• 3 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 5 minutes Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 9 minutes This Battery Uses Up CO2 to Create Energy
  • 12 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 30 mins Historian Slams Greta. I Don't See Her in Beijing or Delhi.
  • 2 days We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 2 days US (provocations and tech containment) and Chinese ( restraint and long game) strategies in hegemony conflict
  • 10 hours Let’s take a Historical walk around the Rig
  • 4 hours Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 19 hours Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 20 hours Tesla Will ‘Disappear’ Or ‘Lose 80%’ Of Its Value
  • 20 hours Yesterday POLEXIT started (Poles do not want to leave EU, but Poland made the decisive step towards becoming dictatorship, in breach of accession treaty)
  • 3 days Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 2 days Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 3 days Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 3 days Anti-Macron Protesters Cut Power Lines, Oil Refineries Already Joined Transport Workers as France Anti-Macron Strikes Hit France Hard
Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Report Says Clean Coal Tech Not Present-Day Reality

A new report compiled in consultation with the White House and a pool of clean-energy experts suggests that clean-coal technology is too embryonic to use as a base for America’s new climate change rules for power plants.

The report, released Tuesday, follows the release earlier this month of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)  proposed new carbon emissions standards for power plants, which would make it impossible for new coal-fired plants to be built without the implementation of carbon capture and sequestration technology, otherwise known as “clean-coal” tech, which is still in its early days.  

Related article: DOE Funds Carbon Capture Project Amid Fight Over Future of Coal

If finalized, the new standards will boost the future of natural gas-fueled power plants, which can achieve the new emissions standards more readily, and the new report warns the Obama administration that carbon-capture technology is “only just gaining maturity for power generation.”

"We are not saying CCS [carbon capture and sequestration] isn't commercially viable, but it is unproven enough to not bank [greenhouse-gas] targets alone on this target,” noted former Colorado governor Bill Ritter (Democrat), who led the report.

Where are we with CCS exactly? It’s moving forward, albeit slowly. North America’s first two power generating plants to have employed CCS successfully (in Mississippi and Canada) haven’t come on line yet, but are expected to do so this year, according to Ritter.

So while there may be an argument that CCS is commercially viable, that hasn’t been proven, the report argues, and thus should not serve as a foundation for a new climate change policy.  

Related article: Reports of Coal’s Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

This latest report also succeeds another study last week that bolstered earlier EPA findings that power plants fueled by natural gas release some 40% less carbon dioxide than coal-fired plants.

According to the new study conducted by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, combined-cycle natural gas power plants, which use a combination of natural gas and recycled exhaust heat, release significantly less greenhouse gases than their coal-fired counterparts.

Last week, the US Department of Energy approved $1 billion in funding for a carbon capture and sequestration project in Meredosia, Illinois. Dubbed FutureGen 2.0, the project intends to demonstrate the efficacy of capturing greenhouse gas pollution from coal-fired power plants and storing it underground.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • Bob on January 24 2014 said:
    ...and it's obscenely expensive.
  • Jim on January 26 2014 said:
    "...and it is obscenely expensive." For now it is. But in the future....

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play