• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 1 day Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Big Oil Refuses To Give Up On The Barents Sea

Big Oil Refuses To Give Up On The Barents Sea

Despite failures in the Barents…

World Class Copper Auction Draws Major Interest

World Class Copper Auction Draws Major Interest

Peru’s mega Michiquillay copper is…

Will EPA’s New Power Plant Emission Regulations be the End of Coal?

Will EPA’s New Power Plant Emission Regulations be the End of Coal?

After years of discussions and debates the US government has finally released its plans to regulate power plant emissions, the country’s largest source of greenhouse gases. In the US, the power sector produces about a third of all greenhouse gas emissions but it is completely unregulated. In June, President Obama announced that he would introduce new regulation to control the pollution created by power plants.

On Friday, the Environmental Protection Agency released its new Carbon Pollution Standard for Power Plants. MNN has highlighted four points that arise from the new regulations:

1. Fossil-Fuel plants will emit less CO2, but they will still produce CO2.

Related article: Endgame? New EPA Regulations Threaten U.S. Coal Industry

At the moment the average coal-fired power plant in the US releases nearly 1,800 pounds of CO2 per Megawatt hour (MWh), but under the EPA’s new laws coal power plants will not be allowed to emit more than 1,100 pounds of CO2 per MWh.

Whilst mostly aimed at coal power plants, due to them being the most highly polluting form of energy generation, the new rules will also apply to new natural gas plants. Large natural gas plants which produce more than 850MW must produce less than 1,000 pounds of CO2 per MWh, and smaller gas plants will be limited to 1,100 pounds per MWh. This in truth should not be too hard for the US’s natural gas power plants as the average currently releases 800 to 850 pounds of CO2 per MWh.

2. The natural gas industry will likely benefit greatly from these new regulations.

Coal plant operators would have to implement costly technology, such as carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology, which the EPA believes could reduce CO2 emissions by 90%, in order to meet the new emissions limits. The huge costs would increase the attractiveness of burning cleaner, cheaper natural gas as opposed to coal.

3. Coal-fired energy production will finally reflect its true cost to the environment.

Burning coal is a very cheap way for energy companies to produce electricity, yet its cost to the environment is actually very high. These new regulations should force the cost of coal up so that it more closely represents its real cost to the world. Unfortunately many energy companies have threatened to pass the increased cost onto customers in the form of higher electricity rates, but the overall affect should still be that coal becomes less popular due to its higher cost.

Related article: The World’s Best-Positioned Junior Coal Play?

4. Don’t expect anything soon.

This announcement was only an outline of the regulations that will be introduced. We have now entered a period of 60 days in which the public can put forward comments about the laws, and which will end with a public hearing. Once this has been passed, the regulations will begin, the finalization process, which will stretch into 2014.

US Coal Plants

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Nick Schroeder, PE on May 31 2014 said:
    My back of the envelope calc shows typical CCPPs emitting about 600 pounds/MWh, simple cycles about 1,000 pounds/MWh & typical coal fireds about 2,200 pounds/MWh. Those figures depend a lot on the coal and the plant specifics. CCPPs will make more money selling CO2 credits than making MWhs. NG produces about twice the water vapor/MMBtu as coal. Isn't water vapor a GHG?
  • Michael on May 29 2014 said:
    It will have very little impact on new plants because right now nobody is building new coal-fired power plants due to the low price of natural gas.
    It will increase the incentive to expand fracking and will drive the price of natural gas up while depressing the price of coal which will increase the incentive for utilities to run their existing coal-fired plants more and their gas-fired plants less... Creating the opposite effect of what the rule intends to do.
  • Evan on November 10 2013 said:
    I think it is also worth mentioning that the proposed rules will only apply to new power plants. While this does kick in a mandatory requirement to regulate existing power plants under the Clean Air Act, it will be even longer until existing sources are regulated. On the bright side, this means more time to research and reduce the cost of CCS. However, it also means the US is likely still years away from meaningful emission reductions in the electricity production sector.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News