• 4 minutes What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 7 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 12 minutes OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 15 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 9 hours End of EV Subsidies?
  • 15 hours Citi cuts Apple's price target
  • 9 hours Maersk's COO statment.
  • 5 hours GOODBYE FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCE!!
  • 11 hours Japan Effectively Bans China’s Huawei, ZTE From Government Contracts, Joining U.S
  • 11 hours Oil prices may go up, but will be below $70 a barrel in FY19: Hindustan Petroleum Chairman
  • 5 hours Asian stocks down
  • 13 hours USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 13 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 7 hours Trump accuses Google Of Hiding 'Fair Media' Coverage of him
  • 3 hours IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 5 hours Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
Is This The Answer To Global Warming?

Is This The Answer To Global Warming?

As the world attempts to…

Woodside Cancel $45 Billion Onshore LNG Project in Favour of Offshore Plant

Woodside Petroleum has just announced that it is cancelling its $45 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Australia after it has decided that it no longer makes an economic sense. It is likely to consider an offshore floating LNG plant as a cheaper alternative.

Analysts at Macquarie have stated that “this decision will surprise few as the proposed onshore development always looked too economically, technically, environmentally and socially risky for too little reward.”

Developing LNG projects in Australia have started to face problems in recent years as costs have begun to escalate, and the shale boom in North America has produced far cheaper options elsewhere in the world. Australia is set to overtake the Qatar as the world’s largest exporter of LNG. Firms from around the world have invested over $140 billion in six new LNG plants over the last two and a half years, however it looks as though the future may rely on floating LNG plants rather than traditional onshore facilities, especially as this decision by Woodside may likely end all investor interest in onshore gas projects.

Related article: Australia Looks to Raise LNG Production by Nearly 30 Percent
   
JP Morgan estimates that a floating LNG project, similar to Shell’s floating LNG barge off the west coast of Australia, will help Woodside save 20%, reducing capital expenditure from around $44.6 billion for an onshore project, to $35.5 billion.

Woodside has also started to show more interest in North America, enquiring about the possibility of an LNG project in Canada.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
-->