• 3 minutes UAE says four vessels subjected to 'sabotage' near Fujairah port
  • 6 minutes Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 8 minutes OPEC is no longer an Apex Predator
  • 12 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 52 mins Canada's Uncivil Oil War : 78% of Voters Cite *Energy* as the Top Issue
  • 2 hours California Threatens Ban on ICE Cars
  • 3 hours Did Saudi Arabia pull a "Jussie Smollett" and fake an attack on themselves to justify indiscriminate bombing on Yemen city population ?
  • 2 hours China Downplays Chances For Trade Talks While U.S. Plays ‘Little Tricks’
  • 3 hours "We cannot be relying on fossil fuels to burn as an energy source at all in our country" - Canadian NDP Political Leader
  • 1 day Solar Industry Lays Claim To The 2020s; Kicks Off The Solar+ Decade
  • 17 mins Australia Sky News Election Summary: "This was the Climate Change Cult Election, and the Climate Change Cult Lost"
  • 2 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 22 hours Shell ‘to have commercial wind farms’ by early 2020s
  • 6 hours Global Warming Making The Rich Richer
  • 7 days How can Trump 'own' a trade war?
  • 7 days China, U.S. Hold 'Productive' Trade Talks In Beijing
  • 2 hours Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
Canada’s Pipeline Crisis Isn’t All Bad For Investors

Canada’s Pipeline Crisis Isn’t All Bad For Investors

Canadian drillers that find themselves…

San Bruno Penalty could Force PG&E into Bankruptcy

In July the California Public Utilities Commission changed a previous decision to allow Pacific Gas & Electric to pay their $2.25 billion fine for the natural gas explosion in San Bruno in the form of energy infrastructure improvements, to one that would require at least $300 million be paid in the form of a one off fine to the state.

Tony Earley, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PG&E, warned that the $2.25 billion penalty, added to the money already spent on the clean-up and pipeline and safety upgrades, would increase the total paid by PG&E for the accident to nearly $4 billion. He has asked the Californian regulators to credit the $2.25 billion against money already spent on the system upgrades, stating to Bloomberg that “if the purpose was to get the company’s attention, you have the company’s attention.”

The California regulators must now decide whether the 2010 explosion is worth the current penalty, which would likely send PG&E, one of the state’s largest utilities, into bankruptcy for the second time in 12 years if it cannot sell enough shares to raise the cash.

Related article: California Impose Record Fine against PG&E for 2010 Gas Explosion

Back in 2001 PG&E’s utility company entered bankruptcy after accruing $9 billion in debt when the deregulation of the state’s power market saw electricity costs triple, and regulators were not quick enough to raise customer prices, causing energy companies to sell electricity at a loss.

The utilities commission is expected to make its decision regarding the fate of the penalty, and therefore the fate of PG&E, before the end of the year.

Terrie Prosper, a spokeswoman for the commission, explained that “staff made a recommendation regarding a penalty and parties and PG&E provided comments. The matter is now in the hands of administrative law judges.”

Related article: Improving Shale Well Profits with Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

The California commission is trying to tackle a problem that the whole of the US faces; forcing utilities to make much needed infrastructural upgrades whilst at the same time keeping energy rates low. In the case of PG&E, the state commission is trying to get billions in system upgrades, and punish the utility, all whilst keeping the company healthy enough to survive, and continue to offer low rates. The US will need to spend an estimated $1.5 trillion in total to make the improvements necessary.

Earley explained that “we are at a real turning point that will determine whether the company will continue to make the progress we made or will it end up being a company that is just struggling along because we are financially hobbled.”

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News