• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 8 mins Yesterday Angela Merkel stopped Trump technology war on China – the moral of the story is do not eavesdrop on ladies with high ethical standards
  • 3 hours China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 7 hours IMO 2020:
  • 9 hours World Stocks Drop And Futures Tread Water After China Reports Worst GDP Growth In 30 Years
  • 26 mins The Ultimate Heresy: Technology Can't Fix What's Broken
  • 3 hours Brexit agreement
  • 17 hours National Geographic Warns Billions Face Shortages Of Food And Clean Water Over Next 30 Years
  • 17 hours ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 14 hours Why did Aramco Delay IPO again ? It's Not Always What It Seems.
  • 10 hours Deepwater GOM Project Claims Industry First
  • 17 hours Idiotic Environmental Predictions
  • 17 hours Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Ukraine Oil & Gas exploration company Burisma, and 2020 U.S. election shenanigans
What’s Really Driving Oil Prices?

What’s Really Driving Oil Prices?

With all of the daily…

Trump’s Big Biofuel Package Has No Teeth

Trump’s Big Biofuel Package Has No Teeth

The Trump administration has just…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Oil Tankers Sunk Along U.S. Coastline in WWII Pose Environmental Threat

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has analysed 20,000 shipwrecks in US waters to determine the potential oil spill threat that they pose, and then presented their report to the Coast Guard.

Lisa Symons, the resources protection coordinator for NOAA’S Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, said that the “report is the most comprehensive assessment to date of the potential oil pollution threats from shipwrecks in U.S. waters. Now that we have analysed this data, the Coast Guard will be able to evaluate NOAA's recommendations and determine the most appropriate response to potential threats.”

It turns out that most of the 20,000 ships were either too small to worry about, ran on coal, not oil, or merely all the oil leaked out of them long ago.

However the study did find that 87 of the ships, 52 of those sunk during World War II (mostly by German U-boats), have the potential to spill tens of millions of gallons of crude oil in US waters. Although the government scientists involved in the research state that only six of the wrecks pose any serious threat to the environment, or local economies.

Related article: Fish Embryos Reveal that Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Still Lingers

17 of the more dangerous wrecks
17 of the more dangerous wrecks that NOAA surveyed, and into which it would like further investigation.

One of the biggest dangers is the oil tanker W.D. Anderson, which was sunk by two torpedoes as it sailed along the Florida coastline in February 1942, as it is feared to contain as much as 5.6 million gallons of crude oil in its tanks.

Symons said that even if those six spill just ten percent of their oil, it could easily cause a local-scale disaster, which while not being the worst spill ever on a national level, would certainly devastate local communities.

Related article: Exxon Oil Spill in Arkansas, Keystone Spoiler?

The report tries to play down the threat posed by these sunken ships, claiming that even if all 87 voided their entire cargo of oil, the resulting spill would be less than half the size of the 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico disaster which saw 200 million gallons leak into the sea.

Mmmmmm … that isn’t really the most comforting of thoughts, as even something approaching half the size of that environmental catastrophe would still be a devastating blow to marine habitats, and coastal cities and economies.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • josh bennett on September 25 2014 said:
    #best name ever lol....
    thanks it really helped me.

    josh
  • lallen2064 on May 23 2013 said:
    It makes me wonder, if there is there a way to extract the oil from these wrecks without triggering the environmental contamination that they fear?

    I would think that the amount of oil involved is so little (i.e. 5.6 million gallons) and the potential liability so high that no oil/salvage company would take on the challenge. Considering a liability point of view (EPA and private lawsuits), there is utterly no reason to get near those wrecks for any reason.

    Any company involved would definitely need government assurances to mitigate the liability and funding to offset the costs involved.
  • Billy on May 23 2013 said:
    How about harvesting the oil, solves the problem!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play