• 4 minutes Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 9 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 17 minutes Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 19 hours Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 3 hours Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 4 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 14 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 2 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 8 hours Corruption On The Top: Netanyahu's Wife Charged With Misuse of Public Funds for Meals
  • 14 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 3 hours Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 14 hours OPEC Meeting Could End Without Decision - Irony Note Added from OPEC Children's Book
  • 19 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 10 hours U.S. Withdraws From U.N. Human Rights Council
  • 12 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 13 hours "The Gasoline Car Is a Car With a Future"
  • 1 day EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 7 hours EU Confirms Trade Retaliation Measures vs. U.S. To Take Effect on June 22
  • 13 hours Sell out now or hold on?
Rig Count Falters Amid Oil Price Correction

Rig Count Falters Amid Oil Price Correction

The rig count slipped on…

Oil Markets Turn Bearish Ahead Of OPEC Meeting

Oil Markets Turn Bearish Ahead Of OPEC Meeting

Oil prices fell on Tuesday…

University of Cincinnati Retracts Fracking Study

Fracking employees

The University of Cincinnati has retracted a study on pollution caused by hydraulic fracturing or fracking, according to Energy in Depth (EID).

The researchers for “Impact of Extraction on PAH Levels in Ambient Air” pulled the study, which showed no contamination from hydraulic fracturing, citing a mistake in their concentration calculations.

Of note, participants in the study were recruited from the group Carroll County Concerned Citizens, an anti-fracking group.

The article in question was published in March of last year and the retraction was issued on June 29th, 2016.

EID claims that Dr. Erin Hayes, who was a co-author of the article, has been a participant in anti-fracking events. EID also asserts that the authors of the study admitted that their sample sizes were too small, and that the “chief assumption used for their research model was “totally impractical.”

According to EID, among other problems, included the fact that the researchers did not use random testing and did not consider other pollution sources beyond oil and gas. EID states that in cancer hazard assessments, researchers “assumed the worst.” The study looked at levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon or PAH.

EID says that one land owner in Carroll County Ohio, which was the focus area of the study, told EID that the some of the highest concentrations of PAH were found on his property, which is located approximately ten miles from the closest gas shale well. That, says EID, stands in direct conflict with the study’s assertion that PAH levels were in correlation with the proximity of shale gas activity.

In an interview with the Daily Caller News Foundation, Jackie Stewart, who is the Ohio director for EID stated: “Scientific studies by universities should be just that – scientific and without bias, especially when using taxpayer dollars to conduct the research. It’s interesting that researchers at the University of Cincinnati couldn’t wait to publish their now retracted and erroneous data on fracking and air pollution, yet they continue to delay publishing the results of their groundwater study, which showed no water contamination from fracking. This certainly raises a lot of questions.”

Lincoln Brown for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Icepilot on July 11 2016 said:
    Gregory Foreman - It's far more than vanity, it's money & careers.
  • Gregory Foreman on July 10 2016 said:
    Such “vanity research” is rampant among academia. Supposed unbiased researchers, start off from the point of “OK, this is what I want, this is what I’ll say-to hell with the facts- I’ll through in some facts and figures to make it look and sound authoritative”. Unfortunately, the average reader of such “chicken little” research fail to question the “results” of the study accepting the findings based on the veracity of the researchers. It is the ultimate example of the “the ends justify the means”. It is an unmitigated shame fines and penalties could not be assessed for employing such an approach.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News