• 40 mins OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 16 hours U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 18 hours Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 20 hours Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 22 hours EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 24 hours Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 1 day Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 4 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 4 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 4 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 4 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 5 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 5 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 5 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 5 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 5 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 6 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 6 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 6 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 7 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 7 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 7 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
  • 7 days Record U.S. Crude Exports Squeeze North Sea Oil
  • 7 days Iraq Aims To Reopen Kirkuk-Turkey Oil Pipeline Bypassing Kurdistan
  • 7 days Supply Crunch To Lead To Oil Price Spike By 2020s, Expert Says
  • 7 days Saudi Arabia Ups November Oil Exports To 7-Million Bpd
  • 7 days Niger Delta State Looks To Break Free From Oil
  • 8 days Brazilian Conglomerate To Expand Into Renewables
  • 8 days Kurdish Independence Could Spark Civil War
  • 8 days Chevron, Total Waiting In The Wings As Shell Mulls Majnoon Exit

Breaking News:

OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%

Alt Text

Is The Aramco IPO On The Brink Of Collapse?

Conflicting news suggests that Saudi…

Alt Text

This Unexpected Move Could Derail Mexico’s Oil Boom

A possibly disastrous move from…

Alt Text

The Bearish Backlash In Energy This Fall

While September has been an…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Is The EIA Exaggerating U.S. Oil Production?


Oil is back at $50 per barrel, restoring some semblance of confidence in the market. But that is just about as much as we can expect in terms of a rally, according to most analysts, with momentum likely to dissipate from here.

But not everyone agrees. Many are worried that oil prices will crash again next year as OPEC scrambles for an exit strategy, but there is actually a bullish case for oil that is not outlandish.

First, crude oil inventories continue to fall. The EIA just released another week’s worth of data, showing another drawdown in inventories. It was a bit more modest last week – 1.5 million barrels – compared to previous four weeks, but the drawdowns continue. U.S. crude oil inventories are now down more than 50 million barrels from the peak hit in March, with stocks back within the five-year range.

But a larger reason why oil prices could deviate from expectations and actually rise quite a bit is because the market is poetically assuming a lot more oil is set to come online than might actually be the case. As Andy Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates, notes in a CNBC column, the market has already factored in further production gains from Libya and Nigeria, a major reason why market pessimism really spread in the month of June. But because that assumption is baked into today’s price, if those two countries – beset with violence and instability – fail to come through, then a lot less oil will reach the market than is generally assumed. Related: Iraq Dethrones Saudi Arabia As India’s No.1 Oil Supplier

Moreover, the U.S. could also disappoint. As discussed in previous articles, the shale drilling boom is starting to slow. A bottleneck of services is held back the completion of some wells, while many shale companies have actually started to throttle back on their spending and drilling activity. In the past few weeks, a list of companies have announced cuts to spending plans for this year, including Anadarko Petroleum, ConocoPhillips, Whiting Petroleum, Hess Corp., and Pioneer Natural Resources. Those five companies alone have slashed a combined $850 million in spending.

The cuts, coming in response to the recent dip of oil prices into the mid-$40s, will likely translate into much lower production next year. As a result, the projection from the EIA that shale will hit 10 million barrels per day (mb/d) in 2018, or even the more recent downward revision to just 9.9 mb/d, could be hard to reach.

However, there is one other important uncertainty that could point to higher oil prices in the near-term. Not only will future production come in lower than expected, but what if current production is actually lower than we think? What if we are overestimating the shale boom?

The market bases its expectations for U.S. oil on the EIA weekly production surveys, which have shown a steady climb in output right up through July. The most recent data for the week ending on July 28 pegs current U.S. oil production at 9.43 mb/d.

But the thing is, these weekly estimates are not always accurate, and are often subject to revisions – sometimes large revisions – later on. On the other hand, the EIA publishes more accurate monthly figures, but only on a several month lag. The most recent data is for May, which has U.S. oil production at 9.169 mb/d.

The problem is that there is quite a gap between these two sources, with the more recent but less accurate weekly figures reflecting much higher oil production.

For example, while the EIA is now pretty certain the U.S. averaged 9.169 mb/d in May, that wasn’t what they thought at the time. Back in May, the EIA published these weekly estimates:

• May 5: 9.314 mb/d

• May 12: 9.305 mb/d

• May 19: 9.320 mb/d

• May 26: 9.342 mb/d

To take a rough average, that would put May’s monthly production at 9.32 mb/d. In other words, back in May, the EIA was telling everyone that the U.S. was producing 151,000 bpd more than it actually was. This is not to put the blame on the EIA – estimating production in essentially real-time is difficult – but only to say that we only get an accurate picture of what is going on by looking in the rear-view mirror. Related: Solar And Wind Revolution Happening Much Faster Than Expected

Which brings us back to the present. The EIA is now estimating that the U.S. is producing 9.43 mb/d, a figure that has steadily climbed in the past few months. But that would mean that production accelerated very rapidly since May. In the chart below, notice the jump that would need to take place between the monthly figures through May, and the weekly figures up until now.

This is a long-winded way of saying that U.S. oil production could quite conceivably be much lower than 9.43 mb/d right now. In that context, the slowdown in the rig count and the cuts to spending look even more important. Not only will the U.S. fall short of the projections for the rest of this year and next, but it could miss by quite a lot. If that is the case, then oil prices suddenly do not look like they are necessarily trapped at $50 per barrel.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • jack ma on August 04 2017 said:
    Of course they are. They also report 400 barrels in surplus but it's paper oil going all the way back to the 800,000 bpd each day of missing oil from 2015. They are part of the team defending the dollar against the BRICS dedollarization war. IMHO
  • Disgruntled on August 04 2017 said:
    Thanks, Nick, for shining some light on the EIAs' numbers game. You should look into their global demand estimates vs the "revised" actual number over the last several years. Over and over again, the stories (on oilprice.com, I might add) speak of "waning demand" or "falling demand" when referring to yearly demand increases of only 1.2 - 1.3 million barrels/day. Then the revised number comes out the next year and it turns out to be 1.5 - 1.6 million barrels/day, or more. IMHO, Mr. Ma, it's all about creating (discouraging) sentiment that factors into decisions to set the price of oil in the near term, and consequently, the longer term out in fantasy time. I imagine when there's an actual shortage of oil that the stories will speak of "future gluts".
  • rjs on August 04 2017 said:
    the correct word is “overestimating”; dont assume a nefarious intention…earlier this year they were underestimating the weekly output, and when the corrected monthly numbers came out 2 months later they were higher….they report production on Wednesdays for the previous week, and those aren’t meant to be any more than guidance, there’s a lot of data to be gathered from thousands of wells before they can come up with a number that’s close to accurate..
  • Me on August 04 2017 said:
    Just more fake statistics from the gov'ment...does anyone actually believe them or care what they say? Do you think the unemployment rate is 5% ... or inflation is 3%? If so I have some shale driller stock to sell you...just ignore the balance sheet & income statement---they just IP'd 5 wells at 3kb/d each .... must be a gold mine!!!!
  • EMH on August 04 2017 said:
    The financial markets already take the weekly/monthly issue into account. You are assuming a very trivial trading opportunity.
  • Citizen Oil on August 07 2017 said:
    When have the oil numbers or NG numbers ever been accurate ? They should do a monthly or quarterly report that is 100% accurate so people have an idea what is really going on . The errors are laughable even between the Tuesday /Wednesday API and EIA numbers. The current system just isn't credible.
  • Demand matters on August 07 2017 said:
    Lot of Managed money the is long futures is also short E&P equities. This trade worked well after after Q117 when demand moderated for the first time in the past 3 years combined by additional Libyan Oil hitting the market. Now this trade needs to unwind. After Libyan production and depleted global inventories, there are no more sources of cheap oil left. Oil is coming out of the cheapest storage in US.

    Market will need the US oil production going forward. First time in almost 5 years the E&Ps are a good buy.

    Demand is higher (Q1Was weak due to high prices) and production is lower. Nothing else can explain increased refinery and vanishing inventories. Analysts and media is explain or make sense of price action - not to say what's happening does not make sense, that's the traders job. Lower prices and higher demand are actually setting up crude for a spike earlier than expected.

    Demand is on fire. It'll be reflected in prices in the coming months when the Asian demand picks up. But many futures longs would want to cover their E&P shorts before being aggressive on futures buying. I suspect the global inventories will force the issue earlier.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News