• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 3 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 25 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 5 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 15 mins Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 10 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 3 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 15 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 14 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 3 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 14 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 16 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 23 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 6 hours < sigh > $90 Oil Is A Very Real Possibility
Alt Text

Oil Majors See Profit In Carbon Capture And Storage

carbon capture and storage technology…

Alt Text

Did This Startup Solve The Carbon Capture Challenge?

Costs have long prohibited carbon…

Alt Text

Europe’s Toxic Radiation Cloud Remains A Mystery

Last month’s mysterious radiation cloud…

Joao Peixe

Joao Peixe

Joao is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Harvard Study Challenges EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Figures

Harvard Study Challenges EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Figures

A new study by Harvard University researchers on greenhouse gas emissions in the US claims that the level of methane leaks into the atmosphere may be 50% higher than suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The study claims that methane emissions from human activities such as natural gas production or livestock raising were twice as high, or higher, than EPA estimates, while in some south-central regions, emissions from fossil fuel extraction and refining may be up to five times higher than estimated.

Related article: How to Stop the Inexorable Progress of Climate Change

"Our numbers for the entire US are about a factor of 1.5 times larger than the EPA’s estimate," says the study's co-author Scot Miller, a doctoral student at Harvard University. He said that the numbers present a serious discrepancy, considering the hundreds of millions of tons of a very potent greenhouse gas going up every year.

The new study is based on data from some 13,000 measurements of atmospheric methane levels taken in 2007 and 2008, just as natural gas production from fracking was starting to ramp up.

The researchers then used weather data and other information to extrapolate the likely sources of the methane. They plan to use the data as a baseline to see how emissions have changed in more recent years.

"We don't know why there's such a discrepancy,” says co-author Steven Wofsy, an atmospheric and environmental professor at Harvard University's School of Engineering and Applied Science. He said it may be that the EPA is not measuring every possible source such as broken natural gas pipes that are leaking methane.

Related article: The Battle Against Climate Change: Does the World Need Saving?

“This discrepancy casts doubt on the agency's recent decision to downscale its estimate of national natural gas emissions by 25 to 30 percent, " the study concluded.

The authors are now examining more recent data, which would account for the sharp increase in oil and gas drilling in the US in recent years.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News