• 3 minutes 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
  • 6 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 11 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 14 minutes Democrats through impeachment process helped Trump go out of China deal conundrum. Now Trump can safely postpone deal till after November 2020 elections
  • 48 mins Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 5 hours Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 6 hours USA v China. Which is 'best'?
  • 18 hours Wallstreet's "acid test" for Democrat Presidential candidate to receive their financial support . . . Support "Carried Interest"
  • 5 hours Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 14 hours My interview on PDVSA Petrocaribe and corruption
  • 4 hours Quotes from the Widowmaker
  • 1 day Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 3 hours Judiciary impeachment: Congressman says Sean Misko, Abigail Grace and unnamed 3rd (Ciaramella) need to testify.
  • 4 hours Tesla Launches Faster Third Generation Supercharger
  • 1 day Petroleum Industry Domain Names
Alt Text

India’s Coal Paradox

India is making a huge…

Alt Text

Coal’s Long Goodbye

U.S. coal producers continue to…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Report Says Clean Coal Tech Not Present-Day Reality

A new report compiled in consultation with the White House and a pool of clean-energy experts suggests that clean-coal technology is too embryonic to use as a base for America’s new climate change rules for power plants.

The report, released Tuesday, follows the release earlier this month of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)  proposed new carbon emissions standards for power plants, which would make it impossible for new coal-fired plants to be built without the implementation of carbon capture and sequestration technology, otherwise known as “clean-coal” tech, which is still in its early days.  

Related article: DOE Funds Carbon Capture Project Amid Fight Over Future of Coal

If finalized, the new standards will boost the future of natural gas-fueled power plants, which can achieve the new emissions standards more readily, and the new report warns the Obama administration that carbon-capture technology is “only just gaining maturity for power generation.”

"We are not saying CCS [carbon capture and sequestration] isn't commercially viable, but it is unproven enough to not bank [greenhouse-gas] targets alone on this target,” noted former Colorado governor Bill Ritter (Democrat), who led the report.

Where are we with CCS exactly? It’s moving forward, albeit slowly. North America’s first two power generating plants to have employed CCS successfully (in Mississippi and Canada) haven’t come on line yet, but are expected to do so this year, according to Ritter.

So while there may be an argument that CCS is commercially viable, that hasn’t been proven, the report argues, and thus should not serve as a foundation for a new climate change policy.  

Related article: Reports of Coal’s Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

This latest report also succeeds another study last week that bolstered earlier EPA findings that power plants fueled by natural gas release some 40% less carbon dioxide than coal-fired plants.

According to the new study conducted by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, combined-cycle natural gas power plants, which use a combination of natural gas and recycled exhaust heat, release significantly less greenhouse gases than their coal-fired counterparts.

Last week, the US Department of Energy approved $1 billion in funding for a carbon capture and sequestration project in Meredosia, Illinois. Dubbed FutureGen 2.0, the project intends to demonstrate the efficacy of capturing greenhouse gas pollution from coal-fired power plants and storing it underground.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Bob on January 24 2014 said:
    ...and it's obscenely expensive.
  • Jim on January 26 2014 said:
    "...and it is obscenely expensive." For now it is. But in the future....

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play