• 3 minutes THE GREAT OIL PRICE PREDICTION CHALLENGE OF 2018
  • 7 minutes Big Oil Costs Can't Go Much Lower
  • 12 minutes China’s Oil Futures Contract Is Beginning to Show Its Teeth
  • 5 hours China Tariff Threatens U.S. LNG Boom
  • 22 mins Blackouts in Australia
  • 2 mins So oil touched $80! (WTI break $71 twice). What does the future hold?
  • 5 hours Regime For Regime: China Says Willing To Provide Venezuela With What Help It Can
  • 11 hours Famous Musk's Tweet Puts Tesla Under Criminal Investigation
  • 5 mins Global Hunger Continues to Grow Driven By Climate Change
  • 18 hours Is your name Philip? No? Too bad!
  • 1 day The moves toward 'zero-manning' in oil & gas
  • 1 day Jan's Electric bike replaces electric cars
  • 1 day Funding Secured: Saudi Wealth Fund to Invest $1 Billion in Tesla's RIval Lucid to build its EV factory
  • 1 day Making Safe Nuclear Power from Thorium
  • 1 day Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 15 hours WTI now at $70+ headed for $50s
Why Oil Markets Can’t Escape OPEC, Russian Influence

Why Oil Markets Can’t Escape OPEC, Russian Influence

OPEC and their Russia-led non-OPEC…

Can Millennials Save Tesla?

Can Millennials Save Tesla?

Fee-free trading app Robinhood has…

Oil Companies Win Case to Overturn Regulation Protecting Polar Bear Habita

Back in 2008 the polar bear was listed as a threatened species and given legal protection under the Endangered Species Act due to the loss of its sea-ice habitat.

To try and help the survival of the polar bear the US Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 187,000 square miles of the Arctic coastline for protection as critical habitat for the polar bear.

Outraged that such a large area of resource-rich land be put off limits from development, the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, and the state of Alaska, filed legal cases against the US government in 2011, claiming the area was excessive and unnecessary.

Related Article: Refiners Pursue More Pipelines amid Big Gains

At the end of last week a US court in Alaska overturned the federal decision that was meant to protect the polar bear and its habitat, ruling that whilst the protection rule was “valid in many respects,” not all the official steps were followed before adopting the regulation. The judge stated that the US Fish and Wildlife Service may return and file the rule again, once they had dealt with the “procedural deficiencies.”

U.S. District Judge Ralph Beistline commented that, “there is no question that the purpose behind the service's designation is admirable, for it is important to protect the polar bear, but such protection must be done correctly.”

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News