• 4 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 4 hours Adsorbent natural gas tanks are revolutionary.
  • 4 hours Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 3 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 1 hour Visualizing How Much Oil Is In An Electric Vehicle (Hint: a heckuva lot)
  • 20 mins Theresa May to Step Down
  • 7 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 42 mins Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 19 hours Look at the LONGER TERM bigger picture of international oil & gas. Ignore temporary hiccups.
  • 1 day Will Canada drop Liberals, vote in Conservatives?
  • 12 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 1 day Canada's Uncivil Oil War : 78% of Voters Cite *Energy* as the Top Issue
  • 1 day Trump needs to educate US companies and citizens on Chinese Communist Party and People's Liberation Army. This is real ECONOMIC WARFARE. To understand Chinese warfare read General Sun Tzu's "Art of War" . . . written 500 B.C.
  • 16 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 1 day IRAN makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . U.S. makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . IRAQ steps up and plays the mediator. THIS ALLOWS BOTH SIDES TO "SAVE FACE". Then serious negotiations start.
Alt Text

Canada Aims To Solve U.S. Nuclear Woes

Canada is bidding to replace…

Alt Text

The Mysterious Company Behind Kyrgyzstan's Hydro Disaster

Kyrgyzstan’s hydropower drama has reached…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Trending Discussions

India, China, Among Others Eye Himalaya’s Hydroelectric Potential

For many, the Himalayas, site of the world’s highest peak, Mt. Everest, and shrouded by Buddhist cultures such as Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan, is a romantic region shrouded in mystery, as exemplified in the 1937 movie, “Lost Horizon.”

Now reality is about to impinge upon the “roof of the world,” as surrounding nations prepare plans to harness the hydroelectric potential of the mighty rivers, including the Mekong, the Brahmaputra Yangtse and Yellow rivers. It is the headwater of rivers on which nearly half the world depends descending from the Tibetan plateau.

Now, southern Himalayan watershed nations India, Nepal, Bhutan and Pakistan are all developing massive hydroelectric schemes to build overall more than 400 hydroelectric dams which, if built, could collectively provide more than 160,000 megawatts of electricity to their developing economies.

To the north?

China is developing plans for roughly 100 dams to generate a similar amount of power from Tibet’s major rivers.

And to the east, 60 or more dams are being planned for the Mekong River, which also rises in Tibet and flows south through Southeast Asia on its way to the South China Sea.

Related article: Supply Policies Prevent Hydropower from Fulfilling its Potential

According to Ed Grumbine, visiting international scientist with the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Kunming and author of a paper on the topic in “Science” magazine, over the next two decades "the Himalayas could become the most dammed region in the world. India aims to construct 292 dams... doubling current hydropower capacity and contributing 6 per cent to projected national energy needs. If all dams are constructed as proposed, in 28 of 32 major river valleys, the Indian Himalayas would have one of the highest average dam densities in the world, with one dam for every 32km of river channel. Every neighbor of India with undeveloped hydropower sites is building or planning to build multiple dams, totaling at minimum 129 projects."

Should these ambitious projects be realized, then China, which is building multiple dams on all Tibet’s major rivers, could emerge as the ultimate controller of water for nearly 40 per cent of the world's population.

So, will the various nations rimming the Himalayas cooperate in utilizing the water?

India, with whom China fought a brief war in 1962 in the Himalayas over a disputed frontier, have already disputed the headwaters of the Brahmaputra River and China’s hydroelectric plans along the Brahmaputra’s source, the Arun River, before it descends into India. Both the Brahmaputra and Indus rivers have their origins in a lake in western Tibet near Mount Kailash.
Further east, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Laos are alarmed by China’s intentions to build three massive dams on the upper reaches of the Mekong River, adding to six existing hydroelectric facilities.

Related article: Brazil’s Belo Monte Dam, Bad Idea?

Indian strategic affairs expert Brahma Chellaney observed, "China has always been unapologetic about its refusal to enter into water sharing agreements with any states. It has always maintained that it would take into account interests of the lower riparian states but about half of the world's total number of large dams are in China. India, with so many of its major rivers originating in Tibet, is going to be among the worst affected. The issue is usually soft pedaled by the water resources ministry, and there is never any international pressure on this though the list of countries suffering because of China's refusal is quite long including Russia, Kazakhstan, Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos."

Just to spice things up, Pakistan is also concerned about India’s ongoing construction of two hydroelectric dams on the upper reaches of the Indus River. Islamabad is concerned that the 45 megawatt, 190-foot tall Nimoo-Bazgo concrete dam 44 megawatt Chutak hydroelectric power project will reduce the Indus River’s flow towards Pakistan, as they are capable of storing up to 4.23 billion cubic feet of water, violating the terms of the bilateral 1960 Indus Water Treaty.

How concerned?

Four months ago Lahore’s “The Nation” newspaper published an editorial entitled, “War with India inevitable: Nizami.”

Lost horizons, indeed.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • Philip Branton on August 15 2013 said:
    Too bad Brad Pitt did not make this an issue in the Tibet movie he starred in to educate the viewers of what is really at stake...!
  • LOB on August 17 2013 said:
    Good article.

    This is the reason why Americans love to make noises about Tibet being an independent country, it is to annoy the Chinese. Tibet has been part of China for around 700 years. Much longer than Hawaii has been part of the US.

    No one could care a rats arse about Tibet. Good to see the Chinese and Indians building clean hydroelectric plants instead of coal plants or nuclear energy plants.
  • Sumit on June 07 2015 said:
    Tibet has never been a part of China. It is a distinct culture and ethnic group. Chinahas forcefully occupied Tibet because of its water and natural resources and as a high vantage point for placement of its nuclear weapons. It has suppressed the local buddhist culture and forced their leader Dalai Lama to seek exile in India.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News