• 4 minutes Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 9 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 17 minutes Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 2 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 18 hours Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 1 hour Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 12 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 6 hours Corruption On The Top: Netanyahu's Wife Charged With Misuse of Public Funds for Meals
  • 2 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 12 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 8 hours U.S. Withdraws From U.N. Human Rights Council
  • 2 hours Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 17 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 13 hours OPEC Meeting Could End Without Decision - Irony Note Added from OPEC Children's Book
  • 11 hours "The Gasoline Car Is a Car With a Future"
  • 10 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 23 hours EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 6 hours EU Confirms Trade Retaliation Measures vs. U.S. To Take Effect on June 22
  • 1 day Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

San Bruno Penalty could Force PG&E into Bankruptcy

In July the California Public Utilities Commission changed a previous decision to allow Pacific Gas & Electric to pay their $2.25 billion fine for the natural gas explosion in San Bruno in the form of energy infrastructure improvements, to one that would require at least $300 million be paid in the form of a one off fine to the state.

Tony Earley, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PG&E, warned that the $2.25 billion penalty, added to the money already spent on the clean-up and pipeline and safety upgrades, would increase the total paid by PG&E for the accident to nearly $4 billion. He has asked the Californian regulators to credit the $2.25 billion against money already spent on the system upgrades, stating to Bloomberg that “if the purpose was to get the company’s attention, you have the company’s attention.”

The California regulators must now decide whether the 2010 explosion is worth the current penalty, which would likely send PG&E, one of the state’s largest utilities, into bankruptcy for the second time in 12 years if it cannot sell enough shares to raise the cash.

Related article: California Impose Record Fine against PG&E for 2010 Gas Explosion

Back in 2001 PG&E’s utility company entered bankruptcy after accruing $9 billion in debt when the deregulation of the state’s power market saw electricity costs triple, and regulators were not quick enough to raise customer prices, causing energy companies to sell electricity at a loss.

The utilities commission is expected to make its decision regarding the fate of the penalty, and therefore the fate of PG&E, before the end of the year.

Terrie Prosper, a spokeswoman for the commission, explained that “staff made a recommendation regarding a penalty and parties and PG&E provided comments. The matter is now in the hands of administrative law judges.”

Related article: Improving Shale Well Profits with Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

The California commission is trying to tackle a problem that the whole of the US faces; forcing utilities to make much needed infrastructural upgrades whilst at the same time keeping energy rates low. In the case of PG&E, the state commission is trying to get billions in system upgrades, and punish the utility, all whilst keeping the company healthy enough to survive, and continue to offer low rates. The US will need to spend an estimated $1.5 trillion in total to make the improvements necessary.

Earley explained that “we are at a real turning point that will determine whether the company will continue to make the progress we made or will it end up being a company that is just struggling along because we are financially hobbled.”

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News