• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 3 hours One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 8 hours Once Upon A Time... North Korea Abruptly Withdraws Staff From Liaison Office
  • 8 hours Chile Tests Floating Solar Farm
  • 6 hours Oil Slips Further From 2019 Highs On Trade Worries
  • 2 hours Modular Nuclear Reactors
  • 14 hours Poll: Will Renewables Save the World?
  • 23 hours China's E-Buses Killing Diesel Demand
  • 24 hours Trump sells out his base to please Wallstreet and Oil industry
  • 19 hours China's Expansion: Italy Leads Europe Into China’s Embrace
  • 1 day Russian Effect: U.S. May Soon Pause Preparations For Delivering F-35s To Turkey
  • 1 day Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 12 hours US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 18 hours New Rebate For EVs in Canada
  • 1 day Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
Capping The Oil Price Rally

Capping The Oil Price Rally

OPEC’s recent meeting in Baku…

Cloud Peak On Brink Of Collapse After Bad Coal Bet

Cloud Peak On Brink Of Collapse After Bad Coal Bet

The U.S. power sector’s pivot…

Sierra Club Files Suit Against New Construction of Bakken Pipeline

Bakken pipeline

The Iowa branch of the Sierra Club has filed a lawsuit against the state’s Utilities Board (IUB) and Dakota Access LCC in an effort to block the construction of a pipeline that would connect North Dakota’s energy resources to the southern half of the United States.

Wally Taylor, a lawyer for the nationwide environmental action and lobbying group, filed the petition on May 26th. The case, officially created on Tuesday, says the Bakken pipeline’s approval requires judicial review.

Work on the project is set to begin shortly, according to a report by the local news source Quad-City Times, which cited a draft order by the IUB regarding portions of the soon-to-be-lengthened pipeline that do not fall under federal control.

Related: Why the Oil Majors Face Inevitable Decline

The contents of the draft would allow construction to begin only in places in which the company has secured relevant permits and permissions, the report said, pointing out that the specified areas include a “bulk” of the Bakken’s Iowan trail.

The three-member board said the order fulfills the next step in the pipeline construction process, after the entity granted Dakota Access a permit to build it on March 10th and gave the corporation the authorization to use imminent domain to seize farmland for the $3.8 billion project.

“I think following that, we would be in the same realm to say they could begin construction in areas of which they have all necessary approvals, permits and easements,” Nick Wagner, an IUB board member, confirmed.

Related: Why We Need $120 Oil

Lawyer David Lynch, who represents the board, has been charged with preparing the draft order. It should be ready by the end of the week, he says, after which the IUB could approve or suggest amendments to the document.

The company, a subsidiary of Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, says it has acquired the approval of 96 percent of the property owners whose land would host the 1,168-mile pipeline.

The Army Corps of Engineers is one of the last groups that has not officially authorized the company to use its land.

Claims by the Upper Sioux tribe that land set aside for the Illinois-bound pipeline contained a tribal burial ground with human remains prompted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to revoke the permissions it had given Dakota Access to build one segment of the project.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News