• 4 minutes "Natural Gas Trading Picks Up Considerably Amid High Volatility" by Charles Kennedy - ...And is U.S. NatGas Futures dramatically overbought at the $6.35 range?
  • 8 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 12 minutes  What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?
  • 9 mins GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 3 days Revisiting: "The U.S. Grid Isn’t Ready For A Major Shift To Renewables" from March 2021 by Irina Slav at OILPRICE
  • 3 hours What China is Learning from Russia's War in Ukraine and its Consequences
  • 6 days How cheap Chinese tires might explain Russia's 'stalled' 40-mile-long military convoy in Ukraine
  • 6 hours Natural Gas is the Cleanest and most Likely Source of Energy to Fuel the World.
  • 2 days Failure To Implement Russian Oil Ban Could Send Oil Crashing To $65
Tin Supply Is Running Dangerously Low

Tin Supply Is Running Dangerously Low

The tin market is dangerously…

Poland Strikes $18 Billion Nuclear Power Deal With U.S.

The United States and Poland closed a nuclear power deal potentially worth $18 billion as the Central European country seeks to reduce its reliance on coal and Russian natural gas.

While the deal is not yet final, there is a pretty good chance that Warsaw will pick the U.S. over its main competitors on the international nuclear energy scene, namely China and Russia.

“We are hopeful that the ultimate decisions that are made by Poland ... over a period of time will result in them choosing U.S. technology,” Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette told reporters as quoted by Reuters.

Poland wants to build six nuclear reactors to supplement its gas imports. Currently, it imports a lot of gas from Russia, but given the less than friendly bilateral relations, it wants to cut these off, and soon, by 2022, Reuters notes. Instead, it would import pipeline gas by Norway and liquefied natural gas from, among others, the United States.

Yet Poland also relies heavily on coal-fired power plants, and this goes counter to the EU’s ambitions for a net-zero economy in 2050. The only way to reduce or even eliminate its coal use is to replace that cheap energy with another comparable generational capacity.

The agreement closed this week stipulates that over the next 18 months, the parties will develop a program for the construction of the reactors and how they will be financed. Per plans, the first reactors should come online in 2033. The whole program could end up costing Warsaw some $40 billion, of which at least $18 billion would go towards acquiring U.S. nuclear technology, according to a U.S. government official.

Poland’s government plans to build between 6 and 9 GW of nuclear capacity by 2040, but it will also invest in renewable energy, planning between 8 and 11 GW in offshore wind power capacity.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Van Snyder on October 26 2020 said:
    A fast-neutron reactor can consume all the actinides. The long-life isotopes in "nuclear waste" are unburned fuel. If you separate caesium and strontium from other fission products, you only need to store 92 kg/GWe-yr for 300 years. Half the remaining fission products are innocuous before thirty years, and the rest aren't even radioactive.

    Only a fast-neutron reactor can consume all the actinides.

    I hope they buy GE/Hitachi S-PRISM reactors and build a pyroelectric fuel processing system to close the nuclear fuel cycle. Read "Plentiful Energy" by Charles E. Till and Yoon Il Chang. The alternative is the Russian BN-800, which I think they won't want.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News