knock-on effects over the next few months.

Here’s to pulling it out of thin air.

By Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Lee James on February 24 2017 said:
    Of course official reserves will go up when crude prices go up. Main thing to watch is over-exuberance with technology's ability to increase production. It comes at a cost. Today, we pay for expensive lateral drilling, hydraulic fracturing, and two basic ways of pulling oil-tar out of sand. And there's deep sea and Arctic. We can love the bbl produced, but we have to love the cost of production per bbl as well.

    On top of today's production cost, we have the cost of tomorrow. In the end, someone will pay for compromised water, air and -- much beyond our imagination to go there -- affected climate.

    Is our nation thinking about an energy plan that sees beyond short term profit? And are expected short term profits even there? We need a new plan. One that works for our grand kids too.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News