WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Financial Sector To Cut Credit Supply Lines For Oil And Gas Industry

Financial Sector To Cut Credit Supply Lines For Oil And Gas Industry

More U.S. oil and gas companies could come under financial distress in the coming months as crucial hedging protection begins to expire.

Many companies had locked in high prices for their oil sales last year, allowing them a degree of protection as oil prices collapsed precipitously over the second half of 2014. Few, if any, hedged all of their production though, so revenues declined along with the oil price. Still, with some protection, the vast majority of companies (aside from a tragic handful) have not missed debt payments and have stayed out of bankruptcy.

That could become an increasingly tricky feat to pull off. As time passes, more and more hedges are expiring, leaving oil companies fully exposed to the painfully low oil price environment. “A lot of these smaller guys who had bad balance sheets have pretty good hedge books through full-year 2015,” Andrew Byrne, an analyst with IHS, told the Houston Chronicle. “You can't say that about 2016.” Related: Is George Soros Betting on the Long-Term Future of Coal?

In fact, about one-fifth of North American production is hedged at a median price of $87.51 per barrel. Smaller companies rely much more heavily upon hedging as they are more vulnerable to price swings and are not diversified with downstream assets. Across the industry, IHS estimates that smaller companies had about half of their production hedged at a median oil price of $89.86 per barrel in 2015.

But as those positions expire, any new hedges will be linked to current oil prices, which are now trading around $45 per barrel (although prices are fluctuating with great intensity and ferocity these days).

More worrying for the oil and gas companies that are struggling to keep their lights on is the forthcoming credit redeterminations, which typically take place in April and September. Banks recalculate credit lines for drillers, using oil prices as a key determinant of an individual company’s viability. With oil prices bouncing around near six-year lows, more companies will find themselves on the wrong side of that equation. Related: Canada’s Oilfield Service Sector Battered By Low Prices

Banks were more lenient in April when oil prices were a bit higher and many analysts expected prices to rise. This time around the pain is mounting and there will be a lot less leeway. Somewhere around 10 to 15 percent credit offered to drillers could be cut back on average, a move that could slash $15 billion in credit capacity, according to CreditSights Inc.

With other financial avenues cut off, indebted drillers could be left with no way out. “Nobody is in good shape with oil at $39,” CreditSights Inc. analyst Brian Gibbons told Bloomberg in an interview. “Most energy companies are shut out of the debt markets. There are few companies that can get a deal done right now.”

Even if banks wanted to lend to struggling oil and gas drillers, or were open to the idea of restructuring existing loans, there is another looming problem for the industry: the possibility of increased regulatory pressure on the banks exposed to energy loans. According to the FT, banking regulators are pushing banks to take a more conservative approach to their energy loans. If loans to indebted oil companies appear at risk, regulators want banks to move their loans into “workout” groups, which are run by “troubled asset specialists” with the mission to recover as much of the loans as possible. Related: We Could See An Economic Collapse As Debt Defaults Pile Up

The procedure is intended to guard against bank failures, but in effect, it could force distressed oil and gas companies to prematurely sell off assets and/or lose access to their financing. “Workout’s job is to achieve the maximum recovery on the loan,” Bill White, Chairman of Houston branch of investment bank Lazard, told the FT. “The banking relationship with the borrower is not part of the agenda of the workout group, whereas the relationship banker will appreciate the fact this is a cyclical period.”

“One consequence of this would be that people are forced to sell assets in a market which many of us — including me — believe is at the bottom of the commodity price cycle,” he added.

But it is not as if regulators are off base. In Canada, the largest banks are reporting higher impairment charges on their portfolios as oil prices stay low. For example, TD Bank saw its impairment charges rise by two-thirds this quarter compared to the second. CIBC, RBC, and the Bank of Montreal all reported a sharp increase in impairment charges as well. Given the growing losses for energy lenders, the oil and gas industry could see access to credit much harder to come by in the weeks and months ahead.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Lee James on September 03 2015 said:
    The status of unconventional petroleum in the U.S. is under debate. On the one side is the optimistic view that the industry will rebound on innovation and less oversupply; on the other is the view that unconventional petroleum is inherently expensive and it is past-time to accelerate our transition to alternatives.

    The side suggesting inevitable rebound points to slow growth of reasonable alternatives, technological innovation in extraction, and bottoming out of a natural cycle of low crude prices.

    Those recommending greater emphasis on alternatives to unconventional petroleum point to a reduction in profitable core producing areas, rapid well production decline rates, a huge environmental health tab that largely remains "for someone else to pay," and -- as outlined in the present article -- expiration of high-price crude hedges and lower credit rating determinations for the industry.

    I think there's been a lot of hype in the unconventional petroleum gambit. Proponents continue to pitch this sector, but is it really what our country and the world needs?

    The unconventional methods -- fracking source-rock, deep-water, tar sands, and Arctic -- are a long ways from "bonanza," and a lot more like scraping bottom.
  • Eduardo on September 04 2015 said:
    In Argentina an "unusual " country in which I´ve been born and dwell for the last 50 years , the other 24 I spent abroad or sailing from one place to the other
    ,and at present live in a semi desrtic place in the NW growing choice veggies for choice restaurants.
    About 4 years ago they discovered what was called "the second largest unconventional oil field " , guess where the first one is, the thing is called Vaca Muerta ( dead cow ), luckily though the thing is in the midst of a huge desert , the news is Chevron hurriedly signed a contract , that I´m sure is far fron clean , since the goverment has kept it a secret from everyone, as you know secrets in govermnent are only devised to hide the dirt .
    The point is that after what looks to be the last gasps of the industry , not a word has been herd from either of the two signataries, so I hope we have saved a few million gallons of water to the welfare of foxes, guanacos, hares and a wide variety of fauna living in the place.
    I only urge anyone having some diffrerent news to drop me a line.
    Best wishes, Eduardo

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News