• 5 minutes Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 51 mins WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 6 mins Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 2 hours Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 5 hours Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 10 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 27 mins Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 12 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 5 hours Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 11 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 23 mins Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 1 day Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 1 day California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 16 hours Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
The Real Leader In Global Energy Production

The Real Leader In Global Energy Production

Last week President Trump was…

Global Energy Advisory – 10th August 2018

Global Energy Advisory – 10th August 2018

U.S. shale producers have been…

Oil Companies Win Case to Overturn Regulation Protecting Polar Bear Habita

Back in 2008 the polar bear was listed as a threatened species and given legal protection under the Endangered Species Act due to the loss of its sea-ice habitat.

To try and help the survival of the polar bear the US Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 187,000 square miles of the Arctic coastline for protection as critical habitat for the polar bear.

Outraged that such a large area of resource-rich land be put off limits from development, the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, and the state of Alaska, filed legal cases against the US government in 2011, claiming the area was excessive and unnecessary.

Related Article: Refiners Pursue More Pipelines amid Big Gains

At the end of last week a US court in Alaska overturned the federal decision that was meant to protect the polar bear and its habitat, ruling that whilst the protection rule was “valid in many respects,” not all the official steps were followed before adopting the regulation. The judge stated that the US Fish and Wildlife Service may return and file the rule again, once they had dealt with the “procedural deficiencies.”

U.S. District Judge Ralph Beistline commented that, “there is no question that the purpose behind the service's designation is admirable, for it is important to protect the polar bear, but such protection must be done correctly.”

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News