• 2 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 11 minutes China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 16 minutes When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 6 hours Oil prices going down
  • 12 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 12 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 3 days Bullish and bearish outlook for oil
  • 3 days Rolls Royce shedding 4,600 jobs
  • 1 day Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 3 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 2 days When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 11 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 2 days Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
  • 4 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 10 hours The Permian Mystery
  • 5 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 3 days U.S. Cars Will No Longer Need 55mpg Fuel Efficiency By 2025.
  • 3 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
  • 1 day Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
India, China Look To Form ‘Oil Buyers Club’

India, China Look To Form ‘Oil Buyers Club’

Amid rising oil prices, India…

240,000 Bpd Offline Following Clashes In Libya

240,000 Bpd Offline Following Clashes In Libya

Continuing clashes between the Libyan…

Oil Companies Win Case to Overturn Regulation Protecting Polar Bear Habita

Back in 2008 the polar bear was listed as a threatened species and given legal protection under the Endangered Species Act due to the loss of its sea-ice habitat.

To try and help the survival of the polar bear the US Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 187,000 square miles of the Arctic coastline for protection as critical habitat for the polar bear.

Outraged that such a large area of resource-rich land be put off limits from development, the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, and the state of Alaska, filed legal cases against the US government in 2011, claiming the area was excessive and unnecessary.

Related Article: Refiners Pursue More Pipelines amid Big Gains

At the end of last week a US court in Alaska overturned the federal decision that was meant to protect the polar bear and its habitat, ruling that whilst the protection rule was “valid in many respects,” not all the official steps were followed before adopting the regulation. The judge stated that the US Fish and Wildlife Service may return and file the rule again, once they had dealt with the “procedural deficiencies.”

U.S. District Judge Ralph Beistline commented that, “there is no question that the purpose behind the service's designation is admirable, for it is important to protect the polar bear, but such protection must be done correctly.”

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News