• 4 minutes US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 7 minutes Why Trump will win the wall fight
  • 11 minutes Oil imports by countries
  • 13 minutes Maduro Asks OPEC For Help Against U.S. Sanctions
  • 16 hours Climate Change: A Summer of Storms and Smog Is Coming
  • 15 hours Tension On The Edge: Pakistan Urges U.N. To Intervene Over Kashmir Tension With India
  • 16 hours The Quick Read On MBS's Tour of Pakistan, India And China
  • 14 hours Teens For Climate: Swedish Student Leader Wins EU Pledge To Spend Billions On Climate
  • 15 hours BMW to add 2,000 more jobs at Dingolfing plant
  • 16 hours Iran Starts Gulf War Games, To Test Submarine-Launched Missiles
  • 17 hours Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro closes border with Brazil
  • 1 day Amazon’s Exit Could Scare Off Tech Companies From New York
  • 1 day Itt looks like natural gas may be at its lowest price ever.
  • 18 hours Saudi A to Splash $100 Bln on India
  • 11 hours Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 13 hours Indian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. OilIndian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. Oil
  • 1 day NEW FERUKA REFINERY
Alt Text

This Year, Everyone Will Love Uranium

Utilities have been buying uranium…

Alt Text

Tech Giants Scramble To Secure Cobalt Supply

Apple is leading the way…

Alt Text

Miners Are Looking To Ramp Up Lithium Production

Lithium prices have withstood all…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

What to Look For When Investing in an Exploration Company

Calling all mineral explorers. Australia needs your help.

The Australian Institute of Geosciences (AIG) this week released a report noting that the Aussie exploration sector is suffering.

AIG blames the decline on a few things. Major producing companies moving out of greenfields exploration, to focus on near-mine exploration. And lack of a "flow-through" tax scheme that would allow investors in exploration companies to claim significant tax credits, making investment in exploration more attractive.

The upshot being that companies with money are choosing not to explore. And companies that want to explore are having a hard time getting money.

AIG sees this (rightly) as a big issue. The group notes that just six Aussie mines account for a disproportionate amount of output: 86% of copper production, 93% of lead production, 69% of zinc production and 77% of silver production.

More worryingly, five of these six mines are classified as mature (Olympic Dam being the only "young pup"). Across the top gold producing mines in the nation, the average age is a ripe 24 years.

Exploration is obviously critical to ensuring the development pipeline that will keep the smelters in business over the coming decades. But how to pay for it?

This is global problem. Countries like Canada have dealt with it to a certain to agree by introducing the aforementioned "flow-through" tax scheme. Exploration companies get tax credits for the geophysical surveys they fly and the drill holes they put in the ground. They then pass these credits to investors, increasing the likelihood of a positive return on investment.

But this alone can't make up for the hard truth: exploration is a tricky business. How do you attract capital to sector where success rates run below 1%?

With exploration increasingly being left to the junior sector (a number of majors have recently down-sized or eliminated their exploration departments), a few answers are emerging about how exploration will get funded.

The first and most prevalent way is through manias. Irrational enthusiasm for a country or a particular metal tends to loosen investors' purse strings.

Millions of dollars have been raised for exploration in Colombia and the rare earth metals over the past year. Not because prospects in either of these spaces are head-and-shoulders above other areas. Simply because investors got fired up on these stories.

Smart (or opportunistic) explorers use these boom times to stock up on capital. The smart ones will make it last through the inevitable downturn.

Another way to finance exploration is come up with a better business model. The "project generator" companies have been doing this for years.

These companies are in the idea business. They apply their geologic knowledge and come up with mostly-conceptual exploration plays. The good ones then sell these ideas to other, well-funded companies (majors or the opportunistic juniors who raised capital in a boom and have now run out of their own ideas).

Project generators retain interests in all of their projects without having to spend much capital on exploration. Companies like Auex Ventures have used this model to succeed with important greenfields discoveries recently.

Then there's the rarest type of explorer. The truly excellent.

There are a few exploration teams on the planet that seem to be capable of reliably coming up with really, really good concepts. Usually this involves a combination of technical skill and patience.

These teams (or sometimes just one individual) are willing to sift through thousands of exploration ideas until they find the one they know will work. Most companies identify the successful 1% of exploration projects through drilling. The great ones do it in their heads, appraising potential projects against their well-honed internal checklist for success and then relentlessly discarding plays until they find one that fits the bill perfectly. The follow-on drilling is simply confirmation.

These are people like David Lowell. They're certainly not common. But the few that do exist are good enough to attract funding no matter what is going on in the wider sector.

Next time you look at buying into an exploration company, ask: which model am I paying up for?

By. Dave Forest of Notela Resources




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News