• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 4 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 3 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 39 mins Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 3 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 4 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 20 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 13 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 24 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 1 day Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 1 day WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 24 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 1 day California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 1 day Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
The Real Leader In Global Energy Production

The Real Leader In Global Energy Production

Last week President Trump was…

Significant Capex Cut ExxonMobil Takes Its Toll On U.S. GDP

And the CapEx hits just keep on coming.

Two weeks after Goldman reported something troubling, namely that there is a massive gap of nearly 20% between the sellside CapEx estimate for what US oil companies will spend on CapEx and what implied guidance suggests as shown in the table below...

(Click to enlarge)

... Rex Tillerson, the CEO of world's formerly biggest by market cap company, Exxon, confirmed that the great CapEx drought of 2016 will be a definite reality, one which will subtract billions from U.S. 2016 GDP in the form of fixed investment, also known as Capital Expenditures, when it announced that it now expected full year 2016 CapEx to decline by 25% from 2015 to just $23 billion.

To be sure, Tillerson tried to spin the attempt to preserve some $7 billion in cash in a positive light:

"We remain steadfast in our mission to create superior long-term shareholder value,” Tillerson said at the company’s annual analyst meeting at the New York Stock Exchange. “We have the financial flexibility to pursue attractive opportunities and can adjust our investment program based on market demand fundamentals.”

The confirmation:

ExxonMobil anticipates capital spending of $23 billion in 2016, down 25 percent from 2015. The company continues to selectively advance its investment portfolio, building upon attractive longer-term opportunities.

“We are focused on maximizing benefits across the energy value chain,” Tillerson said. The company captures unique value from its diverse, high-quality resource base from exploration, development and production all the way through to the fuels, lubricants and petrochemical products used by consumers.

Among the other noted highlights, is that "ExxonMobil generated $33 billion of cash flow from operations and asset sales and $6.5 billion of free cash flow in 2015." Of course, the company wants to keep generating billions in cash, hence the need for dramatic CapEx cuts.

Which brings us to the one point which Goldman made in mid-February, looking at the odd discrepancy between plunging CapEx and barely declining oil production, bringing up the question just how much more CapEx can the majors cut without suffering material oil production, and thus revenue, hits?

We will find out soon, but not before the U.S. economy is hit with the double whammy of hundreds of thousands of well-paid and now laid off energy workers contributing nothing to consumption, and the ongoing collapse in CapEx by virtually every energy company, a drop which according to some will subtract up to $100 billion in fixed investment from US 2016 GDP.

We wonder how many seasonal adjustments the US BEA will need to cover up that latest recessionary indicator.

By Zerohedge



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • mm on March 02 2016 said:
    ZH is a stupid blog. ALWAYS pessimistic and for example if Capex was up they would be spinning it as overspending. ZH is a great contrary tool.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News