• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 4 hours OPEC will consider all options. What options do they have ?
  • 4 hours Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 48 mins Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 7 hours What to tell my students
  • 5 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 4 hours A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 11 hours Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 5 hours China Threatens to Withhold Rare Earth Metals
  • 7 hours With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
  • 20 hours TRUMP'S FORMER 'CHRISTIAN LIAISON' SAYS DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER WAS GOD'S PUNISHMENT FOR OBAMA ISRAEL DIVISION
  • 19 hours Maybe 8 to 10 "good" years left in oil industry * UAE model for Economic Deversification * Others spent oil billions on funding terrorism, wars, suppressing dissidents, building nukes * Too late now
  • 16 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 21 hours Flaring is at Record Highs in Texas

World Bank Tribunal Annuls Venezuela Damages Reward For Exxon

Venezuela

The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes annulled an earlier decision that would have seen Venezuela pay more than a billion dollars to Exxon for the nationalization of two projects it ran in the country.

The news was announced by a lawyer for the Venezuelan government, and the sum that has been spared Caracas, according to Reuters, is $1.4 billion. The initial award for damages from the ICSID, dating from 2014, was for $1.6 billion but Venezuela argued that another $908 million that the International Chamber of Commerce ruled to be paid to Exxon should be deducted from the initial reward.

The ICSID said the annulment only concerned parts of the sum, without providing any further details. Still, even at $1.6 billion, the compensation was substantially lower than what Exxon had asked for: $14.7 billion.

Exxon operated the Cero Negro heavy oil project in Venezuela and one smaller one, La Ceiba, before Hugo Chavez’s government seized the assets in the mid-2000s, as part of a strategy to redirect the profits away from Venezuela’s mineral resources, telecoms, and agriculture industries and toward social programs. However, Exxon, along with many other companies, were naturally unhappy with these developments and challenged the legality of the nationalization at international courts.

At the time, Exxon said that it had discussed possible partnership with PDVSA, the state-owned oil company, and the government, but the two sides had failed to agree on mutually acceptable compensation.

Related: Is The Oil Price Plunge A Turning Point?

An Exxon filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission from 2014 showed that its Venezuelan assets had 425 million barrels of crude in proved reserves and a net book value of $750 million.

After this latest ruling from the ICSID Exxon said it will “continue to evaluate its legal rights and determine next steps.”

Venezuela is still facing more than 20 court cases related to the nationalization wave.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Russ Ramey on March 11 2017 said:
    The Looters rarely net gain in the long run. Sadly part of doing business. The consumers always lose though, we pay for the heightened costs along the line.
  • Mark Sivad on March 10 2017 said:
    I recommended to one of the oil companies that entered Venezuela to purchase political risk insurance, they ignored me and are now out a lot of money.
  • Naomi on March 10 2017 said:
    Failure of Venezuela and Mexico to compensate for confiscation of oil investment does not bode well for reinvestment in those nations. Nor does it encourage investment in Saudi Aramco and Russia.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play