• 4 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 7 minutes Did Trump start the oil price war?
  • 11 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 15 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 18 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 1 hour Russia's Rosneft Oil Company announces termination of its activity in Venezuela
  • 32 mins Trump eyes massive expulsion of suspected Chinese spies
  • 3 hours >>The falling of the Persian Gulf oil empires is near <<
  • 29 mins KSA taking Missiles from ?
  • 1 hour How to Create a Pandemic
  • 4 hours A New Solar-Panel Plant Could Have Capacity to Meet Half of Global Demand
  • 57 mins There are 4 major mfg of hydroxychloroquine in the world. China, Germany, India and Israel. Germany and India are hoarding production and blocked exports to the United States. China not shipping any , don't know their policy.
  • 14 hours Where's the storage?
  • 4 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 10 hours America’s Corona Tsar, Andrew Fauci, Concedes Covid-19 May Be Just a Bad Flu With a Fatality Rate of 0.1%
  • 15 hours Western Canadian Select selling for $6.48 bbl. Enbridge charges between $7 to $9 bbl to ship to the GOM refineries.
  • 3 hours Dr. Fauci is over rated.
  • 6 hours Saudi Arabia Can't Endure $30 Oil For Long

Will Small Modular Reactors Make Nuclear Power More Attractive to Investors?

Will Small Modular Reactors Make Nuclear Power More Attractive to Investors?

Large, modern nuclear reactors can produce more than 1,000 megawatts worth of power, but cost around $7 billion to build. They must also pass vast amounts of safety procedures and certifications, especially after the Fukushima disaster last year.

Babcock & Wilcox, a one-time builder of large pressurized water reactors as well as smaller ones suitable for the submarines, have suggested that reducing the size and capacity of nuclear reactors, to about 180 megawatts, could improve safety and reduce the cost. The reactors would be produced in a modular fashion, with all parts being assembled in a factory and then shipped to the required sites. B&W believe that the major hurdle facing the nuclear industry is the huge expense, and therefore financial risk, of constructing a reactor; an expense that would take years to earn back.

The Department of Energy (DoE) has made $450 million available to fund the engineering and licenses of these small modular reactors with the aim of creating and linking the modular reactors to the grid by 2022.

The US government still pursues traditional large reactors. Energy Secretary Steven Chu said that, “the Obama Administration and the Energy Department are committed to an all-of-the-above energy strategy that develops every source of American energy, including nuclear power. The Energy Department and private industry are working to position America as the leader in advanced nuclear energy technology and manufacturing.”

B&W’s have said that their modular reactor will be 25 meters tall by 4 meters wide because they “wanted to be able to put it on a rail car” for transport. It will be virtually completely self-contained in order to increase the safety, and designed to be buried underground to act as protection “from external events like tornadoes, hurricanes or tsunamis.”

However, the B&W reactor is not the only example of this technology being developed. Companies such as: Westinghouse Electric, NuScale, and Holtec are also researching the small modular reactors. Aris Candris, CEO of Westinghouse, said that, “the advantage of the smaller one (nuclear reactor) is: even if you need 1000 megawatts you can put investment in piecemeal and generate money while the next unit is put in.” Although as Fukushima showed the world, having several reactors linked together can cause a crisis, as a problem with one can cause a chain reaction.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • Mel Tisdale on April 05 2012 said:
    A very good idea which would be made even better if they used thorium as the nuclear fuel. It is far more abundant than uranium and of no use in making nuclear weapons, which would make them exportable. Also, thorium reactors do not need any elaborate safety mechanisms. If there is a problem, they automatically shuts themselves down, so they do not even need on-site staff. They do not use high pressure water so do not need large containment vessels and large supplies of water, so can be located almost anywhere. Need I say more?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News