• 3 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 8 minutes Why Is America (Texas) Burning Millions of Dollars Per Day Of Natural Gas?
  • 11 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 15 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 13 mins The Pope: "Climate change ... doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain."
  • 23 hours Hormuz and surrounding waters: Energy Threats to the World: Oil, LNG, shipping markets digest new risks after Strait of Hormuz attack
  • 1 day As Iran Nuclear Deal Flounders, France Turns To Saudi For Oil
  • 23 hours The Magic and Wonders of US Shale Supply: Keeping energy price shock minimised: US oil supply keeping lid on prices despite global risks: IEA chief
  • 3 hours Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 9 hours Russia removes special military forces from Venezuela . . . . Maduro gone by September ? . . . Oil starts to flow ? Think so . .
  • 1 day Never Knew Gasoline Prices were this important!
  • 14 hours Plants are Dying
  • 6 hours The Latest: Iranian FM Says US Cannot Expect To ‘Stay Safe’
  • 1 day (Un)expectedly: UK Court Sets Assange U.S. Extradition Hearing For February 2020
  • 20 hours We Are Better Than This
  • 9 hours Emmissions up, renewables nowhere
  • 2 days Britain makes it almost 12 days with NO COAL
Alt Text

Will U.S. Solar Survive The Trade War?

It’s been almost a full…

Alt Text

Tesla Starts Price War In Solar Panel Market

Tesla will cut the prices…

Robert Rapier

Robert Rapier

More Info

Trending Discussions

China’s Surprising Move To Cut Solar Subsidies

Chinese solar companies sold off sharply on Monday following an announcement by the Chinese government that it would take measures that may curb the astronomical growth of its solar industry. The South China Morning Post reported:

“A joint statement put out on Friday by the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance and National Energy Administration said the allocation of quotas for new projects had been halted until further notice, and tariffs on electricity generated from clean energy will be lowered by 0.05 yuan per kilowatt hour, a cut of 6.7 to 9 per cent depending on the region, effective June 1.”

The Chinese government indicated that the curtailment was aimed at “promoting the solar energy sector’s sustainable development, enhancing its development quality and speeding up reduction of subsidies.”

Of course, China isn’t the first country to slash subsidies for renewable energy, but they are in a different position than developed countries like Germany and Spain, where power demand was relatively stable and renewables were helping to replace power derived from fossil fuels and nuclear power.

China’s energy consumption, on the other hand, is growing rapidly. As a result, the country has had an aggressive “all of the above” energy strategy. China has added solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity faster than any other energy source and has done so at a rate faster than any other major country.

A primary motivation for its solar PV investments is China’s need to rein in pollution. But China also knows it faces a future in which oil supplies are depleting while electric vehicles are proliferating. Thus, China sees renewables – and solar PV in particular – as a critical area of focus. Related: Is Russia Bailing On The OPEC Deal?

To put China’s growth in perspective, in 2017 alone China added 53 gigawatts (GW) of new solar PV capacity. That addition was greater than the total solar PV capacity of any country at the beginning of 2017:

Solar PV Capacity and Additions, Top 10 Countries, 2017. Source: REN21 2018 Global Status Report

Given China’s growing need for clean power, China’s decision to curb subsidies caught many — including me — by surprise. Why would China make such a decision?

By Robert Rapier

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Aghast on June 12 2018 said:
    Converting fossil fuels into electricity to be stored in a carbon intensive lithium battery with no economical way to properly dispose of the battery, has a larger adverse environmental impact than burning gasoline in a combustion engine.

    How is that we jumped from horseback to flying to the moon and back and yet now, 50 years later, everything is essentially the same and we never returned to the moon. Is not the moon thought to hold valuable minerals?

    Same goes for medicine and the general quality of life of the human race.

    Life expectancy on the decline, average intelligence declining.
    Why?
    How do we fix this?

    Good luck!

Leave a comment





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News