• 6 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 10 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 15 minutes Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 6 hours Judge Approves SEC Settlement With Tesla, Musk
  • 4 mins U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 6 mins How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 12 mins UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 3 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 25 mins China Thirsty for Canadian Crude
  • 5 hours Porsche Says That it ‘Enters the Electric Era With The New Taycan’
  • 3 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 7 hours Saudi Crown Prince to Trump: We've Replaced All Iran's Lost Oil
  • 7 hours Mexico State Oil
  • 5 hours Gold price on a rise...
  • 2 hours Two Koreas: U.N. Command Wrap Up First Talks On Disarming Border
  • 53 mins Shell, partners approve huge $31 billion LNG Canada project. How long till Canadian Federal government Environmentalates it into the ground?
Move Aside Lithium – Vanadium Is The New Super-Metal

Move Aside Lithium – Vanadium Is The New Super-Metal

Lithium took investors across the…

Are Natural Gas Prices Set To Spike?

Are Natural Gas Prices Set To Spike?

Natural gas inventories have plunged…

Wary of Iraq Repeat, Support is Lacking for Action against Syria

What a difference 24 hours can make! Only yesterday it seemed that war, or some form of US-led armed attack, against Syria seemed more a case of ‘when’ and not ‘if’, and yet now, the threat of that imminent attack has faded.

This is because the British Prime Minister David Cameron, a close ally of the US, failed to win support in parliament for any military strike against Syria. Ministers still remain very wary of the poor decision to start a war in Iraq, and feel that this situation in Syria has a similar feel.

Even with the help of an assessment of the 21st of August chemical attack outside Damascus which stated it was highly likely that the Syrian government was behind the attack, opposition forced Cameron to agree to wait for the judgement of United Nations inspectors at the site, before making any decisions.

Related article: How to Trade the Ongoing Events in Syria

Politicians are worried that a decision to invade Syria, could end up very similar to Iraq, where the UK agreed to lend military support to the US-led invasion based on false information about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

Cameron argued that “this is not like Iraq. What we are seeing in Syria is fundamentally different. We’re not invading a country.”

Three US officials spoke to Bloomberg, and admitted that intelligence officers had intercepted Syrian communications, which had provided no evidence that Assad or any member of his inner circle knew of, or ordered the attack; in fact Assad made demands to his subordinates to explain what had happened.

Now it is possible that Assad has merely fabricated these messages in an attempt to deceive any intelligence officers who might intercept the communications, although the use of chemical weapons at this time makes no political or military sense as Assad was already gaining the upper hand in that region.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon has said that the UN inspectors will inspect the site of the chemical attack, and then report their findings to him. The result will play a huge part in deciding the action to take against Syria.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News