• 5 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 8 minutes Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 11 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 16 minutes Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 32 mins *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 20 hours U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Weighs Lifting Tariffs On China
  • 12 hours Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 11 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 10 hours Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 6 hours Connection Between Climate Rules And German's No-Limit Autobahns? Strange, But It Exists
  • 2 hours Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 19 hours UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 12 hours Conspiracy - Theory versus Reality
  • 1 day What will Saudi Arabia say? Booming Qatar-Turkey Trade To Hit $2 bn For 2018
  • 19 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 1 day German Carmakers Warning: Hard Brexit Would Be "Fatal"
Global Intelligence Report - 16th January 2019

Global Intelligence Report - 16th January 2019

Plagued by U.S. oil sanctions,…

Shell Quits Oil Terminal In Washington

Shell tank truck

Shell has given up its plan to build an oil train unloading terminal near Anacortes, Washington, that would have received 60,000 barrels of crude daily produced in the Bakken shale of North Dakota. The facility would have been an expansion to Shell’s March Point refinery.

According to the company, the project is no longer economical, not least because of the price of Bakken oil, as the refinery’s general manager Shirley Yap said in a statement. But there has also been vocal opposition to the plan from environmental groups and Native American tribes. According to them, it’s this opposition that made Shell change its mind.

Transportation of oil by rail is a sensitive issue, as statistically it has been shown to be more risky than pipelines, and even this method of oil transport is getting more than enough heat from environmentalist groups. Things got more targeted earlier this year, after a 15-car oil train carrying crude for Union Pacific went off the tracks in the Columbia River Gorge, and four cars caught fire.

Shell’s Washington refinery will continue to receive oil via pipeline from Canada and by tankers from Alaska.

Meanwhile, the company is working on exiting its North Sea operations, which, according to UBS, could generate around US$1 billion. The asset sale plan is part of Shell’s efforts to reduce the debt pile accumulated after the US$52-billion takeover of gas major BG Group. At end-June 2016, Shell’s total debt stood at US$79.47 billion, according to its second-quarter financial report..

UBS analysts also suggested that Shell might not stop at partial divestment: “There is of course room to be even more radical, potentially exiting very significant pieces of business that have hitherto been regarded as core to the business,” they said. Shell plans to divest assets worth US$30 billion between this year and 2018.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Randy Verret on October 07 2016 said:
    Shells announcement stated it was an economic decision. To the contrary, just saw a predictable announcement from the Sierra Club claiming victory over dirty fossil fuels (again) on the righteous path to 100% renewables. Great. Take a victory lap for good measure! Only problem is, if we keep cutting off all infrastructure projects to transport petroleum (rail & especially pipeline), sooner or later the market will speak. As in HIGHER consumer prices for fuel and potential shortages & supply disruptions. Of course, when all that happens a little further down the road, folks like the Sierra Club won't be around to answer for it.

    History tends to repeat itself. As such, I find it ironic (today) that a Category 3 hurricane is lashing the Florida coast. Eleven years ago, Katrina slammed into the Mississippi coast & flooded New Orleans. Everyone remembers that tragedy, correct? MOST of the blame for the failure of the levee system which created the havoc in NOLA was laid at the feet of the US Army Corps of Engineers. What most people don't know is that the project to upgrade that levee system was halted by an environmental lawsuit circa 1975+/-. Guess who that plaintiff was? It was the Sierra Club! Funny, I NEVER heard them mentioned when the media was looking for a "scalp" with the levee failure. Most likely, they will get another "hall pass" on the coming infrastructure CRUNCH unless the public WAKES UP and starts looking at the big picture. Complex trade-offs and consequences for choices made. Well consequences for the majority of us mortals, unless you are named the Sierra Club...

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News