• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 14 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 1 day US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 8 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 12 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 20 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 4 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 1 day OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 8 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 1 day Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 22 hours 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 1 day A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 2 days U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 3 hours The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
Global Economy Throwing Up Red Flags For Oil

Global Economy Throwing Up Red Flags For Oil

Investors are feeling increasingly gloomy…

Oil Markets Ignore Growing Geopolitical Risk

Oil Markets Ignore Growing Geopolitical Risk

While geopolitical risks in the…

Woodside Cancel $45 Billion Onshore LNG Project in Favour of Offshore Plant

Woodside Petroleum has just announced that it is cancelling its $45 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Australia after it has decided that it no longer makes an economic sense. It is likely to consider an offshore floating LNG plant as a cheaper alternative.

Analysts at Macquarie have stated that “this decision will surprise few as the proposed onshore development always looked too economically, technically, environmentally and socially risky for too little reward.”

Developing LNG projects in Australia have started to face problems in recent years as costs have begun to escalate, and the shale boom in North America has produced far cheaper options elsewhere in the world. Australia is set to overtake the Qatar as the world’s largest exporter of LNG. Firms from around the world have invested over $140 billion in six new LNG plants over the last two and a half years, however it looks as though the future may rely on floating LNG plants rather than traditional onshore facilities, especially as this decision by Woodside may likely end all investor interest in onshore gas projects.

Related article: Australia Looks to Raise LNG Production by Nearly 30 Percent
   
JP Morgan estimates that a floating LNG project, similar to Shell’s floating LNG barge off the west coast of Australia, will help Woodside save 20%, reducing capital expenditure from around $44.6 billion for an onshore project, to $35.5 billion.

Woodside has also started to show more interest in North America, enquiring about the possibility of an LNG project in Canada.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News