• 3 minutes Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 7 minutes Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 12 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 1 hour Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 3 hours Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 5 mins Tesla Closing a Dozen Solar Facilities in Nine States
  • 1 min Why is permian oil "locked in" when refineries abound?
  • 6 hours Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 5 hours EU Leaders Set To Prolong Russia Sanctions Again
  • 18 hours Teapots Cut U.S. Oil Shipments
  • 14 hours Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 9 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 2 hours Oil prices going down
  • 3 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 2 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 22 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 1 hour EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 19 hours Hot line, Macron: Phone Calls With Trump Are Like Sausages Best Not To Know What Is Inside
  • 6 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
U.S.-China Trade War Will Hurt Shale Drillers

U.S.-China Trade War Will Hurt Shale Drillers

The latest escalation in the…

Serving The 2 Billion Unbanked: A New Trillion Dollar Market

Serving The 2 Billion Unbanked: A New Trillion Dollar Market

Fintech, alongside blockchain, has been…

Panel Rejects Washington Oil Terminal

oil storage

A panel has rejected a project for the construction of an oil terminal at the port of Vancouver in the state of Washington on the grounds that the companies behind the project had failed to convince them that the site was acceptable.

The panel’s chairwoman told media the members of the Energy Facility Evaluation Council had gone through more than a quarter of a million public comments on the proposed terminal, including notable opponents to the project such as environmental groups, tribes, and municipalities from the area.

The project was conceived by Tesoro Corp. and Savage Cos. as a storage hub for oil transported by rail from North Dakota to the Washington coast, from where it will be loaded onto vessels that will take it to West Coast refineries. The facility was supposed to have a capacity of 360,000 bpd of crude.

The opponents of the project argued that all the benefits from the site will be reaped by California, and in the future by foreign markets, while all the risks will be reaped by local communities. Among these risks, according to an environmental study released last week, are spills, train accidents, and longer emergency response times caused by increased road traffic. Also, the study identified as risk potentially negative consequences for low-income communities and even the risk of an earthquake that could cause an oil spill in the port.

Related: U.S. Oil Has One Fatal Weakness

According to Tesoro and Savage, which set up a joint venture, Vancouver Energy, for the project, said they were extremely disappointed with the decision of the panel, with a spokesman saying that the panel "has set an impossible standard for new energy facilities based on the risk of incidents that the Final Environmental Impact Statement characterizes as extremely unlikely."

The final decision is in the hands of Governor Jay Inslee, and chances are against Vancouver Energy. This is the latest example of the major opposition new oil and gas infrastructure projects are running into on a regular basis in both the U.S. and Canada.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Bill Simpson on November 29 2017 said:
    Texas and Louisiana welcome oil and gas projects.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News