• 5 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 8 minutes Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 11 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 16 minutes Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 1 hour *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 27 mins Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 7 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 40 mins Emissions from wear of brakes and tyres likely to be higher in supposedly clean vehicles, experts warn
  • 7 hours UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 8 mins How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 2 days Connection Between Climate Rules And German's No-Limit Autobahns? Strange, But It Exists
  • 4 hours Is Natural Gas Renewable? I say yes it is.
  • 2 days Conspiracy - Theory versus Reality
  • 2 days Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 2 days Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 7 hours Saudi Private Jet Industry Stalls After Corruption Crackdown
Alt Text

Refiners Aren’t To Blame For Climate Change

Big Oil is often criticized…

Alt Text

Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Set New Record

The average concentration of atmospheric…

Joao Peixe

Joao Peixe

Joao is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Harvard Study Challenges EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Figures

A new study by Harvard University researchers on greenhouse gas emissions in the US claims that the level of methane leaks into the atmosphere may be 50% higher than suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The study claims that methane emissions from human activities such as natural gas production or livestock raising were twice as high, or higher, than EPA estimates, while in some south-central regions, emissions from fossil fuel extraction and refining may be up to five times higher than estimated.

Related article: How to Stop the Inexorable Progress of Climate Change

"Our numbers for the entire US are about a factor of 1.5 times larger than the EPA’s estimate," says the study's co-author Scot Miller, a doctoral student at Harvard University. He said that the numbers present a serious discrepancy, considering the hundreds of millions of tons of a very potent greenhouse gas going up every year.

The new study is based on data from some 13,000 measurements of atmospheric methane levels taken in 2007 and 2008, just as natural gas production from fracking was starting to ramp up.

The researchers then used weather data and other information to extrapolate the likely sources of the methane. They plan to use the data as a baseline to see how emissions have changed in more recent years.

"We don't know why there's such a discrepancy,” says co-author Steven Wofsy, an atmospheric and environmental professor at Harvard University's School of Engineering and Applied Science. He said it may be that the EPA is not measuring every possible source such as broken natural gas pipes that are leaking methane.

Related article: The Battle Against Climate Change: Does the World Need Saving?

“This discrepancy casts doubt on the agency's recent decision to downscale its estimate of national natural gas emissions by 25 to 30 percent, " the study concluded.

The authors are now examining more recent data, which would account for the sharp increase in oil and gas drilling in the US in recent years.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News