• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 11 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 12 days By Kellen McGovern Jones - "BlackRock Behind New TX-LA Offshore Wind Farm"
  • 8 hours If hydrogen is the answer, you're asking the wrong question
  • 7 days Solid State Lithium Battery Bank
  • 6 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
What Are America’s Cheapest Energy Sources?

What Are America’s Cheapest Energy Sources?

Renewable energy sources, particularly onshore…

NIMBY: The Battle for Britain’s Clean Energy Future

NIMBY: The Battle for Britain’s Clean Energy Future

The UK government faces growing…

Republicans Support Bill to Cut Renewable Energy Spending by 50%

The latest Energy and Water appropriations bill, the fifth of its kind to be presented before the Appropriations Committee, has outraged Democrats, who have begun attacking Republicans about the proposed 50% cut to spending on renewable energy.

Ranking Member of the subcommittee Marcy Kaptur, said that “we must develop a more secure energy future for this country. This is not really forward looking development for our country.”

The cut would see the amount spent on renewable energy research and development reduce by $911 million, and a total cut of $2.81 billion less than the 2013 budget.

Nita Lowey, a Ranking Member of the full committee, stated that, “with global carbon emissions at record highs and extreme weather events caused by global warming happening with increased frequency and deadly force, I see no justification for such drastic cuts to investments in renewable energy that decrease our carbon footprint.”

Related article: Developing Countries Lead the Way in Renewable Energy Investment

The republicans have also written into the bill that the budget used to support energy technology start-ups via the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) program will be cut by 81%, considering the whole scheme to be too high risk and expensive. It is the program that invested in failures such as Solyndra, but also success stories such as Tesla.

Lowey believes that “our economy will be at a disadvantage to capitalize on the benefits of 21st century discoveries, ceding breakthroughs in areas like clean energy to China.

We are just beginning to see benefits from ARPA-E. This bill would effectively end that program.”

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News