• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 39 mins A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 6 hours Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 7 hours Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 3 hours Used Thin Film Solar Panels at 15 Cents per Watt
  • 7 hours China has invested btw $30 - $40 Billon in Canadian Oil Sands. Trump should put 10% tariffs on all Chinese oil exported into or thru U.S. in which Chinese companies have invested .
  • 14 hours US Shale Economic Impact: GDP gain realized in shale boom’s first 10 years
  • 2 hours IS ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST WAR REQUIRED TO BOLSTER THE OIL PRICE
  • 14 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 20 hours It's Not the Job of the Government to Dictate Where Businesses Should Go
  • 20 hours Offshore subsea sub 50$/bbl : Rystad Energy: High stakes in store for subsea markets if oil falls to $50/bbl
  • 17 hours Philadelphia Energy Solutions seeks to permanently shut oil refinery - sources
  • 18 hours Tit For Tat: China Strikes Back In Trade Dispute With U.S. With New Tariffs
  • 13 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 12 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
Robert Rapier

Robert Rapier

More Info

Premium Content

China’s Surprising Move To Cut Solar Subsidies

Chinese solar companies sold off sharply on Monday following an announcement by the Chinese government that it would take measures that may curb the astronomical growth of its solar industry. The South China Morning Post reported:

“A joint statement put out on Friday by the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance and National Energy Administration said the allocation of quotas for new projects had been halted until further notice, and tariffs on electricity generated from clean energy will be lowered by 0.05 yuan per kilowatt hour, a cut of 6.7 to 9 per cent depending on the region, effective June 1.”

The Chinese government indicated that the curtailment was aimed at “promoting the solar energy sector’s sustainable development, enhancing its development quality and speeding up reduction of subsidies.”

Of course, China isn’t the first country to slash subsidies for renewable energy, but they are in a different position than developed countries like Germany and Spain, where power demand was relatively stable and renewables were helping to replace power derived from fossil fuels and nuclear power.

China’s energy consumption, on the other hand, is growing rapidly. As a result, the country has had an aggressive “all of the above” energy strategy. China has added solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity faster than any other energy source and has done so at a rate faster than any other major country.

A primary motivation for its solar PV investments is China’s need to rein in pollution. But China also knows it faces a future in which oil supplies are depleting while electric vehicles are proliferating. Thus, China sees renewables – and solar PV in particular – as a critical area of focus. Related: Is Russia Bailing On The OPEC Deal?

To put China’s growth in perspective, in 2017 alone China added 53 gigawatts (GW) of new solar PV capacity. That addition was greater than the total solar PV capacity of any country at the beginning of 2017:

Solar PV Capacity and Additions, Top 10 Countries, 2017. Source: REN21 2018 Global Status Report

Given China’s growing need for clean power, China’s decision to curb subsidies caught many — including me — by surprise. Why would China make such a decision?

By Robert Rapier

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Aghast on June 12 2018 said:
    Converting fossil fuels into electricity to be stored in a carbon intensive lithium battery with no economical way to properly dispose of the battery, has a larger adverse environmental impact than burning gasoline in a combustion engine.

    How is that we jumped from horseback to flying to the moon and back and yet now, 50 years later, everything is essentially the same and we never returned to the moon. Is not the moon thought to hold valuable minerals?

    Same goes for medicine and the general quality of life of the human race.

    Life expectancy on the decline, average intelligence declining.
    Why?
    How do we fix this?

    Good luck!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play