• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 14 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 18 minutes California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 49 mins Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 2 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 8 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 4 mins Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 2 hours Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 6 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 7 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 15 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 6 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 17 hours Merkel, Putin to discuss Syria, Ukraine, Nord Stream 2
  • 14 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 19 hours Saudi Production Cut or Demand Drop?
  • 13 hours Saudi Aramco IPO Seems Unlikely
Oil Prices Hit 7-Week Low As Trade War Heats Up

Oil Prices Hit 7-Week Low As Trade War Heats Up

Oil prices traded close to…

Why Saudi Arabia Cut July Oil Production

Why Saudi Arabia Cut July Oil Production

Saudi Arabia’s oil production in…

These Oilfield Service Giants Are Feeling The Squeeze

The 19-month-old dive in the price of oil has left few options for oilfield services companies, which provide energy companies with the nuts and bolts they need to be productive.

The choice for companies such as the Houston-based giants Schlumberger and Halliburton is stark: Either refuse to offer customers further discounts on expertise and equipment, which could lose them critical business, or offer even greater discounts and lose revenue.

The average global price of oil has plunged from more than $110 per barrel in the summer of 2014 to around $30 per barrel today, a decline of more than 60 percent. Fully 15 percent of that loss has occurred in this first month of 2016.

That means dramatically lower revenues for oil and gas companies, which nevertheless want to continue exploring for energy and producing it even as they cut capital expenditures, or capex. Oilfield services companies have responded by offering these clients discounts sometimes exceeding 30 percent for onshore operations such as hydraulic fracturing and up to 50 percent for offshore operations.

Related: Russian-OPEC Production Cut Remains A Long Shot

This naturally has led service companies such as Schlumberger Ltd., the world’s largest, and the Halliburton Corp., both based in Houston, to make their own spending cuts, which are perhaps best illustrated in personnel layoffs.

Schlumberger said Jan. 21 that it cut 10,000 jobs in the fourth quarter of 2015. Company spokesman Joao Felix said total job cuts for the company since the third quarter of 2014 now total 34,000, or 26 percent of the company’s work force before the cuts began.

Meanwhile, in October, Halliburton said it had cut 18,000 jobs from its own work force in 2015, and on Jan. 25 it announced 4,000 more layoffs.

Related: Confusion On Saudi Proposed Production Cut See Oil Prices Spike

Both companies disclosed the latest layoffs in their announcements on their performance records during the fourth quarter of 2015. Schlumberger reported a net loss of just over $1 billion in the period, compared with a net income of $302 million in the same period of 2014. Halliburton reported a net loss of $28 million, a reversal of its net income of $901 million in the fourth quarter of 2014.

To help rectify matters, Schlumberger plans a $10 billion stock buyback program, a move applauded by some analysts. “It’s always nice to know the company is investing in itself,” Matt Marietta, a Houston-based analyst at the investment bank Stephens Inc., told Bloomberg. “All things considered, I think their cost-savings program can be viewed positively.”

Related: Rumors of OPEC-Russia Coordination Send Oil Prices Surging

Halliburton, meanwhile, is hoping regulators approve its bid to buy a smaller rival, Baker Hughes, for $35 billion in an effort to expand its operations and cut costs further by eliminating redundancies in the combined company. But that deal has been delayed by questions from both U.S. and European regulators.

Given the bind faced by oilfield services companies, they may simply have to end their current practice of ever-greater discounts to their customers and hope that the resulting drop in energy exploration and production could lead to a more equitable alignment of supply with demand.

That is how OPEC sees it. In its Monthly Oil Market Report issued Jan. 18, it said its strategy of driving prices down could “rebalance” the oil markets and restore oil prices to more realistic levels. It said that “2016 is set to see output decline as the effects of deep capex cuts [by non-OPEC producers] start to feed through.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News