• 4 minutes Get First Access To The Oilprice App!
  • 7 minutes Blame Oil Price or EVs for Car Market Crash? Auto Recession Has Started
  • 11 minutes Japanese Refiners Load First Iran Oil Cargo Since U.S. Sanctions
  • 13 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 2 hours *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 52 mins Is Natural Gas Renewable? I say yes it is.
  • 9 hours Oceans "Under Fire" Of Plastic Trash
  • 3 hours Making Fun of EV Owners: ICE-ing Trend?
  • 1 hour Emissions from wear of brakes and tyres likely to be higher in supposedly clean vehicles, experts warn
  • 34 mins Renewables in US Set for Fast Growth
  • 12 hours Algorithms Taking Over Oil Fields
  • 14 hours Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 55 mins Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 27 mins Chinese FDI in U.S. Drops 90%: America's Clueless Tech Entrepreneurs
  • 19 hours Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 8 hours Orphan Wells
  • 16 hours UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
Oil Rises After Choppy Start To The Week

Oil Rises After Choppy Start To The Week

Oil prices rose by roughly…

Energy Transition Will Upend Geopolitics

Energy Transition Will Upend Geopolitics

A new report that surveys…

Oil Companies Win Case to Overturn Regulation Protecting Polar Bear Habita

Back in 2008 the polar bear was listed as a threatened species and given legal protection under the Endangered Species Act due to the loss of its sea-ice habitat.

To try and help the survival of the polar bear the US Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 187,000 square miles of the Arctic coastline for protection as critical habitat for the polar bear.

Outraged that such a large area of resource-rich land be put off limits from development, the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, and the state of Alaska, filed legal cases against the US government in 2011, claiming the area was excessive and unnecessary.

Related Article: Refiners Pursue More Pipelines amid Big Gains

At the end of last week a US court in Alaska overturned the federal decision that was meant to protect the polar bear and its habitat, ruling that whilst the protection rule was “valid in many respects,” not all the official steps were followed before adopting the regulation. The judge stated that the US Fish and Wildlife Service may return and file the rule again, once they had dealt with the “procedural deficiencies.”

U.S. District Judge Ralph Beistline commented that, “there is no question that the purpose behind the service's designation is admirable, for it is important to protect the polar bear, but such protection must be done correctly.”

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News