• 3 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 7 minutes Saudi and UAE pressure to get US support for Oil quotas is reportedly on..
  • 11 minutes China devalues currency to lower prices to address new tariffs. But doesn't help. Here is why. . . .
  • 15 minutes What is your current outlook as a day trader for WTI
  • 2 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 5 hours In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 3 hours Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 8 hours Gretta Thunbergs zero carbon voyage carbon foot print of carbon fibre manufacture
  • 8 hours Continental Resource's Hamm (Trump Buddy) wants shale to cut production.Can't compete with peers. Stock will drop in half again.
  • 20 hours US Petroleum Demand Strongest Since 2007
  • 21 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 20 hours Movie Script: Epstein Guards Suspected Of Falsifying Logs
  • 9 hours Strait Of Hormuz As a Breakpoint: Germany Not Taking Part In U.S. Naval Mission
  • 3 hours Significant: Boeing Delays Delivery Of Ultra-Long-Range Version Of 777X
  • 3 hours Why Oil is Falling (including conspiracy theories and other fun stuff)
  • 4 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel

Trump Advisor Kudlow Deals Blow To EV Subsidies

EV charging

Larry Kudlow, chief economic adviser at the White House, has called for an end to electric vehicle subsidies and government help for renewable energy projects, Reuters reports, citing a statement from Kudlow.

“As a matter of our policy, we want to end all of those subsidies,” Kudlow said. “And by the way, other subsidies that were imposed during the Obama administration, we are ending, whether it’s for renewables and so forth. It’s just all going to end in the near future. I don’t know whether it will end in 2020 or 2021.”

At the moment, buyers of electric vehicles are entitled to a tax credit in the range of US$2,500 to US$7,500. But this incentive is limited: it is applicable until sales reach 200,000 vehicles per manufacturer. After this number is reached, the subsidies start to decline gradually.

Tesla is unsurprisingly the only company that has already hit the 200,000-vehicle target, announcing earlier this year that it had met this threshold. Other carmakers have yet to sell 200,000 plug-ins, and they may even have another few years before this happens.

Reuters notes how president Trump threatened GM to cut its EV subsidies after the carmaker said it plans to close five factories in the United States and lay off more than 14,000 people citing higher costs and a shift in focus to trucks and electric vehicles. Trump also threatened to raise car tariffs in retaliation.

Kudlow, however, said there is hardly any way to punish an individual carmaker in this manner. “I think legally you just can’t,” he said.

It also remains doubtful how the administration would enforce the removal of subsidies since it is the prerogative of Congress to introduce them, which it did, and to remove them. With the Democrats winning a majority in the House in November, the doubts around the White House’s plan for a subsidy removal grow. Many legislators have been pushing fore more incentives rather than fewer.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • EdBCN on December 04 2018 said:
    You can hardly call it 'a blow' as the administration has no power to do anything to the subsidies.
  • sandbun on December 04 2018 said:
    Also worth pointing out that this past month GM probably also passed the 200,000 mark. So ending this, which suddenly appeared on Trump's radar to hurt GM, makes the opposite of sense. Killing a subsidy that only Tesla and GM aren't able to benefit helps GM. But you know, logic and Trump have never really gone together.
  • JBG on December 04 2018 said:
    Take the subsidies away because I'm not going to stop buying electric cars. They are simply better for many people (not to mention the environment) than gas vehicles. I can get through my day on just electric miles and the increase to the monthly electric bill doesn't outweigh what I'd pay at the pump at least twice a month. This administration can choke on its fossil fuel advocacy because I literally ain't buying it.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play