• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 3 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 21 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 11 hours Today in Energy
  • 2 hours Iran Captures British Tanker sailing through Straits of Hormuz
  • 2 hours Oil Rises After Iran Says It Seized Foreign Tanker In Gulf
  • 6 hours Drone For Drone = War: What is next in the U.S. - Iran the Gulf Episode
  • 1 day Mnuchin Says No Change To U.S. Dollar Policy ‘As of Now’
  • 1 day Populist, But Good: Elizabeth Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds
  • 2 days Washington Post hit piece attacking oil, Christians and Trump
  • 1 day Why Natural Gas is Natural
  • 2 days Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 22 hours LA Solar Power/Storage Contract
  • 2 days Excellent Choice: Germany's Von der Leyen Secures Powerful EU Executive Top Job
Joao Peixe

Joao Peixe

Joao is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Harvard Study Challenges EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Figures

A new study by Harvard University researchers on greenhouse gas emissions in the US claims that the level of methane leaks into the atmosphere may be 50% higher than suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The study claims that methane emissions from human activities such as natural gas production or livestock raising were twice as high, or higher, than EPA estimates, while in some south-central regions, emissions from fossil fuel extraction and refining may be up to five times higher than estimated.

Related article: How to Stop the Inexorable Progress of Climate Change

"Our numbers for the entire US are about a factor of 1.5 times larger than the EPA’s estimate," says the study's co-author Scot Miller, a doctoral student at Harvard University. He said that the numbers present a serious discrepancy, considering the hundreds of millions of tons of a very potent greenhouse gas going up every year.

The new study is based on data from some 13,000 measurements of atmospheric methane levels taken in 2007 and 2008, just as natural gas production from fracking was starting to ramp up.

The researchers then used weather data and other information to extrapolate the likely sources of the methane. They plan to use the data as a baseline to see how emissions have changed in more recent years.

"We don't know why there's such a discrepancy,” says co-author Steven Wofsy, an atmospheric and environmental professor at Harvard University's School of Engineering and Applied Science. He said it may be that the EPA is not measuring every possible source such as broken natural gas pipes that are leaking methane.

Related article: The Battle Against Climate Change: Does the World Need Saving?

“This discrepancy casts doubt on the agency's recent decision to downscale its estimate of national natural gas emissions by 25 to 30 percent, " the study concluded.

The authors are now examining more recent data, which would account for the sharp increase in oil and gas drilling in the US in recent years.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play