• 10 mins EIA Weekly Inventory Data Due Wednesday, Despite Govt. Shutdown
  • 4 hours Oklahoma Rig Explodes, Leaving Five Missing
  • 6 hours Lloyd’s Sees No Room For Coal In New Investment Strategy
  • 9 hours Gunmen Kidnap Nigerian Oil Workers In Oil-Rich Delta Area
  • 11 hours Libya’s NOC Restarts Oil Fields
  • 12 hours US Orion To Develop Gas Field In Iraq
  • 3 days U.S. On Track To Unseat Saudi Arabia As No.2 Oil Producer In the World
  • 3 days Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 3 days Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 3 days Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 3 days Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 3 days TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 4 days Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 4 days Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 4 days Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 4 days Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 4 days Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 4 days OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 4 days Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 5 days Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 5 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 5 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 5 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 5 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 5 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 5 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 5 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 5 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 6 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 6 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 6 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 6 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 6 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 6 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 6 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 7 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 7 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 7 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 7 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 7 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

UK Looking at Subsea Cable to Tap Icelandic Geothermal Power

UK Looking at Subsea Cable to Tap Icelandic Geothermal Power

Among all the countries of the world, Iceland has arguably the most interesting power generation system. While the country lacks the beaches, geographic location, and population that would make it a significant economic power in say, tourism or international trade, it does have a very unique feature; its volcanos.

The island is largely powered by geothermal heat emanating from under the surface of the volcanic landscape. That has always made Iceland unusually warm (for its location anyway) despite its intimidating moniker. Now, Great Britain is looking to capitalize on that natural advantage of Iceland through a possible undersea power cable that would help Iceland export clean green geothermal power to tens of millions of British consumers. Related: Why Has Carbon Capture And Storage Not Taken Off Yet?

If it ends up coming to fruition, the UK/Iceland power project would be a monumental accomplishment, creating the world’s longest undersea power cable. With groundbreaking projects like that, it is always difficult to assess cost. Nonetheless, it’s worth estimating the price tag here to determine if the project is worthwhile. Undersea cable in other parts of the UK reportedly costs around $400 a foot. With the distance between the UK and Iceland coming in at around 750 miles or around 4 million feet, that means a simple estimate for the cost of the cable is around $1.6 billion. Alternatively, extrapolating the cost of the Iceland/UK project based on the BritNed cost of roughly $900 million for a 160M million connection, suggests a price tag of around $4.5 billion.

That’s fairly pricey of course, especially when compared to other major international cable projects like subsea internet cable. Yet it’s possible that, like subsea internet cable, the Iceland/UK project might be more efficient due to economies of scale versus smaller projects like the offshore Scottish windfarms. Those kind of efficiencies are really impossible to determine at this point though, as they depend a lot on the details of the project itself. For instance, the longer NorNed cable also cost around $900 million but for a 360 mile cable, so again, prices are relative and based on efficiency as much as project scope. In the past, when Icelandic politicians pitched the effort, they have cited a cost of around $7 billion. Related: Shrinking Norwegian Natural Gas Production Puts Europe In Dire Situation

Using a very rough cost of $2-9 billion for the Iceland/UK link, it’s worth asking about how economical the project would be. The BritNed cable has a capacity of 1000 MW or 1 million kilowatts. Assuming the UK/Iceland cable had the same capacity, and Iceland could produce enough power to supply it fully all year round, this would mean 8,760 hours of power or 8.76 billion kWh. That, in turn, implies a cost per kWh of carrying capacity of anywhere from around $0.22 to $1. These numbers are just theoretical, of course.

Iceland’s national power company has done a number of studies on the viability of a link with Scotland over the years, but until recently the proposal had not been deemed economically worthwhile. With rising power prices, this looks set to change. The Iceland/UK link would provide sufficient energy to power around 1.6 million British households according to the National Icelandic Power company Landsvirkjun. Related: The Race To Develop The Ultimate Battery

The deal would supply the British with power at a cost 15 percent below market rates in theory, but the bill for the cable would likely have to be paid for by British taxpayers or industry rather than the 320,000 Icelanders.

The Iceland/UK proposal has been made before, but as the world continues to look to lower its carbon footprint and introduce new alternative energy sources, it is just possible that the time might be right to actually start forward on a subsea cable between the countries.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Philip Branton on November 04 2015 said:
    Mr. McDonald,

    Your attention to this subject and issue is great. Great strides have been made concerning energy transmission. It would be nice to see a breakout of the various designs in a "social contest". It would be really nice to see this breakout also take into consideration the energy produced by the Yellowstone National Geo-Thermal power grid so all veterans and citizens could actually see the choices that they could "demand" to power their own homes or electric cars. Furthermore, we wonder how an "open" solicitation from "investors" could actually drive the cost down for this Icelandic project so the Geo-thermal taps being planned in Africa could open up the transparency. What would also be interesting is to see just how many Russian or Iranian readers would link to this article plotted on a timeline as the "social contest" was being played..!


    Philip Branton

    (P.S.....this one article alone could swing 2016 elections if a certain map was used during a debate...)
  • John Scior on November 05 2015 said:
    I think it might be more useful for Iceland to utilize their surplus electricity by converting salty sea water into hydrogen through electrolysis. The hydrogen could be exported to all over the world. In fact in areas where there are water shortages, the hydrogen could be recombined with oxygen to not only provide electricity but also fresh water as well. Now your market base is not just the UK , but also all over the world.
  • Richard Corbin on November 07 2015 said:
    Hawaii tried geothermal. Spent a billion on it. Once completed, it was shut down because the Local "coconuts" that bow and pray ???? to their Volcano God, they call Peele, complained and filed a Federal suit under the guise of Religion, that their God was upset with Geothermal projects and even more angered by the White Caucasian infestation of the Hawaii Island Chain.

    That was said to say this, look at all the angles that could shut down the project before it can even get started or once completed, shut it down.

    Ask yourself, look around to see if there are any Hawaiian coconuts nearby.
  • Skuli Johannsson on November 08 2015 said:
    The statistics tells us that the probability of failure of subsea power cables is 0.1 times per year per 100 km. With a 1000 km subsea cable from Iceland to UK then it would be 1 times per year. The Iceland-UK subsea cable would be the first of its kind crossing an outer ocean, the Atlantic. If failure occurs in the autumn, maybe we would have to wait until next spring to get a weather window for repairing. This aspect has until now been avoided by the power companies involved, both in Iceland and UK. What kind of measures would have to be done to lower the risk of failure and at what cost?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News