• 3 minutes Cyberattack Forces Shutdown Of Largest Gasoline Pipeline In United States - Zero Hedge
  • 7 minutes The Painful Death of Coal
  • 11 minutes Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 2 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 8 hours Electric vehicle market growth is a blessing for some metals — and not a big worry for oil
  • 51 mins Is the Republican Party going to perpetuate lies about the 2020 election and attempt to whitewash what happened on January 6th?
  • 8 hours 1 in 5 electric vehicle owners in California switched back to gas because charging their cars is a hassle, new research shows
  • 13 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 mins Renewable Energy Growth Rate Jumped 45% Worldwide In 2020; IEA Sees 'New Normal'
  • 15 hours Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 2 days CRAPPIFORNIA DOES IT AGAIN! California proposes to steer new homes from gas appliances
  • 6 hours Сryptocurrency predictions
  • 2 days How US Capitalism Uses Nationalism
  • 3 days .
Will Asia Actually Fuel A Comeback In Coal?

Will Asia Actually Fuel A Comeback In Coal?

The decline of coal has…

China Approves Mega-Merger Of Two Coal Giants

China Approves Mega-Merger Of Two Coal Giants

China has approved the merger of two…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Report Says Clean Coal Tech Not Present-Day Reality

A new report compiled in consultation with the White House and a pool of clean-energy experts suggests that clean-coal technology is too embryonic to use as a base for America’s new climate change rules for power plants.

The report, released Tuesday, follows the release earlier this month of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)  proposed new carbon emissions standards for power plants, which would make it impossible for new coal-fired plants to be built without the implementation of carbon capture and sequestration technology, otherwise known as “clean-coal” tech, which is still in its early days.  

Related article: DOE Funds Carbon Capture Project Amid Fight Over Future of Coal

If finalized, the new standards will boost the future of natural gas-fueled power plants, which can achieve the new emissions standards more readily, and the new report warns the Obama administration that carbon-capture technology is “only just gaining maturity for power generation.”

"We are not saying CCS [carbon capture and sequestration] isn't commercially viable, but it is unproven enough to not bank [greenhouse-gas] targets alone on this target,” noted former Colorado governor Bill Ritter (Democrat), who led the report.

Where are we with CCS exactly? It’s moving forward, albeit slowly. North America’s first two power generating plants to have employed CCS successfully (in Mississippi and Canada) haven’t come on line yet, but are expected to do so this year, according to Ritter.

So while there may be an argument that CCS is commercially viable, that hasn’t been proven, the report argues, and thus should not serve as a foundation for a new climate change policy.  

Related article: Reports of Coal’s Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

This latest report also succeeds another study last week that bolstered earlier EPA findings that power plants fueled by natural gas release some 40% less carbon dioxide than coal-fired plants.

According to the new study conducted by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, combined-cycle natural gas power plants, which use a combination of natural gas and recycled exhaust heat, release significantly less greenhouse gases than their coal-fired counterparts.

Last week, the US Department of Energy approved $1 billion in funding for a carbon capture and sequestration project in Meredosia, Illinois. Dubbed FutureGen 2.0, the project intends to demonstrate the efficacy of capturing greenhouse gas pollution from coal-fired power plants and storing it underground.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Bob on January 24 2014 said:
    ...and it's obscenely expensive.
  • Jim on January 26 2014 said:
    "...and it is obscenely expensive." For now it is. But in the future....

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News