• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 4 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 3 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 39 mins Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 3 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 4 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 20 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 13 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 24 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 1 day Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 1 day WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 24 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 1 day California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 1 day Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
Who Profits From Iran’s Oil Major Exodus?

Who Profits From Iran’s Oil Major Exodus?

As sanctions on Iran move…

Why Is Big Oil So Excited About Alaskan Crude?

Why Is Big Oil So Excited About Alaskan Crude?

Alaskan officials have just published…

Woodside Cancel $45 Billion Onshore LNG Project in Favour of Offshore Plant

Woodside Petroleum has just announced that it is cancelling its $45 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Australia after it has decided that it no longer makes an economic sense. It is likely to consider an offshore floating LNG plant as a cheaper alternative.

Analysts at Macquarie have stated that “this decision will surprise few as the proposed onshore development always looked too economically, technically, environmentally and socially risky for too little reward.”

Developing LNG projects in Australia have started to face problems in recent years as costs have begun to escalate, and the shale boom in North America has produced far cheaper options elsewhere in the world. Australia is set to overtake the Qatar as the world’s largest exporter of LNG. Firms from around the world have invested over $140 billion in six new LNG plants over the last two and a half years, however it looks as though the future may rely on floating LNG plants rather than traditional onshore facilities, especially as this decision by Woodside may likely end all investor interest in onshore gas projects.

Related article: Australia Looks to Raise LNG Production by Nearly 30 Percent
   
JP Morgan estimates that a floating LNG project, similar to Shell’s floating LNG barge off the west coast of Australia, will help Woodside save 20%, reducing capital expenditure from around $44.6 billion for an onshore project, to $35.5 billion.

Woodside has also started to show more interest in North America, enquiring about the possibility of an LNG project in Canada.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News