• 5 minutes Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 28 mins WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 7 hours Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 3 hours Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 1 min Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 4 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 6 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 7 hours Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 5 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 3 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 21 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 21 hours California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 10 hours Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
  • 10 hours Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
What Would A Hard Brexit Mean For British Oil?

What Would A Hard Brexit Mean For British Oil?

Despite nearly 14 months of…

Nord Stream 2 Clears Another Hurdle

Nord Stream 2 Clears Another Hurdle

Russia’s controversial Nord Stream 2…

Royal Navy Trains For LNG Tanker Bomb Attacks

Tanker

The British Royal Navy has been preparing to counteract a potential terrorist attack on LNG carriers for the last two years, a source from the Navy has told the Daily Mail. The source explained that two years ago, the navy prevented a terrorist group’s plans to attack LNG tankers coming into British terminals by planting limpet bombs on their hulls.

Since then, an elite diver squad has been inspecting LNG tanker hulls consistently.

LNG tankers are much safer than oil tankers. The liquefied methane is contained in non-pressurized tanks, and the danger of it igniting is small as it needs to vaporize and mix with the air in a specific proportion. This is not to say that there is no danger at all, however.

A bomb planted on the hull of a tanker could cause a fire, and LNG does burn. A surface fire as a result of LNG spillage could cause serious destruction even if there is no actual explosion. The loss of an LNG tanker in itself can become a serious economic problem, potentially creating energy shortage, the source also said.

LNG imports account for 17 percent of Britain’s total gas consumption. The bulk, or 45 percent, comes from local production in the North Sea and East Irish Sea, and the remainder flows via pipelines from continental Europe.

Related: Saudis May Enter The Shale Game

Britain has been eager to start importing U.S. LNG, but this has yet to come. Cheniere Energy’s first Europe-bound cargo left the Sabine Pass terminal this Sunday and is expected to reach its destination, the Gate terminal in Rotterdam, on June 7. The cargo was commissioned by Norway’s Statoil.

Traders who spoke to Platts said that the LNG from the U.S. was probably a replacement cargo for Statoil, because the Norwegian major’s LNG facility at Snohvit is shut for maintenance between May 12 and June 18, while Statoil has a delivery obligation to supply LNG to Gate.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News