• 1 hour Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 4 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 6 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 12 hours Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 17 hours British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 21 hours Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 23 hours Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 24 hours Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 1 day OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 1 day London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 1 day Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 1 day India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 2 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 3 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 3 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 3 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 3 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 3 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 3 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 4 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 4 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 4 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 4 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 7 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 7 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 7 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 7 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 7 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 7 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
Is The Aramco IPO On The Brink Of Collapse?

Is The Aramco IPO On The Brink Of Collapse?

Conflicting news suggests that Saudi…

Why Petrol Powered Cars Aren’t Going Anywhere

Why Petrol Powered Cars Aren’t Going Anywhere

Internal combustion engines are still…

Oil Tankers Sunk Along U.S. Coastline in WWII Pose Environmental Threat

Oil Tankers Sunk Along U.S. Coastline in WWII Pose Environmental Threat

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has analysed 20,000 shipwrecks in US waters to determine the potential oil spill threat that they pose, and then presented their report to the Coast Guard.

Lisa Symons, the resources protection coordinator for NOAA’S Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, said that the “report is the most comprehensive assessment to date of the potential oil pollution threats from shipwrecks in U.S. waters. Now that we have analysed this data, the Coast Guard will be able to evaluate NOAA's recommendations and determine the most appropriate response to potential threats.”

It turns out that most of the 20,000 ships were either too small to worry about, ran on coal, not oil, or merely all the oil leaked out of them long ago.

However the study did find that 87 of the ships, 52 of those sunk during World War II (mostly by German U-boats), have the potential to spill tens of millions of gallons of crude oil in US waters. Although the government scientists involved in the research state that only six of the wrecks pose any serious threat to the environment, or local economies.

Related article: Fish Embryos Reveal that Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Still Lingers

17 of the more dangerous wrecks
17 of the more dangerous wrecks that NOAA surveyed, and into which it would like further investigation.

One of the biggest dangers is the oil tanker W.D. Anderson, which was sunk by two torpedoes as it sailed along the Florida coastline in February 1942, as it is feared to contain as much as 5.6 million gallons of crude oil in its tanks.

Symons said that even if those six spill just ten percent of their oil, it could easily cause a local-scale disaster, which while not being the worst spill ever on a national level, would certainly devastate local communities.

Related article: Exxon Oil Spill in Arkansas, Keystone Spoiler?

The report tries to play down the threat posed by these sunken ships, claiming that even if all 87 voided their entire cargo of oil, the resulting spill would be less than half the size of the 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico disaster which saw 200 million gallons leak into the sea.

Mmmmmm … that isn’t really the most comforting of thoughts, as even something approaching half the size of that environmental catastrophe would still be a devastating blow to marine habitats, and coastal cities and economies.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • josh bennett on September 25 2014 said:
    #best name ever lol....
    thanks it really helped me.

    josh
  • lallen2064 on May 23 2013 said:
    It makes me wonder, if there is there a way to extract the oil from these wrecks without triggering the environmental contamination that they fear?

    I would think that the amount of oil involved is so little (i.e. 5.6 million gallons) and the potential liability so high that no oil/salvage company would take on the challenge. Considering a liability point of view (EPA and private lawsuits), there is utterly no reason to get near those wrecks for any reason.

    Any company involved would definitely need government assurances to mitigate the liability and funding to offset the costs involved.
  • Billy on May 23 2013 said:
    How about harvesting the oil, solves the problem!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News