• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 7 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 7 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 7 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 7 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Tesla Execs Bail As Cash Flow Hits Record Lows

Tesla Execs Bail As Cash Flow Hits Record Lows

Amid a rough second quarter…

Oil Fundamentals Overturn Geopolitical Risk

Oil Fundamentals Overturn Geopolitical Risk

Geopolitical risk from Iraq and…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

San Bruno Penalty could Force PG&E into Bankruptcy

San Bruno Penalty could Force PG&E into Bankruptcy

In July the California Public Utilities Commission changed a previous decision to allow Pacific Gas & Electric to pay their $2.25 billion fine for the natural gas explosion in San Bruno in the form of energy infrastructure improvements, to one that would require at least $300 million be paid in the form of a one off fine to the state.

Tony Earley, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PG&E, warned that the $2.25 billion penalty, added to the money already spent on the clean-up and pipeline and safety upgrades, would increase the total paid by PG&E for the accident to nearly $4 billion. He has asked the Californian regulators to credit the $2.25 billion against money already spent on the system upgrades, stating to Bloomberg that “if the purpose was to get the company’s attention, you have the company’s attention.”

The California regulators must now decide whether the 2010 explosion is worth the current penalty, which would likely send PG&E, one of the state’s largest utilities, into bankruptcy for the second time in 12 years if it cannot sell enough shares to raise the cash.

Related article: California Impose Record Fine against PG&E for 2010 Gas Explosion

Back in 2001 PG&E’s utility company entered bankruptcy after accruing $9 billion in debt when the deregulation of the state’s power market saw electricity costs triple, and regulators were not quick enough to raise customer prices, causing energy companies to sell electricity at a loss.

The utilities commission is expected to make its decision regarding the fate of the penalty, and therefore the fate of PG&E, before the end of the year.

Terrie Prosper, a spokeswoman for the commission, explained that “staff made a recommendation regarding a penalty and parties and PG&E provided comments. The matter is now in the hands of administrative law judges.”

Related article: Improving Shale Well Profits with Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

The California commission is trying to tackle a problem that the whole of the US faces; forcing utilities to make much needed infrastructural upgrades whilst at the same time keeping energy rates low. In the case of PG&E, the state commission is trying to get billions in system upgrades, and punish the utility, all whilst keeping the company healthy enough to survive, and continue to offer low rates. The US will need to spend an estimated $1.5 trillion in total to make the improvements necessary.

Earley explained that “we are at a real turning point that will determine whether the company will continue to make the progress we made or will it end up being a company that is just struggling along because we are financially hobbled.”

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News