• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 6 hours Here's your favourite girl, Tom!
  • 8 hours China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 24 mins Peaceful demonstration in Hong Kong again thwarted by brutality of police
  • 8 hours Brexit agreement
  • 12 hours Australian Hydroelectric Plant Cost Overruns
  • 1 day The Ultimate Heresy: Technology Can't Fix What's Broken
  • 36 mins ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 15 hours IMO 2020:
  • 16 hours Yesterday Angela Merkel stopped Trump technology war on China – the moral of the story is do not eavesdrop on ladies with high ethical standards
  • 3 hours Nigeria Demands $62B from Oil Majors
  • 8 hours 5 Tweets That Change The World?
  • 7 hours Bloomberg: shale slowing. Third wave of shale coming.
  • 10 hours The Problem Is The Economy, Not The Climate
The Cheapest Oil Ever Sold

The Cheapest Oil Ever Sold

If history tells us anything,…

A Draconian Crackdown Looms Over Natural Gas

A Draconian Crackdown Looms Over Natural Gas

Natural Gas is coming up…

Shell Quits U.S. Refining Lobby Group Over Climate Policy Discord

Shell truck

Royal Dutch Shell said on Tuesday that it would be leaving the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) group because of ‘material misalignment’ in climate-related positions—the first major oil and gas group to quit the refining lobby over climate policy disagreements.

In its Industry Associations Climate Review published on Tuesday, Shell said that it had reviewed its memberships of industry associations in light of Shell’s climate-related policy positions. Of the 19 associations it reviewed, Shell found that “there was material misalignment with one industry association, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM).”

“We have decided not to renew our membership of AFPM in 2020,” the oil major said.

Shell’s reasons for quitting AFPM include the association not having stated support for the Paris Agreement, which Shell supports, as well as AFPM’s position that doesn’t support carbon pricing.

“Shell has supported carbon pricing initiatives at the state and federal level, such as the California cap-and-trade programme,” the supermajor said.

Shell investor, The Church of England Pensions Board, welcomed the oil and gas group’s decision to leave AFPM.

“This is an industry first. With this review Shell have set the benchmark for best practice on corporate climate lobbying not just within the Oil and Gas but across all industries. The challenge now is for others to follow suit,” said Adam Matthews, Director of Ethics and Engagement for the Church of England Pensions Board.

Shell was one of the first supermajors to start setting climate goals amid increased investor pressure for transparency.

Last month, Shell announced its first-ever short-term goals to cut the carbon footprint of its operations and product sales as the oil and gas industry is under intense investor and shareholder pressure to address climate change.

In December last year, in an industry first, Shell said that it plans to set short-term targets for reducing the net carbon footprint of the energy products it sells, and to link those targets with executive remuneration.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play