• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 15 mins DUMB IT DOWN-IMPEACHMENT
  • 15 mins Greta named Time Magazine "Person of the Year"
  • 5 hours POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 2 hours Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 5 hours americavchina.com
  • 6 hours Forget The Hype, Aramco Shares May be Valued At Zero Next Year
  • 1 day WTO is effectively neutered. Trump *already* won the trade war against China and WTO is helpless to intervene
  • 1 day Democrats through impeachment process helped Trump go out of China deal conundrum. Now Trump can safely postpone deal till after November 2020 elections
  • 7 hours Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 6 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
  • 16 hours Can Renewable Natural Gas Compete With Diesel?
Alt Text

What To Expect From The European Green New Deal

The European Commission is set…

Alt Text

Is This The Only Way To Curb Global Warming?

Unless greenhouse gas emissions fall…

Joao Peixe

Joao Peixe

Joao is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Harvard Study Challenges EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Figures

A new study by Harvard University researchers on greenhouse gas emissions in the US claims that the level of methane leaks into the atmosphere may be 50% higher than suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The study claims that methane emissions from human activities such as natural gas production or livestock raising were twice as high, or higher, than EPA estimates, while in some south-central regions, emissions from fossil fuel extraction and refining may be up to five times higher than estimated.

Related article: How to Stop the Inexorable Progress of Climate Change

"Our numbers for the entire US are about a factor of 1.5 times larger than the EPA’s estimate," says the study's co-author Scot Miller, a doctoral student at Harvard University. He said that the numbers present a serious discrepancy, considering the hundreds of millions of tons of a very potent greenhouse gas going up every year.

The new study is based on data from some 13,000 measurements of atmospheric methane levels taken in 2007 and 2008, just as natural gas production from fracking was starting to ramp up.

The researchers then used weather data and other information to extrapolate the likely sources of the methane. They plan to use the data as a baseline to see how emissions have changed in more recent years.

"We don't know why there's such a discrepancy,” says co-author Steven Wofsy, an atmospheric and environmental professor at Harvard University's School of Engineering and Applied Science. He said it may be that the EPA is not measuring every possible source such as broken natural gas pipes that are leaking methane.

Related article: The Battle Against Climate Change: Does the World Need Saving?

“This discrepancy casts doubt on the agency's recent decision to downscale its estimate of national natural gas emissions by 25 to 30 percent, " the study concluded.

The authors are now examining more recent data, which would account for the sharp increase in oil and gas drilling in the US in recent years.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play