• 4 minutes Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 7 minutes Hydrogen Capable Natural Gas Turbines
  • 10 minutes World looks on in horror as Trump flails over pandemic despite claims US leads way
  • 13 minutes Large gas belt discovered in China
  • 35 mins Chicago Threatens To Condemn - Possibly Demolish - Churches Defying Lockdown
  • 3 hours The CDC confirms remarkably low coronavirus death rate. Where is the media?
  • 5 hours COVID 19 May Be Less Deadly Than Flu Study Finds
  • 18 mins Let’s Try This....
  • 2 hours New Aussie "big batteries"
  • 18 hours Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Times of Large Debt:
  • 4 hours China to Impose Dictatorship on Hong Kong
  • 6 hours 60 mph electric mopeds
  • 10 hours Iran's first oil tanker has arrived near Venezuela
  • 13 hours Nothing can shake AMLO’s fossil-fuel fixation
  • 19 hours US-China tech competition accelerates: on Friday 05/15 new sanctions on Huawei, on Monday 05/18 Samsung chief visits China
  • 1 day Fed Says It Will Begin Buying Corporate-Debt ETFs on Tuesday
IEA: Peak Oil Demand Is Still Years Away

IEA: Peak Oil Demand Is Still Years Away

The world hasn’t seen peak…

Xstrata-Glencore Merger in the Air over Management Dispute

Time is running out; Xstrata has until Monday to accept Glencore’s $90 billion takeover bid. However the deal has hit a snag which is proving difficult to overcome, and could prove to be the death of the merger.

Glencore’s initial offer of 2.8 of its own shares for every Xstrata share was rejected by some of the large Xstrata shareholders who threatened to block the deal unless an improvement was made.

Glencore upped the offer to a ratio of 3.05 to 1, but also changed other conditions of the merger, and it is here that the problem has arisen.

Glencore has altered the makeup of the new company in order to give them more control over management. In the original deal Xstrata were going to be given most of the control of the company, with the CEO Mick Davis, Chairman John Bond, and CFO Trevor Reid, keeping their positions in the new company. Now, however, Glencore are demanding that their CEO Ivan Glasenberg will replace Mick Davis, and Xstrata shareholders worry that this will cause their top executives to resign.

Back when the merger was first proposed Xstrata’s directors noted that “the new business model resulting from the merger, and its ability to generate superior shareholder returns, is dependent on the retention of key Xstrata personnel,” which makes it “essential for the success of the merger.”

The problem is not to do with ego or corporate pride, it is about the expertise that those executives bring to the new company.

Xstrata is a huge mining company, and Glencore is one of the largest international traders of materials such as what, oil, and copper. The two businesses are completely different. Mining is a long term investment, whereas trading is fast paced, requiring rapid decisions in order to reap short term profits.

Mining will dominate the operations of the new company, accounting for around 84% of operating profits, but if Glencore executives take positions of power ahead of Xstrata, then vital mining expertise will be lost which could negatively affect the health of the company in the future.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News