• 4 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 7 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 2 hours Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 19 hours India After Elections: Economy And Hindu Are The First Modi’s Challenges
  • 16 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 6 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 13 hours Theresa May to Step Down
  • 6 hours Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 20 hours Old - New Kim: Nuclear Negotiations With U. S. Will Never Resume Unless Washington Changes Its Position
  • 16 hours Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 8 hours IRAN makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . U.S. makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . IRAQ steps up and plays the mediator. THIS ALLOWS BOTH SIDES TO "SAVE FACE". Then serious negotiations start.
  • 227 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
  • 18 hours Compensation For A Trade War: Argentina’s Financial Crisis Creates An Opportunity For China
  • 14 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
Futurity

Futurity

Futurity covers research news from the top universities in the US, UK, Canada and Australia

More Info

Trending Discussions

Marginal Lands: Unfit for Food Crops, but Perfect for Biofuel Plants

Land unfit for food crops can be prime real estate for biofuel plants—and could produce an estimated 5.5 billion gallons of ethanol in the Midwest alone.

In the current issue of Nature, a team of researchers shows that these “marginal” lands represent a huge untapped resource to grow mixed species cellulosic biomass.

 “Understanding the environmental impact of widespread biofuel production is a major unanswered question both in the US and worldwide,” says Ilya Gelfand, lead author and postdoctoral researcher at Michigan State University.

“We estimate that using marginal lands for growing cellulosic biomass crops could provide up to 215 gallons of ethanol per acre with substantial greenhouse gas mitigation.”

The notion of making better use of marginal land has been around for nearly 15 years. However, this is the first study to provide an estimate for the greenhouse gas benefits as well as an assessment of the total potential for these lands to produce significant amounts of biomass, he adds.

Relevant Article: Four New Developments Leading Canada's Biofuel Revolution

Focusing on 10 Midwest states, Great Lakes Bioenergy researchers used 20 years of data from the Kellogg Biological Station LTER Site to characterize the comparative productivity and greenhouse gas impacts of different crops, including corn, poplar, alfalfa, and old field vegetation.

They then used a supercomputer to identify and model biomass production that could grow enough feedstock to support a local biorefinery with a capacity of at least 24 million gallons per year. The final tally of 5.5 billion gallons of ethanol represents about 25 percent of Congress’ 2022 cellulosic biofuels target, says Phil Robertson, co-author and professor of crop, soil, and microbial sciences at Michigan State University.

“The value of marginal land for energy production has been long-speculated and often discounted,” he says. “This study shows that these lands could make a major contribution to transportation energy needs while providing substantial climate and—if managed properly—conservation benefits.”

This also is the first study to show that grasses and other non-woody plants that grow naturally on unmanaged lands are sufficiently productive to make ethanol production worthwhile. Conservative numbers were used in the study, and production efficiency could be increased by carefully selecting the mix of plant species, Robertson adds.

Relevant Article: 5 Biofuel Trends to Watch Out for in 2013

“With conservation in mind, these marginal lands can be made productive for bioenergy production and, in so doing, contribute to avoid the conflict between food and fuel production,” says Cesar Izaurralde, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory soil scientist and adjunct professor at the University of Maryland.

Additional benefits for using marginal lands include:

•    New revenue for farmers and other landowners
•    No indirect land-use effects, where land in another part of the globe is cleared to replace land lost here to food production
•    No carbon debt from land conversion if existing vegetation is used or if new perennial crops are planted directly into existing vegetation

The Department of Energy’s Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, the National Science Foundation, and MSU AgBioResearch funded the researcher. Additional researchers from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the University of Maryland contributed to the study.

By. Layne Cameron




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News